Combining Q methodology and interviews using mixed methods integration: an exemplar study exploring over-the-counter codeine misuse in Australia

References

• Åkerblad, L., Seppänen-Järvelä, R., & Haapakoski, K. (2021). Integrative strategies in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820957125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, F. M. (2018). Self-guided change: The most common form of long-term, maintained health behavior change. Health Psychology Open, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102917751576
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. J. (2011). Respectable addiction: A qualitative study of over-the-counter medicine abuse in the UK. Pharmacy Practice Research Trust. https://pharmacyresearchuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/respectable_addiction_richard_cooper_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, A., Guerin, S., Delaney, S., & Dodd, P. (2020). Exposition and application of a framework for integration in a mixed methods study: A case study from complicated grief. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820979129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fàbregues, S., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2017). Addressing quality in mixed methods research: A review and recommendations for a future agenda. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2847–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, T., Robinson, K., Elliott, S. J., & Eyles, J. (2006). Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 16(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Part 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816682092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K., & Porock, D. (2010). The use of interviews in Q methodology: Card content analysis. Nursing Research, 59(4), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181e4ffff
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, M., Palmer, R., & Cooper, C. (2020). Factors associated with adherence to self-managed aphasia therapy practice on a computer—A mixed methods study alongside a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Neurology, 11(582328). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.582328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heslehurst, N., Dinsdale, S., Sedgewick, G., Simpson, H., Sen, S., Summerbell, C. D., Rankin, J., & Baradaran, H. R. (2015). An evaluation of the implementation of maternal obesity pathways of care: A mixed methods study with data integration. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0127122. Article e0127122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschbaum, M., Barnett, T., & Cross, M. (2019a). ‘For pain, no shame’ and ‘my secret solace’: Accounts of over-the-counter codeine dependence using Q methodology. International Journal of Drug Policy, 73, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschbaum, M., Barnett, T., & Cross, M. (2019b). Q sample construction: A novel approach incorporating a Delphi technique to explore opinions about codeine dependence. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), Article 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0741-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirschbaum, M., Barnett, T., & Cross, M. (2020). Experiences of over‐the‐counter codeine misusers and accounts of recovery: A qualitative study in Tasmania, Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review, 39(7), 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058870
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2019). Commentary—after triangulation, what next? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818780596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S., Cameron, J., Pahoki, S. (2010). Final report 2010. Over the counter codeine dependence. Australia: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.https://www.vgls.vic.gov.au/client/en_AU/search/asset/1268054/0
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. The British Medical Journal, 341(sep17 1), c4587–c4587. Article c4587. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Racine, E., Riordan, F., Phillip, E., Flynn, G., McHugh, S., & Kearney, P. M. (2020). ‘It just wasn’t going to be heard’: A mixed methods study to compare different ways of involving people with diabetes and health‐care professionals in health intervention research. Health Expectations, 23(4), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. (2015). Theoretical significance in Q methodology: A qualitative approach to a mixed method. Research in the Schools, 22(1), 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815610998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. (2021). Mixed methods research and quantum theory: Q methodology as an exemplar for complementarity. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211019497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmolck, P. (2014). PQMethod (Version 2.35) [Computer Software]. http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/
   Google Scholar
• Schröter, M., & Taylor, C. (2018). Introduction. In M. Schröter & C. Taylor (Eds.), Exploring silence and absence in discourse: Empirical approaches (pp. 1–21). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton Rogers, W. (1991). Explaining health and illness: An exploration of diversity. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, P., & Stainton Rogers, R. (2004). Q methodology and qualiquantology: The example of discriminating between emotions. In Z. Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Mixing methods in psychology: The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (pp. 101–120). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., Johnson, M. J., & Dowding, D. W. (2020). Clinical decision-making at the end of life: A mixed-methods study. British Medical Journal Supportive & Palliative Care, 10(3), e26–e26. Article e26. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkin-Crine, S., Anthierens, S., Hood, K., Yardley, L., Cals, J. W., Francis, N. A., Coenen, S., van der Velden, A. W., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Llor, C., Butler, C. C., Verheij, T. J. M., Goossens, H., & Little, P. (2015). Discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative evaluation of randomised controlled trial results: Achieving clarity through mixed methods triangulation. Implementation Science, 11(1), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0436-0
   Google Scholar
• Toomey, E., Matthews, J., & Hurley, D. A. (2017). Using mixed methods to assess fidelity of delivery and its influencing factors in a complex self-management intervention for people with osteoarthritis and low back pain. British Medical Journal Open, 7(8), e015452. Article e015452. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Exel, J., & de Graaf, G. (2005). Q Methodology: A Sneak Preview. https://qmethodblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/qmethodologyasneakpreviewreferenceupdate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Hout, M. C. (2013). A respectable addiction: Over the counter codeine use, misuse and dependence. In M. C. Van Hout (Ed.), Drug use and abuse: Signs/symptoms, physical and psychological effects and intervention approaches (pp. 107–118). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hout, M. C., Bergin, M., Foley, M., Rich, E., Rapca, A. I., Harris, R., Norman, I. (2014). A scoping review of codeine use, misuse and dependence, final report.Brussels: CODEMISUSED Project European Commission 7th Framework Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (2014). The interview in Q methodology: Readiness to adopt sustainable responses to climate change. SAGE Research Methods Cases. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/978144627305014539121
   Google Scholar