Combustion mechanism of ultralean rotating counterflow twin premixed flame

References

• Y.L. Shoshin and L.P.H. De Goey, Experimental study of lean flammability limits of methane/hydrogen/air mixtures in tubes of different diameters, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 34 (2010), pp. 373–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.K. Law, Combustion Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006, pp. 346–353.
   Google Scholar
• D. Dunn-Rankin (ed.), Lean Combustion – Technology and Control, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• F.J. Weinberg, Combustion temperatures: the future?, Nature 233 (1971), pp. 239–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Katsuki and T. Hasegawa, The science and technology of combustion in highly preheated air, Proc. Combust. Inst. 27 (1998), pp. 3135–3146.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ju and K. Maruta, Microscale combustion: Technology development and fundamental research, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 37 (2011), pp. 669–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wood and A.T. Harris, Porous burners for lean-burn applications, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 34 (2008), pp. 667–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mastorakos, A.M.K.P. Taylor, and J.H. Whitelaw, Extinction of turbulent counterflow flames with reactants diluted by hot products, Combust. Flame 102 (1995), pp. 101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Cheng, J.A. Wehrmeyer, and R.W. Pitz, Lean or ultra-lean stretched planar methane/air flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 285–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Cheng, R. Pitz, and J. Wehrmeyer, Lean and ultralean stretched propane–air counterflow flames, Combust. Flame 145 (2006), pp. 647–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Smooke and V. Giovangigli, A comparison between experimental measurements and numerical calculations of the structure of premixed rotating counterflow methane–air flames, Proc. 24th Symp. (Int.) Combust. 24 (1992), pp. 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Z.H. Chen, G.E. Liu, and S.H. Sohrab, Premixed Flames in Counterflow Jets Under Rigid-Body Rotation, Combust. Sci. Technol. 51 (1987), pp. 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.I. Sivashinsky and S.H. Sohrab, SHORT COMMUNICATION The Influence of Rotation on Premixed Lames in Stagnation-Point Flow, Combust. Sci. Technol. 53 (1987), pp. 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Libby, F.A. Williams, and G.I. Sivashinsky, Influences of swirl on the structure and extinction of strained premixed flames. Part I: Moderate rates of rotation, Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dynam. 2 (7) (1990), pp. 1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Kim, P.A. Libby, and F.A. Williams, Influences of swirl on the structure and extinction of strained premixed flames. Part II: Strong rates of rotation, Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dynam. 4 (7) (1992), pp. 391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Tien and M. Matalon, Effect of swirl on strained premixed flames for mixtures with Lewis number distinct from unity, Combust. Sci. Technol. 87 (1993), pp. 257–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nishioka, Z. Shen, and A. Uemichi, Ultra-lean combustion through the backflow of burned gas in rotating counterflow twin premixed flames, Combust. Flame 158 (2011), pp. 2188–2198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Uemichi and M. Nishioka, Numerical study on ultra-lean rotating counterflow twin premixed flame of hydrogen–air, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1135–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.P. Smith, D.M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N.W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C.T. Bowman, R.K. Hanson, S. Song, W.C. Gardiner Jr., V.V. Lissianski, and Z. Qin. Available at http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/.
   Google Scholar
• M.P. Burke, M. Chaos, Y. Ju, F.L. Dryer, and S.J. Klippenstein, Comprehensive H2/O2 kinetic model for high-pressure combustion, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 44 (2012), pp. 444–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Qin, V.V. Lissianski, H. Yang, W.C. Gardiner, S.G. Davis, and H. Wang,, Combustion chemistry of propane: A case study of detailed reaction mechanism optimization, Proc. Combust. Inst. 28 (2000), pp. 1663–1669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.J. Kee, J.F. Grcar, M.D. Smooke, and J.A. Miller, A Fortran program for modeling steady laminar one-dimensional premixed flames., Sandia Report SAND858240, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Kee, G. Dixon-Lewis, J. Warnatz, M.E. Coltrin, and J.A. Miller, A Fortran computer code package for the evaluation of gas-phase, multicomponent transport properties, Sandia Report SAND86-8246, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Kee, F.M. Rupley, and J.A. Miller, The Chemkin Thermodynamic Data Base, Sandia Report SAND89-8009, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Z.H. Chen and S.H. Sohrab, Flammability limit and limit-temperature of counteflow lean methane–air flames, Combust. Flame 102 (1995), pp. 193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Guo, Y. Ju, K. Maruta, T. Niioka, and F. Liu, Radiation extinction limit of counterflow premixed lean methane–air flames, Combust. Flame 109 (1997), pp. 639–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.A. Williams, Combustion Theory, 2nd ed., Benjamin Cummings, 1985, pp. 341–364.
   Google Scholar
• C.K. Law, Dynamics of stretched flames, Proc. 22nd Symp. (Int.) Combust. (1988), pp. 1381–1402.
   Google Scholar
• J.A.M. de Swart, G.R.a. Groot, J.a. van Oijen, J.H.M. ten Thije Boonkkamp, and L.P.H. de Goey, Detailed analysis of the mass burning rate of stretched flames including preferential diffusion effects, Combust. Flame 145 (2006), pp. 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Strehlow, Combustion Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985, pp. 290–296.
   Google Scholar
• D.L. Zhu, F.N. Egolfopoulos, and C.K. Law, Experimental and numerical determination of laminar flame speeds of methane/(Ar, N2, CO2)–air mixtures as function of stoichiometry, pressure, and flame temperature, Proc. 22nd Symp. (Int.) Combust. (1988), pp. 1537–1545.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Kee, J.A. Miller, G.H. Evans, and G. Dixon-Lewis, A computational model of the structure and extinction of strained, opposed flow, premixed methane–air flames, Proc. 22th Symp. (Int.) Combust. (1989), pp. 1479–1494.
   Google Scholar
• M. Nishioka, K. Inagaki, S. Ishizuka, and T. Takeno, Effects of pressure on structure and extinction of tubular flame, Combust. Flame 86 (1991), pp. 90–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J. Sun, C.J. Sung, L. He, and C.K. Law, Dynamics of weakly stretched flames: quantitative description and extraction of global flame parameters, Combust. Flame. 118 (1999), pp. 108–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Uemichi, H. Aizawa, T. Hattori, and M. Nishioka, Numerical Study on Ultra-Lean Combustion by Using Stagnation Flow Swirl Burner, Proc. 24th ICDERS, Taipei, Taiwan (2013).
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Sohrab, Z.Y. Ye, and C.K. Law, An experimental investigation on flame interaction and the existence of negative flame speeds, Proc. 20th Symp. (Int.) Combust. (1984), pp. 1957–1965.
   Google Scholar
• G. Bansal, H.G. Im, and J.K. Bechtold, Flame-flow interactions and flow reversal, Combust. Flame. 159 (2012), pp. 1489–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Upatnieks, J.F. Driscoll, and S.L. Ceccio, Cinema particle imaging velocimetry time history of the propagation velocity of the base of a lifted turbulent jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002), pp. 1897–1903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar