24
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

From 3D to 2D-4K laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: are we addicted to technology?

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Received 17 May 2023, Accepted 04 Apr 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

References

  • Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376.
  • Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomised study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1418–1422. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70084-4.
  • Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Scambia G, et al. The use of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(4):376–380. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000175355.48802.7b.
  • Paraiso MFR, Walters MD, Rackley RR, et al. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1752–1758. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.051.
  • Fanfani F, Rossitto C, Restaino S, et al. How technology can impact surgeon performance: a randomized trial comparing 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopy in gynecology oncology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(5):810–817. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.020.
  • Zwimpfer TA, Lacher D, Fellmann-Fischer B, et al. A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00892-8.
  • Mari GM, Crippa J, Achilli P, et al. 4K ultra HD technology reduces operative time and intraoperative blood loss in colorectal laparoscopic surgery. F1000Res. 2020;9:106. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21297.1.
  • Morciano A, Marzo G, Caliandro D, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and a new approach to mesh fixation: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(5):939–944. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4916-0.
  • Morciano A, Caliandro D, Campagna G, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy plus sacral colpopexy: continuous locked suture for mesh fixation. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;306(5):1573–1579. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06682-2.
  • Lizee D, Campagna G, Morciano A, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: how to place the posterior mesh into rectovaginal space? Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(6):1529–1534. doi: 10.1002/nau.23106.
  • Powell CR, Tachibana I, Eckrich B, et al. Securing mesh with delayed absorbable suture does not increase risk of prolapse recurrence after robotic sacral colpopexy. J Endourol. 2021;35(6):944–949. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0029.
  • Bump RC, Mattiasson Bø AK, Brubaker LP, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–17. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.
  • Morciano A, Marzo G, Caliandro D, et al. Altis® adjustable single incision sling system for treatment of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: a 3-year follow-up observational study. Urogynecology (Hagerstown). 2022;28:500–505.
  • Morciano A, Ercoli A, Caliandro D, et al. Laparoscopic posterior vaginal plication plus sacral colpopexy for severe posterior vaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(1):98–105. doi: 10.1002/nau.25052.
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
  • Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523–528. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5.
  • Suarez-Ibarrola R, Kriegmair M, Waldbillig F, et al. A novel endoimaging system for endoscopic 3D reconstruction in bladder cancer patients. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(1):34–41. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1761833.
  • Singla V, Bhattacharjee HK, Gupta E, et al. Performance of three-dimensional and ultra-high-definition (4K) technology in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18(2):167–175. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_122_21.
  • Degirmenci Y, Schepers M, Steetskamp J, et al. Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional endoscopic approach in urogynecology: a retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023;49(3):1028–1035. doi: 10.1111/jog.15524.
  • Ercoli A, Campagna G, Delmas V, et al. Anatomical insights into sacrocolpopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(7):813–818. doi: 10.1002/nau.22806.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.