The ResQ approach: theory building across disciplines using realist evaluation science and QCA

References

• Abner, G. B., Kim, S. Y., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Building evidence for public human resource management: Using middle range theory to link theory and data. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x17697248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astbury, B., & Leeuw, F. L. (2010). Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010371972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Befani, B., Ledermann, S., & Sager, F. (2007). Realistic evaluation and QCA: Conceptual parallels and an empirical application. Evaluation, 13(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007075222
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008 [1975]). A realist theory of science. London: Verso books.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Briscoe, S., & Wright, J. M. (2020). The “realist search”: A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Harris, J., Croot, E., Springett, J., Campbell, F., & Wilkins, E. (2013). Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: Case study (CLUSTER). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2018). Researching complex large-scale nested interventions. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 91–106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cronqvist, L. (2019). QCA Add-In [Version 1.1] University of Trier . https://www.qca-addin.net
   Google Scholar
• Crossref. (2019 ()). Cross ref annual report & Fact File 2018-19. https://doi.org/10.13003/y8ygwm5
   Google Scholar
• Dalkin, S. M., Greenhalgh, J., Jones, D., Cunningham, B., & Lhussier, M. (2015). What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation Science: IS, 10(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2021). Post-disciplinary realism. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1803526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., & Verweij, S. (2013). Critical realism as a meta-framework for understanding the relationships between complexity and qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Critical Realism, 12(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1179/rea.12.2.p663527490513071
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2006). Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2017). Multimethod research, causal mechanisms, and case studies: An integrated approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. & Starr, H. , Eds. (2002). Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
   Google Scholar
• Goicolea, I., Vives-Cases, C., Hurtig, A.-K., Marchal, B., Briones-Vozmediano, E., Otero-García, L., & San Sebastian, M. (2015). Mechanisms that trigger a good health-care response to intimate partner violence in spain. combining realist evaluation and qualitative comparative analysis approaches. PLoS One, 10(8), e0135167. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. (2020). Retroductive theorizing in pawson and Tilley’s applied scientific realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1723301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmar, D. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Theory knitting: An integrative approach to theory development. Philosophical Psychology, 1(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515088808572934
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, F. L., & Donaldson, S. I. (2015). Theory in evaluation: Reducing confusion and encouraging debate. Evaluation, 21(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015607712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchal, B., Kegels, G., & Van Belle, S. (2018). Theory and realist methods. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 79–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006a). Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595314
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006b). Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: An introduction. ESRC Research Methods Programme Working Paper (2), 1–46 .
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. (2010). A strategic Agenda for public human resource management research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x09351821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2014 [1987]). The Comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, R. (2021). Uncertainty, possibility and causal power in QCA. Sociological Methods & Research, 1–30. . https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211031268
   Google Scholar
• Sager, F., & Andereggen, C. (2012). Dealing with complex causality in realist synthesis:The promise of qualitative comparative analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011411574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomoaia-Cotisel, A., Kim, H., Allen, S. D., & Blanchet, K. (2017). Causal loop diagrams: A tool for visualizing emergent system behaviour. In D. de Savigny, K. Blanchet, & T. Adam (Eds.), Applied systems thinking for health systems research: A methodological handbook (pp. 97–114). London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G. (2018). Understanding mechanisms in realist evaluation and research. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 41–57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2018). Making up mechanisms in realist research. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 25–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G. (2018). Data gathering in realist reviews: Looking for needles in haystacks. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 131–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar