Stepping Beyond Transcripts: A Framework for Analyzing Interaction in Focus Groups

References

• Albergaria-Almeida, P. (2010). Classroom questioning: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.015
   Google Scholar
• Asbury, J. (1995). Overview of focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 5(4), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239500500402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. H. (1995). Asking why about social problems: Ideology and causal models in the public mind. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7(4), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/7.4.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. H., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1961). Some functions of qualitative analysis in social research. In S. M. Lipset & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), Sociology, the progress of a decade: A collection of articles (pp. 95–122). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interview: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education & Behavior, 14(4), 411–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818701400404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1970). Field work evidence. In H. Becker (Ed.), Sociological work: Method and substance (pp. 39–62). Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). The 1955 normative study of the tests of general educational development. School Review, 64(3), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1086/442296
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, M., & Liatto-Katundu, B. (1994). A focus group assessment of political attitudes in Zambia. African Affairs, 93(373), 535–563. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a098758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristol, T., & Fern, E. F. (1996). Exploring the atmosphere created by focus group interviews: Comparing consumers’ feelings across qualitative techniques. Journal of the Market Research Society, 38(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539603800208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom, A. (2005). Using qualitative interviews in CAM research: A guide to study design, data collection and data analysis. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 13(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2005.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, J. (2016). The pitfalls and promise of focus groups as a data collection method. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(2), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115570065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggleby, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304273916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern, E. F. (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: The effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., Weatherall, A., & Watson, B. (2021). Interactional adjustment: Three approaches in language and social psychology. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 40(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20965652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social Research Update, 19(8), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grønkjær, M., Curtis, T., de Crespigny, C., & Delmar, C. (2011). Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator. Qualitative Studies, 2(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v2i1.4273
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. (2010). Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Lewis Partnership, J. (2022). https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1981). What are scientific revolutions? MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1935). The art of asking WHY in marketing research: Three principles underlying the formulation of questionnaires. National Marketing Review, 1(1), 26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1975). Working with Merton. In L. A. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 35–66). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 25(2), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276428102500205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1967). On theoretical sociology: Five essays old and new. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1987). The focussed interview and focus group: Continuities and discontinuities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 550–566. https://doi.org/10.1086/269057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2010). Reconsidering the role of interaction in analyzing and reporting focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 20(5), 718–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310364627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Spanish, M. T. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 7(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987314
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 189–208). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, (pp. 397–430). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. L., & Tan, B. (2011). Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Information and Organization, 21(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, J. (1992). “Case study” in American methodological thought. Current Sociology, 40(1), 17–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139292040001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. (2009). For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 85. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44632557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinkus, M. A., Donovan, S. M., Hall, T. E., & O’Rourke, M. (2021). Using a survey to initiate and sustain productive group dialogue in focus groups. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1786240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, E., Anderson, R., & Botkin, J. R. (2016). Deliberative discussion focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315591150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tarman, B., & Kuran, B. (2015). Examination of the cognitive level of questions in social studies textbooks and the views of teachers based on Bloom taxonomy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2625
   Google Scholar
• Warr, D. J. (2005). “It was fun … but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V., Dahlgren, M. A., & Öberg, G. (2007). Learning in focus groups: An analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107076023
   Google Scholar
• Wilen, W. W., & Clegg, A. A., Jr. (1986). Effective questions and questioning: A research review. Theory & Research in Social Education, 14(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1986.10505518
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in health research: Exploring the meanings of health and illness. Journal of Health Psychology, 3(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539800300304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar