Speculative methodological subjects

References

• Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkin, J. M. (1996). Deconstruction. In D. Patterson (Ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (pp. 361–368). Blackwell publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C., & Gleyzon, F. X. (2016). Deleuze and the event (s). Journal for Cultural Research, 20(4), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2016.1264770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett. (2010). Vibrant matter a political ecology of things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822391623
   Google Scholar
• Bright, D. (2018). Writing posthumanist subjects. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(10), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418785197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler. (2005). Giving an account of oneself (1st ed.). Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchetto, D. (2009). Sounding the Hyperlink: Skewed remote Musical Performance and the virtual subject. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 42(1), 1–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44030648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debaise, D., Stengers, I., Stengers, I. (2017). Speculative empiricism. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474423045.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. Original work published1980.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. N. (2010). On elephants and gold standards. Qualitative Research, 10(2), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109357367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diprose, R. (2017). Speculative research, temporality and politics. In A. Wilkie, M. Savransky, & M. Rosengarten (Eds.), Speculative research: The lure of possible futures (pp. 39–51). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Diprose, R., & Reynolds, J. (2014). Merleau-Ponty: Key concepts. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. (2018). Art on the Internet and the digital public Sphere ( 1994-2003). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, J., Lindley, J., & McNicol, S. (2017). Near future school: World building beyond a neoliberal present with participatory design fictions. Futures, 99, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Durance, P., & Godet, M. (2010). Scenario building: Uses and abuses. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(9), 1488–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, M. E. (2011). Amnesia, nostalgia, and the politics of place memory. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910373553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, W. (2011). Embodied knowledge: Sounds as educational systems. Journal of Curriculum Theory, 27(2), 66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (2010). Prologue to art, social imagination, and action. Journal of Educational Controversy, 5(1). https://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol5/iss1/2.
   Google Scholar
• Haiven, M. and Khasnabish, A. (2014). The radical imagination. Fernwood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350223462
   Google Scholar
• Halewood, M. (2017). Situated speculation as a constraint on thought. In A. Wilkie, M. Savransky, & M. Rosengarten (Eds.), Speculative research: The lure of possible futures (pp. 52–63). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Hall, S. D. (2015). Learning to imagine the future: The value of affirmative speculation in climate change education. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5250/resilience.2.2.004
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2016). Immaterialism: Objects and social theory. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. (2000). Making sense: Embodiment and the Sensibilities of the everyday. Environment and Planning D, Society Space, 18(4), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1068/d195t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, A. F. (2015). The familiar observer: Seeing beyond the expected in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.920809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaljonen, M., Peltola, T., Salo, M., & Furman, E. (2019). Attentive, speculative experimental research for sustainability transitions: An exploration in sustainable eating. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802793
   Google Scholar
• Koro, M., Wolgemuth, J., & Trinh, E. (in press). Reducing methodological footprints in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz, A. M. (2019). Qualitative inquiry, cartography, and the promise of material change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173412
   Google Scholar
• Lather. (2007). Getting lost : feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2012). The ruins of neo-liberalism and the construction of a new (scientific) subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 1021–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9465-4
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense, movement, sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2020). For a pragmatics of the useless. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the Ecology of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masini, E. B., & Vasquez, J. M. (2000). Scenarios as seen from a human and social perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00127-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. (2021). Speculative inquiry: Thinking with Whitehead. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420934138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meillassoux, Q. (2011). Potentiality and virtuality. In R. Mackay, L. Bryant, N. Srnicek and G. Harman (Eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism (pp. 224–236). re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. (2016). Notes toward a speculative methodology of everyday life. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 646–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115626245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkaynak, B., & Rodríguez-Labajos, B. (2010). Multi-scale interaction in local scenario-building: A methodological framework. Futures, 42(9), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, K., & Lloyd, D. (2016). Use of future scenarios as a pedagogical approach for science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 46(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9505-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, J. (2022). LGBTQ Youth Citizenship and Subjectivities. [ Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations theses/lgbtq-youth-citizenship-subjectivities/docview/2756128748/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, M., Wilkie, A., & Rosengarten, M. Eds. (2017). Speculative research: The lure of possible futures. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315541860
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2014). The universe of things: On speculative realism. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2011). Thinking with Whitehead: A free and wild creation of concepts. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2008). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2008.1.3.319
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418772634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, M., & Arndt, S. (2017). Cross-cultural complexities of educational policies. Policy Futures in Education, 15(6), 665–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317736181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrence, H. (2017). Be careful what you wish for: Data entanglements in qualitative research, policy, and neoliberal governance. In D. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times (pp. 73–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Notten, P. (2006). Scenario development: A typology of approaches. In (Eds.), Think scenarios, rethink education (pp. 69–92). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264023642-6-en
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, A. M. (2023). Micromoments in neuroplexure: Creative (professional) learning for post-oppositional transformation in inclusive education [ Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest. https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.2.N.187595
   Google Scholar
• Vitrukh, M. (2023). Embodied educational experiences of students who were forced to move from Ukrainian war areas and study at Ukrainian Displaced Universities. [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Whitburn, B. (2016). Voice, post-structural representation and the subjectivity of ‘included’ students. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.946497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1959). The function of reason. SAGA Egmont.
   Google Scholar