Transported PDF simulation of auto-ignition of a turbulent methane jet in a hot, vitiated coflow

References

• T. Kamimoto and H. Kobayashi, Combustion processes in diesel engines, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 17 (1991), pp. 163–189. doi: 10.1016/0360-1285(91)90019-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lechner and J. Seume, Stationäre Gasturbinen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• E. Mastorakos, Ignition of turbulent non-premixed flames, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 35 (2009), pp. 57–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.Y. Klimenko and R.W. Bilger, Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 25 (1999), pp. 595–687. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Colin and J.-B. Michel, A simplified CMC approach based on tabulated reaction rates applied to a lifted methane-air jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 1393–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tyliszczak, LES–CMC study of an excited hydrogen flame, Combust. Flame 162 (2015), pp. 3864–3883. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Stankovic, E. Mastorakos, and B. Merci, LES-CMC simulations of different auto-ignition regimes of hydrogen in a hot turbulent air co-flow, Flow Turbul. Combust. 90 (2013), pp. 583–604. doi: 10.1007/s10494-013-9443-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Stankovic and B. Merci, LES-CMC simulations of a turbulent lifted hydrogen flame in vitiated co-flow, Thermal Sci. 17 (2013), pp. 763–772. doi: 10.2298/TSCI120704035S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tyliszczak, Assessment of implementation variants of conditional scalar dissipation rate in LES–CMC simulation of auto-ignition of hydrogen jet, Arch. Mech. 65 (2013), pp. 97–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Navarro-Martinez and S. Rigopoulos, Large eddy simulation of a turbulent lifted flame using conditional moment closure and rate-controlled constrained equilibrium, Flow Turbul. Combust. 87 (2011), pp. 407–423. doi: 10.1007/s10494-011-9324-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Navarro-Martinez and A. Kronenburg, Flame stabilization mechanisms in lifted flames, Flow Turbul. Combust. 87 (2011), pp. 377–406. doi: 10.1007/s10494-010-9320-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Stankovic, A. Triantafyllidis, E. Mastorakos, C. Lacor, and B. Merci, Simulation of hydrogen auto-ignition in a turbulent co-flow of heated air with LES and CMC approach, Flow Turbul. Combust. 86 (2011), pp. 689–710. doi: 10.1007/s10494-010-9277-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Navarro-Martinez and A. Kronenburg, Analysis of stabilization mechanisms in lifted flames, AIP Conf. Proc. 1190 (2009), pp. 13–38. doi: 10.1063/1.3290166
   Google Scholar
• G. De Paola, I.S. Kim, and E. Mastorakos, Second-order conditional moment closure simulations of autoignition of an n-heptane plume in a turbulent coflow of heated air, Flow Turbul. Combust. 82 (2009), pp. 455–475. doi: 10.1007/s10494-008-9183-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Patwardhan, De Santanu, K.N. Lakshmisha, and B.N. Raghunandan, CMC simulations of lifted turbulent jet flame in a vitiated coflow, Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 1705–1712. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.J.M. Buckrell and C.B. Devaud, Investigation of mixing models and conditional moment closure applied to autoignition of hydrogen jets, Flow Turbul. Combust. 90 (2013), pp. 621–644. doi: 10.1007/s10494-013-9445-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Kim, K.Y. Huh, and R.A. Fraser, Numerical prediction of the autoignition delay in a diesel-like environment by the conditional moment closure model, SAE Technical Papers, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• M. Bolla, D. Farrace, Y.M. Wright, K. Boulouchos, and E. Mastorakos, Influence of turbulence-chemistry interaction for n-heptane spray combustion under diesel engine conditions with emphasis on soot formation and oxidation, Combust. Theory Model. 18 (2014), pp. 330–360. doi: 10.1080/13647830.2014.898795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Bottone, A. Kronenburg, D. Gosman, and A. Marquis, The numerical simulation of diesel spray combustion with LES-CMC, Flow Turbul. Combust. 89 (2012), pp. 651–673. doi: 10.1007/s10494-012-9415-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.M. Wright, O.-N. Margari, K. Boulouchos, G. De Paola, and E. Mastorakos, Experiments and simulations of n-heptane spray auto-ignition in a closed combustion chamber at diesel engine conditions, Flow Turbul. Combust. 84 (2010), pp. 49–78. doi: 10.1007/s10494-009-9224-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Behzadi, M. Bolla, M. Talei, E.R. Hawkes, T. Lucchini, G. D'Errico, and S. Kook, Assessment of conditional moment closure for ignition in compositionally and thermally stratified mixtures, Proceedings of the 10th Asia-Pacific Conference on Combustion, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• N. Peters, Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics, Cambridge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• B. Naud, R. Novella, J.M. Pastor, and J.F. Winklinger, RANS modelling of a lifted H2/N2 flame using an unsteady flamelet progress variable approach with presumed PDF, Combust. Flame 162 (2015), pp. 893–906. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.09.014
   Google Scholar
• C. Han, P. Zhang, T.H. Ye, and Y.L. Chen, Numerical study of methane/air jet flame in vitiated co-flow using tabulated detailed chemistry, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57 (2014), pp. 1750–1760. doi: 10.1007/s11431-014-5604-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Bajaj, M. Ameen, and J. Abraham, Evaluation of an unsteady flamelet progress variable model for autoignition and flame lift-off in diesel jets, Combust. Sci. Technol. 185 (2013), pp. 454–472. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2012.726667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ihme and Y.C. See, Prediction of autoignition in a lifted methane/air flame using an unsteady flamelet/progress variable model, Combust. Flame 157 (2010), pp. 1850–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ihme and Y.C. See, LES flamelet modeling of a three-stream MILD combustor: Analysis of flame sensitivity to scalar inflow conditions, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 1309–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-K. Kim, Y. Yu, J. Ahn, and Y.-M. Kim, Numerical investigation of the autoignition of turbulent gaseous jets in a high-pressure environment using the multiple-RIF model, Fuel 83 (2004), pp. 375–386. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2003.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Stankovic and B. Merci, Analysis of auto-ignition of heated hydrogen-air mixtures with different detailed reaction mechanisms, Combust. Theory Model. 15 (2011), pp. 409–436. doi: 10.1080/13647830.2010.542830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kundu, T. Echekki, Y. Pei, and S. Som, An equivalent dissipation rate model for capturing history effects in non-premixed flames, Combust. Flame 176 (2017), pp. 202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Pal, S. Keum, and H.G. Im, Assessment of flamelet versus multi-zone combustion modeling approaches for stratified-charge compression ignition engines, Int. J. Engine Res. 17 (2016), pp. 280–290. doi: 10.1177/1468087415571006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Tillou, J.-B. Michel, C. Angelberger, and D. Veynante, Assessing LES models based on tabulated chemistry for the simulation of diesel spray combustion, Combust. Flame 161 (2014), pp. 525–540. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. D'Errico, T. Lucchini, F. Contino, M. Jangi, and X.-S. Bai, Comparison of well-mixed and multiple representative interactive flamelet approaches for diesel spray combustion modelling, Combust. Theory Model. 18 (2014), pp. 65–88. doi: 10.1080/13647830.2013.860238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Dhuchakallaya, P. Rattanadecho, and P. Watkins, Auto-ignition and combustion of diesel spray using unsteady laminar flamelet model, Appl. Therm. Eng. 52(2) (2013), pp. 420–427. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Egüz, S. Ayyapureddi, C. Bekdemir, B. Somers, and P. De Goey, Modeling fuel spray auto-ignition using the FGM approach: Effect of tabulation method, SAE Technical Papers, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• J. Lim, Y. Kim, S. Lee, J. Chung, W. Kang, and K. Min, 3-D simulation of the combustion process for di-methyl ether-fueled diesel engine, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 24 (2010), pp. 2597–2604. doi: 10.1007/s12206-010-0915-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Lehtiniemi, F. Mauss, M. Balthasar, and I. Magnusson, Modeling diesel spray ignition using detailed chemistry with a progress variable approach, Combust. Sci. Technol. 178 (2006), pp. 1977–1997. doi: 10.1080/00102200600793148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yu, S.-K. Kim, and Y.-M. Kim, Numerical modeling for auto-ignition and combustion processes of fuel sprays in high-pressure environment, Combust. Sci. Technol. 168 (2001), pp. 85–112. doi: 10.1080/00102200108907832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Abtahizadeh, P. de Goey, and J. van Oijen, LES of Delft jet-in-hot coflow burner to investigate the effect of preferential diffusion on autoignition of CH4/H2 flames, Fuel 191 (2017), pp. 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.U. Göktolga, J.A. Van Oijen, and L.P.H. De Goey, Modeling MILD combustion using a novel multistage FGM method, Proc. Combust. Inst. 36 (2017), pp. 4269–4277. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Abtahizadeh, P. De Goey, and J. Van Oijen, Development of a novel flamelet-based model to include preferential diffusion effects in autoignition of CH4/H2 flames, Combust. Flame 162 (2015), pp. 4358–4369. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Bekdemir, B. Somers, and P. de Goey, DNS with detailed and tabulated chemistry of engine relevant igniting systems, Combust. Flame 161 (2014), pp. 210–221. