A normalised residence time transport equation for the numerical simulation of combustion with high-temperature air

References

• S. Menon and C. Fureby, Computational combustion, in Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, R. Blockley and W. Shyy, eds., Wiley, 2010
   Google Scholar
• B.B. Dally, A.N. Karpetis and R.S. Barlow, Structure of turbulent non-premixed flames in a diluted hot coflow, Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002), pp. 1147–1154. doi: 10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80145-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Cabra, T. Myhrvold, J.Y. Chen and R.W. Dibble, Simultaneous laser Raman-Rayleigh-LIF measurements and numerical modeling results of a lifted turbulent H2/N2 jet flame in a vitiated coflow, Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002), pp. 1881–1888. doi: 10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80228-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Cabra, J.Y. Chen, R.W. Dibble, A.N. Karpetis and R.S. Barlow, Lifted methane air jet flames in a vitiated coflow, Combust. Flame 143 (2005), pp. 491–506. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.B. Zel'dovich, G.I. Barenblatt, V.B. Librovich, and G.M. Makhviladze, Mathematical theory of combustion and explosions, Plenum Publishing Corporation, San Diego, CA (USA), 1985.
   Google Scholar
• C.N. Markides and E. Mastorakos, An experimental study of hydrogen autoignition in a turbulent co-flow of heated air, Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 883–891. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mastorakos, Ignition of turbulent non-premixed flames, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 35 (2009), pp. 57–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Oldenhof, M.J. Tummers, E.H. Van Veen and D.J.E.M. Roekaerts, Ignition kernel formation and lift-off behaviour of jet-in-hot-coflow flames, Combust. Flame 157 (2010), pp. 1167–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lamige, J. Min, C. Galizzi, F. André, F. Baillot, D. Escudié and K.M. Lyons, On preheating and dilution effects in non-premixed jet flame stabilization, Combust. Flame 160 (2013), pp. 1102–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Gomet, V. Robin and A. Mura, A multiple-inlet mixture fraction model for non-premixed combustion, Combust. Flame 162 (2015), pp. 668–687. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.Q.N. Kha, C. Losier, V. Robin, A. Mura and M. Champion, Relevance of two basic turbulent premixed combustion models for the numerical simulations of V-shaped flames, Combust. Sci. Tech. 188 (2016), pp. 1878–1903. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2016.1211866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Gomet, V. Robin and A. Mura, Influence of residence and scalar mixing time scales in non-premixed combustion in supersonic turbulent flows, Combust. Sci. Tech. 184 (2012), pp. 1471–1501. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2012.690259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mouangue, M. Obounou, L. Gomet and A. Mura, Lagrangian intermittent modelling of a turbulent lifted methane-air jet flame stabilized in a vitiated air co-flow, Flow, Turb. Combust. 92 (2014), pp. 731–765. doi: 10.1007/s10494-013-9512-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Ghirelli and B. Leckner, Transport equation for the local residence time of a fluid, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 (2004), pp. 513–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2003.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Shin, R.D. Sandberg and E.S. Richardson, Self-similarity of fluid residence time statistics in a turbulent round jet, J. Fluid Mech. 823 (2017), pp. 1–25. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2017.304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.G. Goodwin, H.K. Moffat and R.L. Speth, Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes, http://www.cantera.org (2017). Version 2.3.0
   Google Scholar
• S. Serra, V. Robin, A. Mura and M. Champion, Density variations effects in turbulent diffusion flames: modeling of unresolved fluxes, Combust. Sci. Tech. 186 (2014), pp. 1370–1391. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2014.934605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code_Saturne user guides, http://code-saturne.org/cms/documentation/guides (2016). Version 3.2.1
   Google Scholar
• O. Schulz, T. Jaravel, T. Poinsot, B. Cuenot and N. Noiray, A criterion to distinguish autoignition and propagation applied to a lifed methane-air jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 36 (2017), pp. 1637–1644. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Smith, D. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C.T. Bowman, R.K. Hanson, S. Song, W. Gardiner, V. Lissianski and Q. Z., http://combustion.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/
   Google Scholar
• I.S. Kim and E. Mastorakos, Simulations of turbulent lifted jet flames with two-dimensional conditional moment closure, Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (2005), pp. 911–918. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mura and F.X. Demoulin, Lagrangian intermittent modelling of turbulent lifted flames, Combust. Theory Modell. 11 (2007), pp. 223–253. doi: 10.1080/13647830600967071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Vervisch, P. Domingo, M. Rullaud and R. Hauguel, Three facets of turbulent combustion modeling: DNS of premixed V-flame, LES of lifted jet-flame, RANS of non premixed jet-flame, J. Turbul. 5 (2004), pp. 1–36. doi: 10.1088/1468-5248/5/1/004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.Q.N. Kha, V. Robin, A. Mura and M. Champion, Implications of laminar flame finite thickness on the structure of turbulent premixed flames, J. Fluid Mech. 787 (2016), pp. 116–147. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.N.C. Bray and J.B. Moss, A unified statistical model of the premixed turbulent flame, Acta. Astronaut. 4 (1977), pp. 291–319. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(77)90053-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mura, V. Robin, K.Q.N. Kha and M. Champion, A layered description of a premixed flame stabilized in stagnating turbulence, Combust. Sci. Technol. 188 (2016), pp. 1592–1618. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2016.1195822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mura and R. Borghi, Introducing a new partial PDF approach for turbulent combustion modeling, Combust. Flame 136 (2004), pp. 377–382. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.10.004
   Google Scholar
• G. Ribert, K. Wang and L. Vervisch, A multi-zone self similar chemistry tabulation with application to auto-ignition including cool-flames effects, Fuel 91 (2012), pp. 87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sandberg, What is ventilation efficiency?, Buil. Environ. 16 (1981), pp. 123–135. doi: 10.1016/0360-1323(81)90028-7
   Google Scholar
• J.N. Balo and P.L. Cloirec, Validating a prediction method of mean residence time spatial distributions, AIChE J. 46 (2000), pp. 675–683. doi: 10.1002/aic.690460403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Strozzi, J. Sotton, A. Mura and M. Bellenoue, Experimental and numerical study of the influence of temperature heterogeneities on self-ignition process of methane-air mixtures in a rapid compression machine, Combust. Sci. Technol. 180 (2008), pp. 1829–1857. doi: 10.1080/00102200802260656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Strozzi, A. Mura, J. Sotton and M. Bellenoue, Experimental analysis of propagation regimes during the autoignition of a fully premixed methaneair mixture in the presence of temperature inhomogeneities, Combust. Flame 159 (2012), pp. 3323–3341. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mastorakos, T.A. Baritaud and T.J. Poinsot, Numerical simulations of autoignition in turbulent mixing flows, Combust. Flame 109 (1997), pp. 198–223. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(96)00149-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bhagatwala, J.H. Chen and T. Lu, Direct numerical simulations of HCCI/SACI with ethanol, Combust. Flame 161 (2014), pp. 1826–1841. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Vicquelin, Tabulation de la cintique chimique pour la modlisation et la simulation de la combustion turbulente, Ph.D. diss., Ecole Centrale Paris, 2010
   Google Scholar
• M.Ó. Conaire, H.J. Curran, J.M. Simmie, W.J. Pitz and C.K. Westbrook, A comprehensive modeling study of hydrogen oxidation, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 36 (2004), pp. 603–622. doi: 10.1002/kin.20036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mercier, T. Schmitt, D. Veynante and B. Fiorina, The influence of combustion sgs submodels on the resolved flame propagation. application to the LES of the cambridge stratified flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 1259–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.A. Catlin and R.P. Lindstedt, Premixed turbulent burning velocities derived from mixing controlled reaction models with cold front quenching, Combust. Flame 85 (1991), pp. 427–439. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(91)90145-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.A. Sabelnikov, C. Corvellec and P. Bruel, Analysis of the influence of cold front quenching on the turbulent burning velocity associated with an eddy-break-up model., Combust. Flame, 113 (1998), pp. 492–497. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00234-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.H. Shin, E.S. Richardson, V. Aparece-Scutariu, Y. Minamoto and J.H. Chen, Fluid age-based analysis of a lifted turbulent DME jet flame DNS, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 2215–2222. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.126
   Google Scholar