Microtechnologies in medicine: An overview

References:

• Menz W., Buess G. Potential applications of microsystems engineering in minimal invasive surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1993; 1: 171–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menz W., Guber A. Microstructure technologies and their potential in medical applications. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1994; 37: 21–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner B. Principles of development and design of microsystems. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1995; 3: 204–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federspil P. A., Plinkert P. K. Restoring hearing with active hearing implants. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2004; 4: 78–82
   Google Scholar
• Grabiec P., Domanski K., Janus P., Zaborowski M., et al. Microsystem technology as a road from macro to nanoworld. Bioelectrochemistry 2005; 66: 23–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildau H. J. Wireless remote monitoring for patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Electrocardiol 2004; 37(Suppl)53–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhisitkul R. B., Keller C. G. Development of Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) forceps for intraocular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1586–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C. H., Lee G. B. Automatic bio‐sampling chips integrated with micro‐pumps and micro‐valves for disease detection. Biosens Bioelectron 2005; 15: 419–25
   Google Scholar
• Kudo H., Sawada T., Kazawa E., Yoshida H., et al. A flexible and wearable glucose sensor based on functional polymers with soft‐MEMS techniques. Biosens Bioelectron 2006; 22: 558–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebello K. Applications of MEMS in surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE 2004; 92((1))
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schostek S., Fischer H., Kalanovic D., Schurr M. O. Microsystems in medicine ‐ results of an international survey. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2005; 14: 360–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong C. M., van Dijk P. J., Laing I. A. A comparison of transcutaneous bilirubinometers: SpectRx BiliCheck versus Minolta AirShields. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 87: F137–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y., Mather E. L., Bell J. L., Madou M. MEMS‐based sample preparation for molecular diagnostics. Anal Bioanal Chem 2002; 372: 49–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples M., Daniel K., Cima M. J., Langer R. Application of Micro‐ and Nano‐Electromechanical Devices to Drug Delivery. Pharm Res 2006, (in press)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y., Shawgo R. S., Tyler B., Henderson P. T., et al. In vivo release from a drug delivery MEMS device. J Control Release. 2004; 100: 211–9
   Google Scholar
• Zahn J. D., Deshmukh A., Pisano A. P., Liepmann D. Continuous on‐chip micropumping for microneedle enhanced drug delivery. Biomed Microdevices 2004; 6: 183–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhisitkul R. B., Keller C. G. Development of Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) forceps for intraocular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1586–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr M. O., Heyn S. P., Menz W., Buess G. Endosystems – future perspectives for endoluminal therapy. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1996; 13: 37–42
   Google Scholar
• Schostek S., Ho C. N., Kalanovic D., Schurr M. O. Artificial tactile sensing in minimally invasive surgery ‐ a new technical approach. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2006; 15: 296–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George M., Albrecht H. J., Schurr M. O., Papageorgas P., et al. A laser‐scanning endoscope base on monosilicon micromachined mirrors with enhanced attributes. 5143, Novel Optical Instrumentation for Biomedical Applications Proc. SPIE, Volume 2003
   Google Scholar
• George M. optical methods and sensors for in situ histology and endoscopy. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol 2004; 13: 95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piyawattanametha W., Barretto R. P., Ko T. H., Flusberg B. A., et al. Fast‐scanning two‐photon fluorescence imaging based on a microelectromechanical systems two‐ dimensional scanning mirror. Opt Lett 2006; 31: 2018–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshak A., Arshak K., Waldron D., Morris D., et al. Review of the potential of a wireless MEMS and TFT microsystems for the measurement of pressure in the GI tract. Med Eng Phys 2005; 27: 347–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong F., Swain P., Mills T. Wireless endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 725–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triester S. L., Leighton J. A., Leontiadis G. I., Gurudu S. R., et al. A meta‐analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non‐stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 954–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunoury V., Savoye G., Bourreille A., Bouhnik Y., et al. Value of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with indeterminate colitis (inflammatory bowel disease type unclassified). Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006, (in press)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton J. A. Recent advances in endoscopic capsule imaging: see what we have been missing. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2006; 6(Suppl 1)S19–27
   Google Scholar
• Moglia A., Menciassi A., Schurr M. O., Dario P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: from diagnostic devices to multipurpose robotic systems. Biomed Microdevices 2006, (in press)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menciassi A., Dario P. Bio‐inspired solutions for locomotion in the gastrointestinal tract: background and perspectives. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 2003; 361: 2287–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo J., Yan G., Gao Z. A micro creeping robot for colonoscopy based on the earthworm. J Med Eng Technol 2005; 29: 1–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dario P., Carrozza M. C., Pietrabissa A. Development and in vitro testing of a miniature robotic system for computer‐assisted colonoscopy. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4: 1–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phee L., Accoto D., Menciassi A., Stefanini C., et al. Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002; 49: 613–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi D., Yan G. From wired to wireless: a miniature robot for intestinal inspection. J Med Eng Technol 2003; 27: 71–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renard E. Implantable insulin delivery pumps. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2004; 13: 328–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacheja J., Wenzel D., Bach T., Clasbrummel B. Micromechanical pressure sensors for medical evaluation of blood vessels and bypasses after surgical intervention. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1998; 43(Suppl)182–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ericson M. N., Wilson M. A., Cote G. L., Baba J. S., et al. Implantable sensor for blood flow monitoring after transplant surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2004; 13: 87–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clasbrummel B., Muhr G., Moellenhoff G. Pressure sensors for the monitoring of diseases in surgical care. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2004; 13: 105–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H., Haller D., Echtle D. Minimally invasive pressure sensor for telemetric recording of intravesical pressure in the human. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2002; 47(Suppl 1 Pt 1)338–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellozy S. H., Carroccio A., Lookstein R. A., Minor M. E., et al. First experience in human beings with a permanently implantable intrasac pressure transducer for monitoring endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 405–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedbergh B., Backlund Y., Hok B., Rosengren L. The IOP‐IOL. A probe into the eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1992; 70: 266–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laube T., Schanze T., Brockmann C., Bolle I., et al. Chronically implanted epidural electrodes in Gottinger minipigs allow function tests of epiretinal implants. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241: 1013–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland J. D., Liu W., Humayun M. S. Retinal prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005; 7: 361–401
   Google Scholar
• Walter P., Mokwa W. Epiretinal visual prostheses. Ophthalmologe 2005; 102: 933–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gekeler F., Szurman P., Grisanti S., Weiler U., et al. Compound subretinal prostheses with extra‐ocular parts designed for human trials: successful long‐term implantation in pigs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006, (in press)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz T., Schuettler M., Koch K. P. Neural prostheses in clinical applications–trends from precision mechanics towards biomedical microsystems in neurological rehabilitation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2004; 49: 72–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haga Y., Matsunaga T., Makishi W., Totsu K., et al. Minimally invasive diagnostics and treatment using micro/nano machining. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2006; 15: 218–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H., Hutmacher D. W., Chollet F., Poo A. N., et al. Microrobotics and MEMS‐based fabrication techniques for scaffold‐based tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 2005; 5: 477–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aponte V. M., Finch D. S., Klaus D. M. Considerations for non‐invasive in‐flight monitoring of astronaut immune status with potential use of MEMS and NEMS devices. Life Sci 2006; 79: 1317–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuder K., Dehm J. Technical standards for microsensors in surgery and minimally invasive therapy. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2004; 13: 110–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalanovic D., Schurr M. O. Innovation requirements for telemetric sensor systems in medicine: results of a survey in Germany. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2004; 13: 68–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar