The impact of inherent and environmental factors on surgical performance in laparoscopy: a review

References

• Kelling G. Munch Med Wochenschr 1901;49:259.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobaeus HC. Munch Med Wochenschr 1910;58: 2090.
   Google Scholar
• Kalk H. Leitfaden der Laparoscopie und Gastroskopie 1951 Stuttgart, Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Zollikofer R. Zur Laparoskopie. Schweiz Med Wochen- schr 1924;54:264.
   Google Scholar
• Veress J. Ein neues Instrument zur Ausfu hrung von Brust - oder Bauchpunktionen und Pneumothoraxbe- handlung. Deutsche Med Wochenschr 1938;64:1480.
   Google Scholar
• Schurr M, Breitwieser H, et al. Experimental telemani- pulation in endocsopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:167–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dent T. Training, credentialing, and evaluation in laparo- scopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1992;72:1003–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preminger G. Video imaging and documentation, in S. AD, B. GH, and B.D. et al. (eds). Smith’s textbook of endourology 1996 Quality Medical Publishing: St. Louis. 29–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna G, Shimi S, Cuschieri A. Task performance in endoscopic surgery is infuenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 1998;227:481–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna G, Cuschieri A. Infuence of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging on endoscopic bowel sutur- ing. World J Surg 2000;24:444–8;discussion 448–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Randomised study of infuence of two-dimensional versus three- dimen- sional imaging on performance of laparoscopic chole- cystectomy. Lancet 1998;351:248–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosthwaite G, Chung T et al. Comparison of direct vision and electronic two-and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1995;82:849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A, Chung S et al. Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparsocopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1997;2:315.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall EM, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol 1996;10:371–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D, Brewer J, Soper N. The infuence of 3-dimen- sional videosystems on laparoscopic performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:191–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van-Bergen P, Kunert W et al. Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 1998;12:948–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Pichler C, et al. Three-dimensional versus two- dimensional video endoscopy. A clinical field study in laparoscopic application. Stud Health Technol Inform 1996;29:667–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babayan R, et al. The comparison between 2-dimen- sional and 3-dimensional laparoscopic video systems in a pelvic trainer. J Endourol 1993;7:S195.
   Google Scholar
• Robles-De-La-Torre G, Hayward V. Force can over- come object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 2001;412:445–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bholat O, et al. Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:349–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards C, et al. Skills evaluation in minimally invasive surgery using force/torque signatures. Surg Endosc 2000;14:791–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane M, et al. Force-feedback grasper helps restore sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 1999;3:278–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham K, Dreary I. A role for aptitude testing in surgery? J R Coll Surg Edin 1991;36:70–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanna GB, et al. Psychomotor skills for endoscopic manipulations: differing abilities between right and left- handed individuals. Ann Surg 1997;225:333–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman A, Adevai G, McGough W. Some relation- ships between handedness and perception. J Psycho- som Res 1966;10:151–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E. Handedness and the pattern of human ability. Br J Psychol 1971;62:111–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee M. Laterality, hand preference and human spatial ability. Percept Mot Skills 1976;42:781–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe F, Ratcliffe G. Handedness, speech later- alization and ability. Neuropsychologia 1973;11:399– 407.
   Google Scholar
• Schueneman AL, Pickleman J, Freeark RJ. Age, gender, lateral dominance, and prediction of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery 1985;98:506–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock R, Kolakowski D. Further evidence of sex-linked major-gene infuence on human spatial visualizing ability. Amer J Hum Genet 1970;25:1.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons RD, Baker RJ, Skinner DB. Field articulation testing: a predictor of technical skills in surgical residents. J Surg Res 1986;41:53–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson D, Kertzman C. Visuospatial attention: effects of age, gender and spatial reference. Neuropsycho- logia 1990;28:291–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges M, Diamond D. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 1999;177:28–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele R, Walder C, Herbert M. Psychomotor testing and the ability to perform an anastomosis in junior surgical trainees. Br J Surg 1992;79:1065–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueneman AL, et al. Neuropsychologic predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents. Sur- gery 1984;96:288–95.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch J, et al. Can a simple test of visual-motor skill predict the performance of microsurgeons? J R Coll Surg Edin 1994;39:150–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leitman I, Risucci D, Tortolani A. Teaching laparo- scopic surgical skills to general surgery residents: Development of an individualized instructional ap- proach. Focus Surg Educ 1994;11:20–2.
   Google Scholar
• Risucci D, et al. Experience and visual perception in resident acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Curr Surg 2000;57:368–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francis N, Hanna G, Cuschieri A. The performance of master surgeons on standard aptitude testing. Am J Surg: inpress.
   Google Scholar
• Long G. Rod and frame test performance among naval aviation personnel. Percept Mot Skills 1975;41:950–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris CJ, Herbert M, Steele RJ. Psychomotor skills of surgical trainees compared with those of different medical specialists. Br J Surg 1994;81:382–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire D, et al. 0bjective comparison of manual dexterity in physicians and surgeons. Can J Surg 1989;32:467–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffin J. Purdue Pegboard Examiner Manual 1968 Chicago, Ill: Science Research Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Manual dexterity Test 32023 (4207)1969 Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, Ind.
   Google Scholar
• Loo RVD. Selection of surgicals. trainees in The Nether- lands. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988;70:277–9.
   Google Scholar