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Hu, L.M.T. Somers, T. Davies, A. McDougall, and R.F. Cracknell, A study of liquid fuel injection and combustion in a constant volume vessel at diesel engine conditions, Fuel 107 (2013), pp. 63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Bekdemir, L.M.T. Somers, and L.P.H. De Goey, Modeling diesel engine combustion using pressure dependent flamelet generated manifolds, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 2887–2894. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Domingo, L. Vervisch, and D. Veynante, Large-eddy simulation of a lifted methane jet flame in a vitiated coflow, Combust. Flame 152 (2008), pp. 415–432. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-B. Michel and O. Colin, A tabulated diffusion flame model applied to diesel engine simulations, Int. J. Engine Res. 15 (2014), pp. 346–369. doi: 10.1177/1468087413488590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, S. Ruan, and N. Swaminathan, Simulation of turbulent lifted methane jet flames: Effects of air-dilution and transient flame propagation, Combust. Flame 162 (2015), pp. 703–716. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhou, S. Li, Z. Ren, and D.H. Rowinski, Investigation of mixing model performance in transported PDF calculations of turbulent lean premixed jet flames through lagrangian statistics and sensitivity analysis, Combust. Flame 181 (2017), pp. 136–148. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Han, V. Raman, and Z. Chen, LES/PDF modeling of autoignition in a lifted turbulent flame: Analysis of flame sensitivity to differential diffusion and scalar mixing time-scale, Combust. Flame 171 (2016), pp. 69–86. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Heye, V. Raman, and A.R. Masri, Influence of spray/combustion interactions on auto-ignition of methanol spray flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 1639–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Jangi, T. Lucchini, C. Gong, and X.-S. Bai, Effects of fuel cetane number on the structure of diesel spray combustion: An accelerated Eulerian stochastic fields method, Combust. Theory Model. 19 (2015), pp. 549–567. doi: 10.1080/13647830.2015.1057234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Bhattacharjee and D.C. Haworth, Simulations of transient n-heptane and n-dodecane spray flames under engine-relevant conditions using a transported PDF method, Combust. Flame 160 (2013), pp. 2083–2102. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.M. Mir Najafizadeh, M.T. Sadeghi, R. Sotudeh-Gharebagh, and D.J.E.M. Roekaerts, Chemical structure of autoignition in a turbulent lifted H2/N2 jet flame issuing into a vitiated coflow, Combust. Flame 160 (2013), pp. 2928–2940. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.06.021
   Google Scholar
• W.P. Jones and S. Navarro-Martinez, Numerical study of n-heptane auto-ignition using LES-PDF methods, Flow Turbul. Combust. 83 (2009), pp. 407–423. doi: 10.1007/s10494-009-9228-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Gkagkas and R.P. Lindstedt, The impact of reduced chemistry on auto-ignition of H2 in turbulent flows, Combust. Theory Model. 13 (2009), pp. 607–643. doi: 10.1080/13647830902928524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.W. Lee and E. Mastorakos, Transported scalar PDF calculations of autoignition of a hydrogen jet in a heated turbulent co-flow, Combust. Theory Model. 12 (2008), pp. 1153–1178. doi: 10.1080/13647830802283095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang and S. Pope, Lagrangian investigation of local extinction, re-ignition and auto-ignition in turbulent flames, Combust. Theory Model. 12 (2008), pp. 857–882. doi: 10.1080/13647830802056137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Gkagkas and R.P. Lindstedt, Transported PDF modelling with detailed chemistry of pre- and auto-ignition in CH4/air mixtures, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(I) (2007), pp. 1559–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.078
   Google Scholar
• W.P. Jones, S. Navarro-Martinez, and O. Röhl, Large eddy simulation of hydrogen auto-ignition with a probability density function method, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(II) (2007), pp. 1765–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.041
   Google Scholar
• R.L. Gordon, A.R. Masri, S.B. Pope, and G.M. Goldin, A numerical study of auto-ignition in turbulent lifted flames issuing into a vitiated co-flow, Combust. Theory Model. 11 (2007), pp. 351–376. doi: 10.1080/13647830600903472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Sabel'nikov, M. Gorokhovski, and N. Baricault, The extended IEM mixing model in the framework of the composition PDF approach: Applications to diesel spray combustion, Combust. Theory Model. 10 (2006), pp. 155–169. doi: 10.1080/13647830500348109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.R. Cao, S.B. Pope, and A.R. Masri, Turbulent lifted flames in a vitiated coflow investigated using joint PDF calculations, Combust. Flame 142 (2005), pp. 438–453. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Masri, R. Cao, S.B. Pope, and G.M. Goldin, PDF calculations of turbulent lifted flames of H2/N2 fuel issuing into a vitiated co-flow, Combust. Theory Model. 8 (2004), pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1088/1364-7830/8/1/001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Prause, C.M. Arndt, B. Noll, and M. Aigner, Large-eddy-simulation of auto-ignition in a turbulent jet in hot coflow, Thirteenth International Workshop on Measurement & Computation of Turbulent Flames, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Arndt, J.D. Gounder, W. Meier, and M. Aigner, Auto-ignition and flame stabilization of pulsed methane jets in a hot vitiated coflow studied with high-speed laser and imaging techniques, Appl. Phys. B 108 (2012), pp. 407–417. doi: 10.1007/s00340-012-4945-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Arndt and W. Meier, Quantitative OH measurements in turbulent flames using laser-diagnostics with high spatio-temporal resolution, Proceedings of the OSA Imaging and Applied Optics Congress – Laser Applications to Chemical, Security and Environmental Analysis, number LTu2C.3, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Arndt, M.J. Papageorge, F. Fuest, J.A. Sutton, W. Meier, and M. Aigner, The role of temperature, mixture fraction, and scalar dissipation rate on transient methane injection and auto-ignition in a jet in hot coflow burner, Combust. Flame 167 (2016), pp. 60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Arndt, R. Schießl, J.D. Gounder, W. Meier, and M. Aigner, Flame stabilization and auto-ignition of pulsed methane jets in a hot coflow: Influence of temperature, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1483–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.05.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Arndt, M.J. Papageorge, F. Fuest, J.A. Sutton, and W. Meier, Experimental investigation of the auto-ignition of a transient propane jet-in-hot-coflow, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 2117–2124. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Arndt and W. Meier, Influence of boundary conditions on the flame stabilization mechanism and on transient auto-ignition in the DLR jet-in-hot-coflow burner. Flow Turbul. Combust. 102 (2019), pp. 973–993. doi: 10.1007/s10494-018-9991-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Papageorge, C. Arndt, F. Fuest, W. Meier, and J.A. Sutton, High-speed mixture fraction and temperature imaging of pulsed, turbulent fuel jets auto-igniting in high-temperature, vitiated co-flows, Exp. Fluids 55 (2014), p. 1763. doi: 10.1007/s00348-014-1763-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Arndt, R. Schießel, and W. Meier, OH planar laser-induced fluorescence measurements with high spatio-temporal resolution for the study of auto-ignition, Appl. Opt. 58 (2019), pp. C14–C22. doi: 10.1364/AO.58.000C14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Fuest, M.J. Papageorge, W.R. Lempert, and J.A Sutton, Ultrahigh laser pulse energy and power generation at 10  kHz. Opt. Lett. 37 (2012), pp. 3231–3233. doi: 10.1364/OL.37.003231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Papageorge, T.A. McManus, F. Fuest, and J.A. Sutton, Recent advances in high-speed planar rayleigh scattering in turbulent jets and flames: increased record lengths, acquisition rates, and image quality. Appl. Phys. B 115 (2014), pp. 197–213. doi: 10.1007/s00340-013-5591-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11 (1985), pp. 119–192. doi: 10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, The probability approach to the modelling of turbulent reacting flows, Combust. Flame 27 (1976), pp. 299–312. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(76)90035-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Villermaux and J.C. Devillon, Representation de la coalescence et de la redispersion des domaines de segregation dans un fluide par un modele d' interaction phenomenologique, Second International Symposium on Chemical Reaction Engineering, Elsevier, New York, 1972, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• H. Möbus, P. Gerlinger, and D. Brüggemann, Comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian monte carlo PDF methods for turbulent diffusion flames, Combust. Flame 124 (2001), pp. 519–534. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00207-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Löwe, A. Probst, T. Knopp, and R. Kessler, Low-dissipation low-dispersion second-order scheme for unstructured finite volume flow solvers, AIAA J. 54 (2016), pp. 2961–2971. doi: 10.2514/1.J054956
   Google Scholar
