Safe and enabling: composing ethically sustainable crafty-activist research on gender and power in young peer cultures

References

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodén, L. (2021). On, to, with, for, by: Ethics and children in research. Children’s Geographies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1891405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozalek, V. (2020). Rendering each other capable: Doing response-able research responsibly. In K. Murris (Ed.), Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines (pp. 135–147). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2018). Ethics and the new materialism: A brief genealogy of the “post” philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse, 39(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1234682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.921458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, A., Powell, M. A., & Taylor, N. (2015). Ethical research involving children: Encouraging reflexive engagement in research with children and young people. Children & Society, 29(5), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthlucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Piatelli, D. (2012). The feminist practice of holistic reflexivity. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (2nd ed., pp. 557–582). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., Horn, C., Willcox, M., & Florence, E. (2021). Arts-based methods for research with children. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2020). New materialism, ethnography, and socially engaged practice: Space-time folds and the agency of matter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuki, T., Hänninen, S., Koivukangas, A., & Tumanyan, M. (2017a, December 16). On the surface – under the surface. Arts-based methods in addressing sensitive matters in children’s gendered power relations [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6cTQzd6BUY
   Google Scholar
• Huuki, T., Hänninen, S., Koivukangas, A., & Tumanyan, M. (2017b, December 11). Totuuden hetket/moments of truth [video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esaiaSCq2EQ
   Google Scholar
• Huuki, T., Kyrölä, K., & Pihkala, S. (2021). What else can a crush become: Working with arts-methods to address experiences of sexual harassment in pre-teen relationship cultures. Gender and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2021.1989384
   Google Scholar
• Huuki, T., & Pihkala, S. (2018). #metoo postscriptum. University of Oulu, Finland. https://metoopostscript.wordpress.com/
   Google Scholar
• Huuki, T. (2019). Collaging the virtual: Exploring gender materialisations in the artwork of pre-teen children. Childhood, 26(4), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219862321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallon, S., & Elliott, I. (2021). What is ‘sensitive’ about sensitive research? The sensitive researchers’ perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(5), 523–535 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1857966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N. S. (2018). A Posthumanist ethics of mattering: New materialisms and the ethical practice of inquiry. In R. Iphofen & M. Tolich (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics (pp. 51–72). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435446.n4
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2019). The mis/uses of “voice” in (post)qualitative research with children and young people: Histories, politics and ethics. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(10), 1191–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1659438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, J., & Robinson, K. H. (Eds.). (2019). Feminists researching gendered childhoods: Generative entanglements. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, L., & Kara, H. (2017). Presenting and representing others: Towards an ethics of engagement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1287875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihkala, S., Huuki, T., Heikkinen, M., & Sunnari, V. (2018). Reconfigurings of non-violence as a matter of sustainability and response-ability. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2018.1461130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihkala, S., Huuki, T., & Sunnari, V. (2019). Moving with touch: Entanglements of a child, Valentine’s Day cards, and research–activism against sexual harassment in pre-teen peer cultures. Social Sciences, 8(8), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8080226
   Google Scholar
• Pihkala, S., & Huuki, T. (2019). How a hashtag matters – Crafting response(-abilities) through research-activism on sexual harassment in pre-teen peer cultures. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 10(2–3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.3678
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. A., Graham, A., & Truscott, J. (2016). Ethical research involving children: Facilitating reflexive engagement. Qualitative Research Journal, 16(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-07-2015-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. A., McArthur, M., Chalmers, J., Graham, A., Moore, T., Spriggs, M., & Taplin, S. (2018). Sensitive topics in social research involving children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1462882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E., Edwards, V., & Huuki, T. (2020). Becoming eventful: Making the “more-than” of a youth activist conference matter. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 25(3), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2020.1767562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Pin-balling and boners: The posthuman phallus and intra-activist sexuality assemblages in secondary school. In L. Allen & M. Rasmussen (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sexuality education (pp. 631–653). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2019). JARring: Making phematerialist research practices matter. MAI: Feminism and Visual Culture, 4(Summer 2019). https://maifeminism.com/introducing-phematerialism-feminist-posthuman-and-new-materialist-research-methodologies-in-education/.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E. (2018). “Feel what I feel”: Making da(r)ta with teen girls for creative activisms on how sexual violence matters. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1296352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., Warfield, K., & Zarabadi, S. (Eds.). (2019). Feminist posthumanisms, new materialisms and education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romm, N. R. A. (2020). Reflections on a post-qualitative inquiry with children/young people: Exploring and furthering a performative research ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 21(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.1.3360
   Google Scholar
• Rutanen, N., & Vehkalahti, K. (Eds.). (2019). Tutkimuseettisestä sääntelystä elettyyn kohtaamiseen. Lasten ja nuorten tutkimuksen etiikka II (From research ethical control to living encounter. Ethics in researching children and young people II). Nuorisotutkimusseura.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, C. M. (Ed.). (2019). Ethics and research with young children: New perspectives. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K., Ringrose, J., Osgood, J., & Renold, E. (2019). Editorial. Phematerialism: Response-able research & pedagogy. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 3(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.3649
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (2013). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. Gender and Education, 25(6), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tumanyan, M., & Huuki, T. (2020). Arts in working with youth on sensitive topics: A qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Arts through Education, 16(3), 381–397 doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00040_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. (2010). Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body & Society, 16(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar