Advanced search
Publication Cover
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Latest Articles
Submit an article Journal homepage
55
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Lateral versus anterior approach for bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate urinary continence and surgical margins

Marco OderdaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Alessandro MarquisDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Alberto SasiaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Giorgio CallerisDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Alessandro DematteisDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Daniele D’AgateDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Marco FalconeDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Federico LavagnoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Giancarlo Marra
,
Gabriele MontefuscoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
&
Paolo GonteroDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
 show all
Received 02 Feb 2024, Accepted 14 May 2024, Published online: 25 Jun 2024

References

  • Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol. 2016;70(2):301–311. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026.
  • Moschovas MC, Bhat S, Onol FF, et al. Modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation improves early postoperative functional recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a propensity score–matched analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;78(6):875–884. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041.
  • Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405–417. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045.
  • Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, et al. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol. 2010;58(3):457–461. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008.
  • Barakat B, Othman H, Gauger U, et al. Retzius sparing radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which technique is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients (MASTER Study)? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(4):1060–1071. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003.
  • Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, et al. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(1):72–80. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025.
  • Salazar A, Regis L, Planas J, et al. A randomised controlled trial to assess the benefit of posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction in early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022;5(4):460–463. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.005.
  • Manfredi M, Checcucci E, Fiori C, et al. Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures. BJU Int. 2019;124(3):477–486. doi:10.1111/bju.14716.
  • Wagaskar VG, Mittal A, Sobotka S, et al. Hood technique for robotic radical prostatectomy—preserving periurethral anatomical structures in the space of retzius and sparing the pouch of douglas, enabling early return of continence without compromising surgical margin rates. Eur Urol. 2021;80(2):213–221. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.044.
  • Patel VR, Coelho RF, Rocco B, et al. Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol. 2011;186(2):511–516. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.112.
  • Asimakopoulos AD, Mugnier C, Hoepffner JL, et al. Surgery illustrated – focus on details. Bladder neck preservation during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a standardised technique using a lateral approach. BJU Int. 2012;110(10):1566–1571. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11604.x.
  • Lee S, Kim KB, Jo KJ, et al. Prognostic Value of Focal Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14(4):e313-9–e319. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2015.12.013.
  • Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(5):702–707. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032.
  • Gu X, Araki M, Wong C. Continence outcomes after bladder neck preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(6):364–371. doi:10.3109/13645706.2015.1027711.
  • Freire MP, Weinberg AC, Lei Y, et al. Anatomic Bladder Neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009;56(6):972–980. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.017.
  • Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. Urology. 2003;61(4):699–702. doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02543-8.
  • Srivastava A, Chopra S, Pham A, et al. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;63(3):438–444. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.009.
  • Michl U, Tennstedt P, Feldmeier L, et al. Nerve-sparing surgery technique, not the preservation of the neurovascular bundles, leads to improved long-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69(4):584–589. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.037.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.