‘I’m being heard right now’: amplifying individual voice through scaffolded focus groups

References

• Agar, M., & MacDonald, J. (1995). Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organization, 54(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. (2005). Making sense of focus groups. Medical Education, 39(7), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02200.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
   Google Scholar
• Broward County Public Schools. (2020). Historical enrollment counts. https://www.browardschools.com/Page/36825
   Google Scholar
• Broward County Public Schools Demographics and Enrollment Planning Department. (2019). Benchmark day enrollment report – September 9, 2019. https://www.browardschools.com/cms/lib/FL01803656/Centricity/domain/13425/data/enrollment%20projections/counts/2019-20/benchmark/Appendix%20CPart2_Ethnicity%201920.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cook, C. R., Coco, S., Zhang, Y., Fiat, A. E., Duong, M. T., Renshaw, T. L., & Frank, S. (2018). Cultivating positive teacher-student relationships: Preliminary evaluation of the establish – Maintain – Restore (EMR) method. Educational Psychology, 47(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0025.V47-3
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, S., & Smith, I. (2003). The Hawthorne Effect: Is it a help or a hindrance in social science research? Change: Transformations in Education, 4(1), 97–111. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.200307649
   Google Scholar
• Daley, A. M. (2013). Adolescent-friendly remedies for the challenges of focus group research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35(8), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945913483881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P., & Rutledge, S. A. (2018). The embedded lesson approach to social media research: Researching online phenomena in an authentic offline setting. TechTrends, 62(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaper, G. (1990). The Hawthorne Effect: A fresh examination. Educational Studies, 16(3), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569900160305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, A., Veloso, L., Marques, J., & Sebastião, J. (2015). Site-specific focus groups: Analysing learning spaces in situ. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.910743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggleberger, L., Adamowitsch, M., Teutsch, F., Felder-Puig, R., & Dür, W. (2015). The use of group discussions: A case study of learning about organisational characteristics of schools. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.860746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, A. J., Kern, M. L., Garrett, D. K., & Turnbull, D. A. (2019). The student voice in well- being: A case study of participatory action research in positive education. Educational Action Research, 27(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1436079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. M., Pritchard, R. E., Welsh, C. N., Potter, G. C., & Saccucci, M. S. (2002). The effects of using in-class focus groups on student course evaluations. Journal of Education for Business, 77(6), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599684
   Google Scholar
• Harden, J., Scott, S., Backett-Milburn, K., & Jackson, S. (2000). Can’t talk, won’t talk? Methodological issues in researching children. Sociological Research Online, 5(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.486
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C., Jackson, L., Mayblin, L., Piekut, A., & Valentine, G. (2015). ‘Big Brother welcomes you’: Exploring innovative methods for research with children and young people outside of the home and school environments. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114548947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students’ critical thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4), 3–24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1061947
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ Clinical Research, 311(7000), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman-Boyden, P., & Richardson, M. (2013). An evaluation of mixed methods (diaries and focus groups) when working with older people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(5), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.716971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, R., Gardner, J., Mitchell, S., Lundy, L., Odena, O., Galanouli, D., & Clough, P. (2007). Consulting pupils in Assessment for Learning classrooms: The twists and turns of working with students as co-researchers. Educational Action Research, 15(3), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790701514887
   Google Scholar
• LeMahieu, P. (2011, October). What we need in education is more integrity (and less fidelity) of implementation. Carnegie Commons Blog. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/what-we-need-in-education-is-more-integrity-and-less-fidelity-of-implementation/
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague, J., Phillips, E., Holland, F., & Archer, S. (2020). Expanding hermeneutic horizons: Working as multiple researchers and with multiple participants. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2632084320947571
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., Gibbs, S., Maxwell, K., & Britten, N. (2002). Hearing children's voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7-11 years. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 5–20. We were unable to add it manually.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, V. (1998). If you were a teacher, it would be harder to talk to you: Reflections on qualitative research with children in school. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(4), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846882
   Google Scholar
• Överlien, C., Aronsson, K., & Hydén, M. (2005). The focus group interview as an in-depth method? Young women talking about sexuality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557042000119607
   Google Scholar
• Pinter, A., & Zandian, S. (2015). ‘I thought it would be tiny little one phrase that we said in a huge big pile of papers’: Children’s reflections on their involvement in participatory research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112465637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaglia, R., & Corso, M. (2014). Student voice: The instrument of change. SAGE Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Quayyum, A. (2018). Student attitudes and help-seeking behaviors in a digital era. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(17), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0100-7
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge, S. A., Brown, S., & Petrova, K. (2017). Scaling personalization: Exploring the implementation of an academic and social-emotional innovation in high schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368650
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge, S. A., Cannata, M., Brown, S., & Traeger, D. (2020). Steps to schoolwide success: Systemic practices for connecting social-emotional and academic learning. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge, S. A., Cohen-Vogel, L., Osborne-Lampkin, L., & Roberts, R. (2015). Understanding effective high schools: Evidence for personalization for academic and social emotional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1060–1092. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215602328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172
   Google Scholar
• Walters, R. (2020). Relinquishing control in focus groups: The use of activities in feminist research with young people to improve moderator performance. Qualitative Research, 20(4), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119847633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(3), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., & Katz, L. (2001). The use of focus group methodology in education: Some theoretical and practical considerations. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 5(3),1-10.  https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/iejll/index.php/iejll/article/view/496/158
   Google Scholar