An exponential distribution scheme for the two-way coupling in transported PDF method for dilute spray combustion

References

• S. Elghobashi and G.C. Truesdell, On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. I: turbulence modification, Phys. Fluids A 5 (1993), pp. 1790–1801. doi: 10.1063/1.858854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.M. Faeth, Mixing, transport and combustion in sprays, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 13 (1987), pp. 293–345. doi: 10.1016/0360-1285(87)90002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Jenny, D. Roekaerts and N. Beishuizen, Modeling of turbulent dilute spray combustion, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38 (2012), pp. 846–887. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Masri, Turbulent combustion of sprays: from dilute to dense. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188 (2016), pp. 1619–1639. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2016.1198788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-W. Ge and E. Gutheil, Simulation of a turbulent spray flame using coupled PDF gas phase and spray flamelet modeling, Combust. Flame 153 (2008), pp. 173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Heye, V. Raman and A.R. Masri, LES/probability density function approach for the simulation of an ethanol spray flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1633–1641. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. O’Loughlin and A.R. Masri, A new burner for studying auto-ignition in turbulent dilute sprays, Combust. Flame 158 (2011), pp. 1577–1590. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Gounder, A. Kourmatzis and A.R. Masri, Turbulent piloted dilute spray flames: flow fields and droplet dynamics, Combust. Flame 159 (2012), pp. 3372–3397. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. De and S.H. Kim, Large eddy simulation of dilute reacting sprays: droplet evaporation and scalar mixing, Combust. Flame 160 (2013), pp. 2048–2066. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ukai, A. Kronenburg and O.T. Stein, Large eddy simulation of dilute acetone spray flames using CMC coupled with tabulated chemistry, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 1667–1674. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.O. Fox, Large-eddy-simulation tools for multiphase flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44 (2012), pp. 47–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.P. Jones and D.H. Sheen, A probability density function method for modelling liquid fuel sprays, Flow Turbul. Combust. 63 (2000), pp. 379–394. doi: 10.1023/A:1009984220148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.W. Ge, I. Düwel, H. Kronemayer, R.W. Dibble, E. Gutheil, C. Schulz and J. Wolfrum, Laser-based experimental and Monte Carlo PDF numerical investigation of an ethanol/air spray flame, Combust. Sci. Technol. 180 (2008), pp. 1529–1547. doi: 10.1080/00102200802125693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Heye, V. Raman and A.R. Masri, Influence of spray/combustion interactions on auto-ignition of methanol spray flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 1639–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.N. Prasad, A.R. Masri, S. Navarro-Martinez and K.H. Luo, Investigation of auto-ignition in turbulent methanol spray flames using large eddy simulation, Combust. Flame 160 (2013), pp. 2941–2954. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.D. Pierce and P. Moin, Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion, J. Fluid Mech. 504 (2004), pp. 73–97. doi: 10.1017/S0022112004008213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Pera, J. Reveillon, L. Vervisch and P. Domingo, Modeling subgrid scale mixture fraction variance in LES of evaporating spray, Combust. Flame 146 (2006), pp. 635–648. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Mashayek, Droplet–turbulence interactions in low-Mach-number homogeneous shear two-phase flows, J. Fluid Mech. 367 (1998), pp. 163–203. doi: 10.1017/S0022112098001414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C.-K. Tang, Modelling of multiphase flames using direct numerical simulation and transported PDF methods, Ph. D thesis, University of New South Wales, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11 (1985), pp. 119–192. doi: 10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhou, S. Li, Z. Ren and D.H. Rowinski, Investigation of mixing model performance in transported PDF calculations of turbulent lean premixed jet flames through Lagrangian statistics and sensitivity analysis, Combust. Flame 181 (2017), pp. 136–148. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.C. Haworth, Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36 (2010), pp. 168–259. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zhu, K.N.C. Bray, O. Rumberg and B. Rogg, PDF transport equations for two-phase reactive flows and sprays, Combust. Flame 122 (2000), pp. 327–338. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00127-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C.K. Tang, H. Wang, M. Bolla, A. Wehrfritz and E.R. Hawkes, A DNS evaluation of mixing and evaporation models for TPDF modelling of nonpremixed spray flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 3363–3372. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Naud, PDF modeling of turbulent sprays and flames using a particle stochastic approach, Ph. D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• N.A. Beishuizen, PDF modelling and particle-turbulence interaction of turbulent spray flames, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• S. James, M. Anand, and S. Pope, The Lagrangian PDF transport method for simulations of gas turbine combustor flows, 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Indianapolis, IN, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• J. Villermaux, and J.C. Devillon, Représentation de la Coalescence et de la Redispersion des Domaines de Ségrégation Dans un Fluide Par un Modèle D’interaction Phénoménologique, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Chemical Reaction Engineering, New York, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, Self-conditioned fields for large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 652 (2010), pp. 139–169. doi: 10.1017/S0022112009994174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Khan, M.J. Cleary, O.T. Stein and A. Kronenburg, A two-phase MMC–LES model for turbulent spray flames, Combust. Flame 193 (2018), pp. 424–439. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Viswanathan, H. Wang and S.B. Pope, Numerical implementation of mixing and molecular transport in LES/PDF studies of turbulent reacting flows, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011), pp. 6916–6957. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Hollmann and E. Gutheil, Diffusion flames based on a laminar spray flame Library, Combust. Sci. Technol. 135 (1998), pp. 175–192. doi: 10.1080/00102209808924156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.W. Vreman, An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: algebraic theory and applications, Phys. Fluids 16 (2004), pp. 3670–3681. doi: 10.1063/1.1785131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.M. Faeth, Evaporation and combustion of sprays, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 9 (1983), pp. 1–76. doi: 10.1016/0360-1285(83)90005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Abramzon and W.A. Sirignano, Droplet vaporization model for spray combustion calculations, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 32 (1989), pp. 1605–1618. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(89)90043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Knudsen and H. Pitsch, Modeling partially premixed combustion behavior in multiphase LES, Combust. Flame 162 (2015), pp. 159–180. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.S. Miller, K. Harstad and J. Bellan, Evaluation of equilibrium and non-equilibrium evaporation models for many-droplet gas-liquid flow simulations, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 24 (1998), pp. 1025–1055. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(98)00028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Réveillon and L. Vervisch, Spray vaporization in nonpremixed turbulent combustion modeling: a single droplet model, Combust. Flame 121 (2000), pp. 75–90. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00157-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.R. Wilke, A viscosity equation for gas mixtures, J. Chem. Phys. 18 (1950), pp. 517–519. doi: 10.1063/1.1747673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.K. Shen, D.W. Siderius, W.P. Krekelberg, and H.W. Hatch (eds.), NIST Standard Reference Simulation Website, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 173, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Kee, F.M. Rupley and J.A. Miller, Chemkin-II: A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics, Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• C.K. Law, Combustion physics, Cambridge university press, New York, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• C. Verwey and M. Birouk, Fuel vaporization: effect of droplet size and turbulence at elevated temperature and pressure, Combust. Flame 189 (2018), pp. 33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.P. Popov, H. Wang and S.B. Pope, Specific volume coupling and convergence properties in hybrid particle/finite volume algorithms for turbulent reactive flows. J Comput Phys 294 (2015), pp. 110–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, P.P. Popov and S.B. Pope, Weak second-order splitting schemes for Lagrangian Monte Carlo particle methods for the composition PDF/FDF transport equations, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010), pp. 1852–1878. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Brown, G. Byrne and A. Hindmarsh, VODE: a variable-coefficient ODE solver, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 10 (1989), pp. 1038–1051. doi: 10.1137/0910062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.W. Bilger, A mixture fraction framework for the theory and modeling of droplets and sprays, Combust. Flame 158 (2011), pp. 191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation, Combust. Theor. Model. 1 (1997), pp. 41–63. doi: 10.1080/713665229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Lu and S.B. Pope, An improved algorithm for in situ adaptive tabulation, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009), pp. 361–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-C. Wong and A.-C. Lin, Internal temperature distributions of droplets vaporizing in high-temperature convective flows, J. Fluid Mech. 237 (1992), pp. 671–687. doi: 10.1017/S0022112092003574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Nomura, Y. Ujiie, H.J. Rath, J.I. Sato and M. Kono, Experimental study on high-pressure droplet evaporation using microgravity conditions, Symp. (Int.) Combust. 26 (1996), pp. 1267–1273. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80344-4
   Google Scholar
• V. Raghavan, V. Babu, T. Sundararajan and R. Natarajan, Flame shapes and burning rates of spherical fuel particles in a mixed convective environment, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 48 (2005), pp. 5354–5370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, Z. Zhao, A. Kazakov, M. Chaos, F.L. Dryer and J.J. Scire, A comprehensive kinetic mechanism for CO, CH2O, and CH3OH combustion, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 39 (2007), pp. 109–136. doi: 10.1002/kin.20218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.H. Kung, PDF-Based Modeling of Autoignition and Emissions for Advanced Direct-Injection Engines, Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• E.H. Kung and D.C. Haworth, Transported probability density function (tPDF) modeling for direct-injection internal combustion engines, SAE Int. J Engines 1 (2009), pp. 591–606. doi: 10.4271/2008-01-0969
   Google Scholar