Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision

References

• Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2014;259:443–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dongen KW, Tournoij E, van der Zee DC, Schijven MP, Broeders IA. Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 2007;21:1413–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA, III, et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 2007;193:797–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Development and validation of a comprehensive curriculum to teach an advanced minimally invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2012;256:25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst K, Strickland A, Maddern G. The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven. Surg Endosc 2011;25:343–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneist W, Huber T, Paschold M, Lang H. [3D virtual reality laparoscopic simulation in surgical education – results of a pilot study]. Zentralbl Chir 2016;141:297–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapenstad C, Hofstad EF, Bo LE, Chmarra MK, Kuhry E, Johnsen G, et al. Limitations of haptic feedback devices on construct validity of the LapSim® virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc 2013;27:1386–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1180–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg 2007;31:764–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, Jakimowicz JJ. The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1214–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapenstad C, Hofstad EF, Lango T, Marvik R, Chmarra MK. Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2391–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debes AJ, Aggarwal R, Balasundaram I, Jacobsen MB. A tale of two trainers: virtual reality versus a video trainer for acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2010;199:840–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palter VN, Orzech N, Aggarwal R, Okrainec A, Grantcharov TP. Resident perceptions of advanced laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2830–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty S, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP, Roberts KE, Duffy AJ. Perceptions, training experiences, and preferences of surgical residents toward laparoscopic simulation training: a resident survey. J Surg Educ 2014;71:727–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2013;257:586–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Grosdemouge C, Arikatla VS, Ahn W, Sankaranarayanan G, De S, et al. The added value of virtual reality technology and force feedback for surgical training simulators. Work 2012;41 Suppl 1:2288–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strom P, Hedman L, Sarna L, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L. Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1383–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkini MW, Doarn CR, Kiehl N, Broderick TJ, Donovan JF, Gaitonde K. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. J Endourol 2010;24:99–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles TR, Meglan D, John NW. The role of haptics in medical training simulators: a survey of the state of the art. IEEE Trans Haptics 2011;4:51–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susmitha WK, Devasahayam SR, Manivannan M, Mathew G. Force model for laparoscopic graspers: implications for virtual simulator design. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2016. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1252779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmarra MK, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW. Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2140–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panait L, Akkary E, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Dudrick SJ, Duffy AJ. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J Surg Res 2009;156:312–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2016;30:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner JG, Hathaway CA, Brown JA. [Not Available]. J Minim Access Surg 2008;4:31–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaGrange CA, Clark CJ, Gerber EW, Strup SE. Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy. J Endourol 2008;22:511–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry M, Roach VA, Wilson TD. Application of stereoscopic visualization on surgical skill acquisition in novices. J Surg Educ 2013;70:563–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakata S, Watson MO, Grove PM, Stevenson AR. The conflicting evidence of three-dimensional displays in laparoscopy: a review of systems old and new. Ann Surg 2016;263:234–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LG. 3D FPR Technology Never Loses Its Value. 2014. Available at: http://www.lgnewsroom.com/2011/01/lg-electronics-cinema-3d-technology-creates-movie-theater-experience-at-home/2014. Available at: http://lgdnewsroom.com/products-solutions/tv/4251.
   Google Scholar
• G-coder. G-coder sensor technology. 2015. Available at: http://g-coder.com/technology. [Accessed February 04, 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Hagelsteen K, Sevonius D, Bergenfelz A, Ekelund M. Simball box for laparoscopic training with advanced 4D motion analysis of skills. Surg Innov 2016;23:309–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenthaler M, Schnell D, Wilhelm K, Schlager D, Adams F, Hein S, et al. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model. World J Urol 2016;34:471–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf A, Collins D, Whelan M, O'Sullivan R, Balfe P. Three-dimensional (3D) simulation versus two-dimensional (2D) enhances surgical skills acquisition in standardised laparoscopic tasks: a before and after study. Int J Surg 2015;14:12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaraimi B, El Bakbak W, Sarker S, Makkiyah S, Al-Marzouq A, Goriparthi R, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy. World J Surg 2014;38:2746–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF. Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 2008;32:110–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedel C, Bjerrum F, Mahmood B, Sorensen JL, Strandbygaard J. Medical students as facilitators for laparoscopic simulator training. J Surg Educ 2015;72:446–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar