References
- Ahler, D. J., Roush, C. E., & Sood, G. (2019). The micro-task market for lemons: Data quality on amazon’s mechanical turk. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.57
- Ballard, A. M., Cardwell, T., & Young, A. M. (2019). Fraud detection protocol for web-based research among men who have sex with men: Development and descriptive evaluation. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 5(1), e12344. https://doi.org/10.2196/12344
- Bauermeister, J., Pingel, E., Zimmerman, M., Couper, M., Carballo-Diéguez, A., & Strecher, V. J. (2012). Data quality in web-based HIV/AIDS research: Handling invalid and suspicious data. field methods, 24(3), 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12443097
- Bosnjak, M., & Tuten, T. L. (2003). Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys: An experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303021002006
- Bowen, A. M., Daniel, C. M., Williams, M. L., & Baird, G. L. (2008). Identifying multiple submissions in internet research: Preserving data integrity. AIDS and Behavior, 12(6), 964–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9352-2
- Buchanan, E. M., & Scofield, J. E. (2018). Methods to detect low quality data and its implication for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2586–2596. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1035-6
- Dewitt, J., Capistrant, B., Kohli, N., Rosser, B. S., Mitteldorf, D., Merengwa, E., & West, W. (2018). Addressing participant validity in a small internet health survey (The restore study): Protocol and recommendations for survey response validation. JMIR Research Protocols, 7(4), e7655. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.7655
- Howell, B. (n.d.). Dealing with Bots, Randoms and Satisficing in Online Research. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://www.psychstudio.com/articles/bots-randoms-satisficing/
- Perkel, J. M., & Simone, M. (2020). Melissa Simone Survey Sleuth. Nature, 579(7799), 461–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00768-0
- Pozzar, R., Hammer, M. J., Underhill-Blazey, M., Wright, A. A., Tulsky, J. A., Hong, F., Gundersen, D. A., & Berry, D. L. (2020). Threats of bots and other bad actors to data quality following research participant recruitment through social media: Cross-sectional questionnaire. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e23021. https://doi.org/10.2196/23021
- Shanahan, T. (2018). Are you paying bots to take your online survey? Fors Marsh Group. https://www.forsmarshgroup.com/knowledge/news-blog/posts/2018/march/are-you-paying-bots-to-take-your-online-survey/
- Simone, M. (2019). Bots started sabotaging my online research. In Ifought back. Statnews. https://www.StatnewsCom/2019/11/21/Bots-Started-Sabotaging-My-Online-Research-i-Fought-Back
- Storozuk, A., Ashley, M., Delage, V., & Maloney, E. (2020). Got bots? Practical recommendations to protect online survey data from bot attacks. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(5), 472–481. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.5.p472
- Teitcher, J. E. F., Bockting, W. O., Bauermeister, J. A., Hoefer, C. J., Miner, M. H., & Klitzman, R. L. (2015). Detecting, preventing, and responding to “fraudsters” in internet research: Ethics and tradeoffs. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12200