• G. Reichling, B. Noll, and M. Aigner, Development of a projection-based method for the numerical calculation of compressible reactive flows, Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Number AIAA 2013-1003, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Fiolitakis, P.R. Ess, P. Gerlinger, and M. Aigner, Modeling of heat transfer and differential diffusion in transported PDF methods, Combust. Flame 161 (2014), pp. 2107–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Fiolitakis, P.R. Ess, P. Gerlinger, and M. Aigner, Development and application of a transported probability density function methond on unstructured three-dimensional grids for the prediction of nitric oxides, J. Eng. Gas Turbine. Power 136 (2013), pp. 031506 031506–01–031506–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.O. Fox, Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• W.P. Jones and B.E. Launder, The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 15 (1972), pp. 301–314. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.E. Launder and B.I. Sharma, Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disk, Lett. Heat Mass Trans. 1 (1974), pp. 131–137. doi: 10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7
   Google Scholar
• H.K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, Pearson Prentice Hall, Harlow, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• G.P. Smith, D.M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N.W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C.T. Bowman, R.K. Hanson, S. Song, W.C. Gardiner Jr, V.V. Lissianski, and Z. Qin, Gri 3.0 Mechanism. Online; accessed September 20th, 2008. Available at http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• E.L. Petersen, M.H. Joel, D.S. Schuyler, J. de Vries, A.R. Amadio, and M.W. Crofton, Ignition of lean methane-based fuel blends at gas-turbine pressures, J. Eng. Gas Turbine. Power 129 (2007), pp. 937–944. doi: 10.1115/1.2720543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.G. Goodwin “An open-source, extensible software suite for CVD process simulation”, Proceedings-electrochemical society PV 1 (2003), pp. 155–162.
   Google Scholar
• B. Talbot, N. Mazellier, B. Renou, L. Danaila, and M.A. Boukhalfa, Time-resolved velocity and concentration measurements in variable-viscosity turbulent jet flow, Exp. Fluids 47 (2009), pp. 769–787. doi: 10.1007/s00348-009-0729-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Kollman and J. Janicka, The probability density function of a passive scalar in turbulent shear flows, Phys. Fluids 25 (1982), p. 1755. doi: 10.1063/1.863653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, A Monte Carlo method for the PDF equations of turbulent reactive flow, Combust. Sci. Technol. 25 (1981), pp. 159–174. doi: 10.1080/00102208108547500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.G. Batt, Turbulent mixing of passive and chemical reacting species in a low-speed shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 82 (1977), pp. 53–95. doi: 10.1017/S0022112077000536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.G. Mungal and P.E. Dimotakis, Mixing and combustion with low heat release in a turbulent shear layer, J. Fluid Mech. 148 (1984), pp. 349–382. doi: 10.1017/S002211208400238X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.S. Venkataramani, N.K. Tutu, and R. Chevray, Probability distributions in a round heated jet, Phys. Fluids 18 (1975), pp. 1413–1420. doi: 10.1063/1.861038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Subramaniam and S.B. Pope, A mixing model for turbulent flows based on euclidian minimum spanning trees, Combust. Flame 115 (1998), pp. 487–514. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Janicka, W. Kolbe, and W. Kollman, Closure of the transport equation for the probability density function of turbulent scalar fields, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 4 (1979), pp. 47–66. doi: 10.1515/jnet.1979.4.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Dopazo and E.E. O'Brien, An approach to the autoignition of a turbulent mixture, Acta. Astronaut. 1 (1974), pp. 1239–1266. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(74)90050-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Dopazo and E.E. O'Brien, Statistical treatment of non-isothermal chemical reactions in turbulence, Combust. Sci. Technol. 13 (1976), pp. 99–122. doi: 10.1080/00102207608946731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• J. Warnatz, U. Maas, and R.W. Dibble, Combustion: Physical and Chemical Fundamentals, Modeling and Simulation, Experiments, Pollutant Formation, Springer, Berlin, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2, Interscience Publishers, a division of John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• R.W. MacCormack, The effect of viscosity in hypervelocity impact cratering, Number AIAA 69-354, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme, V: A second-order sequel to Godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys. 32 (1979), pp. 101–136. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.K. Westbrook and F.L. Dryer, Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames, Combust. Sci. Technol. 27 (1981), pp. 31–43. doi: 10.1080/00102208108946970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.J. Isaac, A. Parente, C. Galletti, J.N. Thornock, P.J. Smith, and L. Tognotti, A novel methodology for chemical time scale evaluation with detailed chemical reaction kinetics, Energy Fuels 27 (2013), pp. 2255–2265. doi: 10.1021/ef301961x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar