CFD simulations of hydrogen deflagration in slow and fast combustion regime

References

• A.L. Camp, J.C. Cummings, M.P. Sherman, C.F. Kupiec, R.J. Healy, J.S. Caplan, J.R. Sandhop, and J.H. Saunders, Light Water Reactor Hydrogen Manual, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA/CSNI, OECD / SETH-2 Project PANDA and MISTRA Experiments Final Summary Report - Investigation of Key Issues for the Simulation of Thermal- hydraulic Conditions in Water Reactor Containment, OECD, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA/CSNI, Aerosol and Iodine Issues, and Hydrogen Mitigation under Accidental Conditions in Watercooled Reactors: Thermal-hydraulics, Hydrogen, Aerosols and Iodine (THAI-2) Project - Final Report, OECD, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA/CSNI, Hydrogen and Fission Product Issues Relevant for Containment Safety Assessment under Severe Accident Conditions, OECD, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA/CSNI, Status Report on Hydrogen Management and Related Computer Codes, OECD, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• J.P. van Dorsselaere, SARNET 2 final report 2014. https://www.irsn.fr/EN/Research/publications-documentation/Publications/PSN-RES/Pages/2014-SARNET-2-final-report.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• D. Paladino, S. Guentay, M. Andreani, I. Tkatschenko, J. Brinster, F. Dabbene, S. Kelm, H.J. Allelein, D.C. Visser, S. Benz, T. Jordan, Z. Liang, E. Porcheron, J. Malet, A. Bentaib, A. Kiselev, T. Yudina, A. Filippov, A. Khizbullin, M. Kamnev, A. Zaytsev and A. Loukianov, The euratom-rosatom ercosam-samara projects on containment thermal-hydraulics of current and future LWRs for severe accident management. Int. Congr. Adv. Nucl. Power Plants 2012, ICAPP 2012 2 (2012), pp. 1359–1368.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bentaib, N. Meynet, A. Bleyer and R. Grosseuvres, MITHYGENE hydrogen deflagration Benchmark main outcomes and conclusions. Nuthos 11 (2016), pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bentaib, A. Bleyer, N. Chaumeix, B. Schramm, P. Kostka, M. Movahed, H.S. Kang and M. Povilaitis, Final results of the SARNET Hydrogen deflagration Benchmark Effect of turbulence on flame acceleration, 5th European Review Meeting on Severe Accident Research (ERMSAR–2012) Cologne (Germany), March 21–23, (2012), pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bentaib, A. Bleyer, N. Meynet, N. Chaumeix, B. Schramm, M. Höhne, P. Kostka, M. Movahed, S. Worapittayaporn, T. Brähler, H. Seok-Kang, M. Povilaitis, I. Kljenak and P. Sathiah, SARNET hydrogen deflagration benchmarks: main outcomes and conclusions. Ann Nucl Energy 74 (2014), pp. 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Cherbański and E. Molga, CFD modelling of hydrogen deflagration in the ENACCEF facility. Inżynieria i Apar. Chem 56 (2017), pp. 62–63.
   Google Scholar
• H.-J. Allelein, S. Arndt, W. Klein-Heßling, S. Schwarz, C. Spengler and G. Weber, COCOSYS: Status of development and validation of the German containment code system. Nucl. Eng. Des 238 (2008), pp. 872–889. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. van Dorsselaere, C. Seropian, P. Chatelard, F. Jacq, J. Fleurot, P. Giordano, N. Reinke, B. Schwinges, H.J. Allelein and W. Luther, The ASTEC Integral code for severe Accident simulation. Nucl. Technol 165 (2009), pp. 293–307. doi: 10.13182/NT09-A4102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Summers, R.K.J. Cole, E.A. Boucheron, M.K. Carmel, S.E. Dingman and J.E. Kelly, (Sandia N.L. Kelly Albuquerque, NM (USA)), MELCOR 1. 8. 0: A Computer Code for Nuclear Reactor Severe Accident Source Term and Risk Assessment Analyses, United States, 1991. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6188851.
   Google Scholar
• M.M. Stempniewicz, SPECTRA Computer Code Manual – Version 3.61, July 2018, M.M. Stempniewicz, Arnhem, July 4, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• P. Sathiah, S. Van Haren, E. Komen and D. Roekaerts, The role of CFD combustion modeling in hydrogen safety management - II: Validation based on homogeneous hydrogen-air experiments. Nucl. Eng. Des 252 (2012), pp. 289–302. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Xiao, J.R. Travis and M. Kuznetsov, Numerical investigations of heat losses to confinement structures from hydrogen-air turbulent flames in ENACCEF facility. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40 (2015), pp. 13106–13120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Halouane and A. Dehbi, CFD simulations of premixed hydrogen combustion using the Eddy Dissipation and the turbulent flame Closure models. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42 (2017), pp. 21990–22004. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.F. Magnussen and B.H. Hjertager, On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. Symp. Combust 16 (1977), pp. 719–729. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80366-4.
   Google Scholar
• V.L. Zimont, Theory of turbulent combustion of a homogeneous fuel mixture at high reynolds numbers. Combust Explos Shock Waves 15 (1979), pp. 305–311. doi: 10.1007/BF00785062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Morley, GASEQ Windows-based Computer Program for Equilibrium Calculations, 2005. http://www.gaseq.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS Inc., ANSYS Fluent, Release 19.1, Help System, Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• D.D.S. Liu and R. MacFarlane, Laminar burning velocities of hydrogen-air and hydrogen-air-steam flames. Combust Flame 49 (1983), pp. 59–71. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(83)90151-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Leckner, Spectral and total emissivity of water vapor and Carbon Dioxide. Combust Flame 19 (1972), pp. 33–48. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(72)80084-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Viskanta, Radiation heat transfer in combustion systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci 13 (1987), pp. 97–160. doi: 10.1016/0360-1285(87)90008-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Matalon and P. Metzener, The propagation of premixed flames in closed tubes. J. Fluid Mech 336 (1997), pp. 331–350. doi: 10.1017/S0022112096004843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Xiao, W. An, Q. Duan and J. Sun, Dynamics of premixed hydrogen/air flame in a closed combustion vessel. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38 (2013), pp. 12856–12864. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Guénoche, Chapter E - Flame Propagation in Tubes and in Closed Vessels, in AGARDograph, 75, Markstein George H., ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1964. pp. 107–181. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4831-9659-6.50008-1.
   Google Scholar
• B.E. Launder and D.B. Spalding, The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng 3 (1974), pp. 269–289. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2.
   Google Scholar
• V. Zimont, W. Polifke, M. Bettelini and W. Weisenstein, An efficient computational model for premixed turbulent combustion at high reynolds numbers based on a turbulent flame speed closure. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 120 (1998), pp. 526–532. doi: 10.1115/1.2818178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Lipatnikov and J. Chomiak, Turbulent burning velocity and speed of developing, curved, and strained flames. 30th Int. Symp. Combust 29 (2002), pp. 2113–2121. doi: 10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80257-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck Verbecke, Formation and Combustion of Non-Uniform Hydrogen-Air Mixtures, University of Ulster, Ulster, 2009.
   Google Scholar