‘For Want of a Nail’: developing a transparent approach to retroduction and early initial programme theory development in a realist evaluation of community end of life care services

References

• Anderson, R., & Hardwick, R. (2016). Realism and resources: Towards more explanatory economic evaluation. Evaluation, 22(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016652742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M., Sharp, R., Stones, R., & Woodiwiss, T. (1999). Critical realism and research methodology. Alethia, 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1558/aleth.v2i1.12
   Google Scholar
• Astbury, B. (2018). Making claims using realist methods. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 81–89). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129121677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Bone, A. E., Morgan, M., Maddocks, M., Sleeman, K. E., Wright, J., Taherzadeh, S., & Evans, C. J. (2016). Developing a model of short-term integrated palliative and supportive care for frail older people in community settings: Perspectives of older people, carers and other key stakeholders. Age and Ageing, 45(6), 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, C., Brigden, C., Gage, H., Williams, P., Holdsworth, L., Greene, K., Wee, B., Barclay, S., & Wilson, P. (2018). Optimum hospice at home services for end-of life care: Protocol of a mixed-methods study employing realist evaluation. BMJ Open, 8(5), e021192. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory driven evaluations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D., Armstrong, M., & Allan, A. (2014). Imminence of death among hospital inpatients: Prevalent cohort study. Palliative Medicine, 28(6), 474–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314526443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkin, S. M., Greenhalgh, J., Jones, D., Cunningham, B., & Lhussier, M. (2015). What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation Science, 10(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., Ekströ, M. M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (1997). Generalization, scientific inference and models for an explanatory social science. In D. Berth (Ed.), Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences (pp. 73–114). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, F., Dixon-Woods, M., Leviton, L., & Michie, S. (2015). Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2017). Doing reflexivity: An introduction. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Weger, E., Van Vooren, N. J. E., Wong, G., Dalkin, S., Marchal, B., Drewes, H. W., & Baan, C. A. (2020). What’s in a realist configuration? Deciding which causal configurations to use, how, and why. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920938577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fick, F., & Muhajarine, N. (2019). First steps: Creating an initial program theory for a realist evaluation of healthy start-Départ Santé intervention in childcare centres. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1595375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis-Auton, E., Sarkies, M. N., Pomare, C., Long, J. C., Hardwick, R., Nguyen, H. M., & Braithwaite, J. (2022). Real talk: A realist dialogic approach in a realist evaluation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221120748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frogatt, K. (2001). Life and death in English nursing homes: Sequestration or transition? Ageing and Society, 21(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686100100825x
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Jagosh, J., Greenhalgh, J., Manzano, A., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2015). Protocol—the RAMESES II study: Developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation: Figure 1. BMJ Open, 5(8), e008567. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S., Weston, L., Morgan-Trimmer, S., Wheat, H., Gude, A., Manger, L., Oh, T. M., Clarkson, P., Quinn, C., Sheaff, R., Clark, M., Sherriff, I., & Byng, R. (2022). Engaging stakeholders in realist programme theory building: Insights from the prospective phase of a primary care dementia support study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221077521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, L. A., Higginson, I. J., & Daveson, B. A., (2016). ‘I'll be in a safe place’: A qualitative study of the decisions taken by people with advanced cancer to seek emergency department care. BMJ Open, 6, e012134. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. (2020). Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley’s applied scientific realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1723301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannix, K. (2021). Listen: A powerful new book about life, death, relationships, mental health and how to talk about what matters. William Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Manzano, A. (2016). The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation, 22(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016638615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchal, B., Kegels, G., & Van Belle, S. (2018). Theory and realist methods. In N. Emmel, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, M. Monaghan, & S. Dalkin (Eds.), Doing realist research (pp. 79–90). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, B., van Belle, S., van Olmen, J., Hoerée, T., & Kegels, G. (2012). Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation, 18(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012442444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C., Finch, T., Mair, F., Ballini, L., Dowrick, C., Eccles, M., Gask, L., MacFarlane, A., Murray, E., Rapley, T., Rogers, A., Treweek, S., Wallace, P., Anderson, G., Burns, J., & Heaven, B. (2007). Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: The normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research, 7(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mears, A. (2017). Puzzling in sociology: On doing and undoing theoretical puzzles. Sociological Theory, 35(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117709775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meleis, A. I. (2015). Transitions Theory. In M. C. Smith, Parker, M. E. (Eds.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (4th ed.). (pp. 361–380). F A Davies.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. B., & Lunnay, B. (2013). The application of abductive and retroductive inference for the design and analysis of theory-driven sociological research. Sociological Research Online, 18(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoev, T., Etiaba, E., Ebenso, B., Uzochukwu, B., Ensor, T., Onwujekwe, O., Huss, R., Ezumah, N., & Manzano, A. (2020). Tracing theories in realist evaluations of large-scale health programmes in low- and middle-income countries: Experience from Nigeria. Health Policy and Planning, 35(9), 1244–1253. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C. (2021). Retroductive theorizing: A contribution of critical realism to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211049847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., Kabongo, E. M., & Eastwood, J. G. (2021). Examining the application of retroductive theorizing in realist-informed studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211053516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., Marchal, B., Van Belle, S., & van Wyk, B. (2018). Unearthing how, why, for whom and under what health system conditions the antiretroviral treatment adherence club intervention in South Africa works: A realist theory refining approach. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3150-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., Van Belle, S., Marchal, B., & Van Wyk, B. (2016). Realist evaluation of the antiretroviral treatment adherence club programme in selected primary healthcare facilities in the metropolitan area of Western Cape Province, South Africa: A study protocol. BMJ Open, 6(4), e009977. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIHR. (2019). UK standards for public involvement. Retrieved May 21, 2021, from https://sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/pi-standards/standards
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2008) Causality for beginners. NCRM Research Methods Festival 2008 [ Unpublished]. Retrieved December 13, 2022, Unpublished https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/245/
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2021). ‘Reply-To: Realist and Meta-narrative Synthesis: Evolving Standards’ [email protected]>UK. Mon 6 Dec 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01379-7
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Manzano-Santaella, A. (2012). A realist diagnostic workshop. Evaluation, 18(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012440912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realistic evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Punton, M., Vogel, I., & Lloyd, R. (2016). Reflections from a realist evaluation in progress: Scaling ladders and stitching theory. Centre for Development Impact.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., Gott, M., & Ingleton, C. (2014). Patient and family experiences of palliative care in hospital: What do we know? An integrative review. Palliative Medicine, 28(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313487568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., Schultz, A., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Stetler, C. B., Titler, M., Wallin, L., & Wilson, V. (2012). Realist synthesis: Illustrating the method for implementation research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand, L., Olsson, M., & Strang, P. (2009). Coping strategies in the presence of one’s own impending death from cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearn, K., Allmark, P., Piercy, H., & Hirst, J. (2017). Building realist program theory for large complex and messy interventions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691774179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917741796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, P., & Myles, P. (2019). Eliciting and reconstructing programme theory: An exercise in translating theory into practice. Evaluation, 25(4), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019870211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, F., Glascott, M., Eke, A., Hedgecock, K., Kelly, M., Saint, P., Singh, J., Small, V., Tasker, F., & Walker, G. (2022). Key stakeholder perspectives on expert-by-experience involvement in the values-based recruitment of student mental health nurses: A co-produced qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 118, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G. (2012). Using complexity-consistent theory for evaluating complex systems. Evaluation, 18(4), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012460963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Westhorp, G., Greenhalgh, J., Manzano, A., Jagosh, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2017). Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: The RAMESES II project. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(28), 28. Available at. https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/hsdr05280/#/abstract
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Westhorp, G., Manzano, A., Greenhalgh, J., Jagosh, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2016). RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. BMC Medicine, 14(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar