PeleLM-FDF large eddy simulator of turbulent reacting flows

References

• Colucci P.J., Jaberi F.A., Givi P., and Pope S.B., Filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows, Phys. Fluids 10 (1998), pp. 499–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaberi F.A., Colucci P.J., James S., Givi P., and Pope S.B., Filtered mass density function for large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows, J. Fluid Mech. 401 (1999), pp. 85–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari N., Goldin G.M., Sheikhi M.R.H., and Givi P., Filtered density function simulator on unstructured meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011), pp. 7132–7150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari N., Pisciuneri P.H., Strakey P.A., and Givi P., Scalar-filtered mass-density-function simulation of swirling reacting flows on unstructured grids, AIAA J. 50 (2012), pp. 2476–2482.
   Google Scholar
• Ansari N., Strakey P.A., Goldin G.M., and Givi P., Filtered density function simulation of a realistic swirled combustor, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 1433–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro L.P., Pinheiro A.P., Vilela V., Magalhães G.M., Serfaty R., and Vedovotto J.M., Implementation of a hybrid Lagrangian filtered density function–large eddy simulation methodology in a dynamic adaptive mesh refinement environment, Phys. Fluids 33 (2021), p. 045126.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary M.J., Klimenko A.Y., Janicka J., and Pfitzner M., A sparse-Lagrangian multiple mapping conditioning model for turbulent diffusion flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 1499–1507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasceno M.M.R., de Freitas Santos J.G., and Vedovoto J.M., Simulation of turbulent reactive flows using a FDF methodology – advances in particle density control for normalized variables, Comput. Fluids 170 (2018), pp. 128–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida Y.P. and Navarro-Martinez S., Large eddy simulation of a supersonic lifted flame using the Eulerian stochastic fields method, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2019), pp. 3693–3701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkarbekov M., Aitzhan A., Kaltayev A., and Sammak S., A GPU-accelerated filtered density function simulator of turbulent reacting flows, Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 34 (2020), pp. 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komperda J., Ghiasi Z., Li D., Peyvan A., Jaberi F., and Mashayek F., A hybrid discontinuous spectral element method and filtered mass density function solver for turbulent reacting flows, Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B 78 (2020), pp. 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía J.M., Chejne F., Molina A., and Sadiki A., Scalar mixing study at high-schmidt regime in a turbulent jet flow using large-eddy simulation/filtered density function approach, J. Fluids Eng. 138 (2016), p. 021205.
   Google Scholar
• Minier J., Chibbaro S., and Pope S.B., Guidelines for the formulation of Lagrangian stochastic models for particle simulations of single-phase and dispersed two-phase turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 26 (2014), p. 113303.
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan H., Popov P., and Jacobs G., A high-order semi-Lagrangian method for the consistent Monte-Carlo solution of stochastic Lagrangian drift–diffusion models coupled with Eulerian discontinuous spectral element method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 384 (2021), p. 114001.
   Google Scholar
• Nik M.B., Yilmaz S.L., Givi P., Sheikhi M.R.H., and Pope S.B., Simulation of Sandia Flame D using velocity-scalar filtered density function, AIAA J. 48 (2010), pp. 1513–1522.
   Google Scholar
• Nik M.B., Yilmaz S.L., Sheikhi M.R.H., and Givi P., Grid resolution effects on VSFMDF/LES, Flow Turbul. Combust. 85 (2010), pp. 677–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri A.G., Givi P., and Livescu D., Modeling and simulation of turbulent nuclear flames in type IA supernovae, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 108 (2019), pp. 156–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri A.G., Nik M.B., Givi P., Livescu D., and Pope S.B., Self-contained filtered density function, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2 (2017), p. 094603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri A.G., Sammak S., Pisciuneri P.H., and Givi P., Langevin simulation of turbulent combustion, in Combustion for Power Generation and Transportation, A.K. Agarwal, S. De, A. Pandey, and A.P. Singh, eds., Chap. 3, Springer, Singapore, 2017, pp. 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pisciuneri P.H., Yilmaz S.L., Strakey P.A., and Givi P., An irregularly portioned FDF simulator, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35 (2013), pp. C438–C452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammak S., Aitzhan A., Givi P., and Madnia C.K., High fidelity spectral-FDF-LES of turbulent scalar mixing, Combust. Sci. Technol. 192 (2020), pp. 1219–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammak S., Brazell M.J., Givi P., and Mavriplis D.J., A hybrid DG-Monte Carlo FDF simulator, Comput. Fluids 140 (2016), pp. 158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammak S., Nouri A.G., Brazell M.J., Mavriplis D.J., and Givi P., Discontinuous Galerkin-Monte Carlo solver for large Eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows, in 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA, Grapevine, TA, 2017, p. 0982.
   Google Scholar
• Sewerin F. and Rigopoulos S., An LES-PBE-PDF approach for predicting the soot particle size distribution in turbulent flames, Combust. Flame 189 (2018), pp. 62–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkeri H., Pope S.B., and Muradoglu M., A LES/PDF simulator on block-structured meshes, Combust. Theory Model. 23 (2019), pp. 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkeri H., Zhao X., Pope S.B., and Muradoglu M., Large eddy simulation/probability density function simulations of the Cambridge turbulent stratified flame series, Combust. Flame 199 (2019), pp. 24–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz S.L., Nik M.B., Sheikhi M.R.H., Strakey P.A., and Givi P., An irregularly portioned Lagrangian Monte Carlo method for turbulent flow simulation, J. Sci. Comput. 47 (2011), pp. 109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L., Liang J., Sun M., Wang H., and Yang Y., An energy-consistency-preserving large eddy simulation-scalar filtered mass density function (LES-SFMDF) method for high-speed flows, Combust. Theor. Model. 22 (2018), pp. 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H., Yang T., and Ren Z., Differential diffusion modeling in LES/FDF simulations of turbulent flames, AIAA J. 57 (2019), pp. 3206–3212.
   Google Scholar
• Chibbaro S., Marchioli C., Salvetti M.V., and Soldati A., Particle tracking in LES flow fields: Conditional Lagrangian statistics of filtering error, J. Turbul. 15 (2014), pp. 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Y., Cleary M.J., and Klimenko A.Y., A comparative study of Sandia Flame series (D-F) using sparse-Lagrangian MMC modelling, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1325–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimenko A.Y. and Cleary M.J., Convergence to a model in sparse-Lagrangian FDF simulations, Flow Turbul. Combust. 85 (2010), pp. 567–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirunagari R.R. and Pope S.B., LES/PDF for premixed combustion in the DNS limit, Combust. Theor. Model. 20 (2016), pp. 834–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X., Kolla H., Zhang P., Wu B., Calello S., and Najm H.N., A transported probability density function method to propagate chemistry uncertainty in reacting flow CFD, in 57th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 7–11, AIAA, San Diego, CA, 2019, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou H., Li S., Ren Z., and Rowinski D.H., Investigation of mixing model performance in transported PDF calculations of turbulent lean premixed jet flames through Lagrangian statistics and sensitivity analysis, Combust. Flame 181 (2017), pp. 136–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammak S., Ren Z., and Givi P., Modern developments in filtered density function, in Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Mixing and Reaction: For Power, Energy and Flight, D. Livescu, A.G. Nouri, F. Battaglia, and P. Givi, eds., Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020, pp. 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Yang T., Yin Y., Zhou H., and Ren Z., Review of Lagrangian stochastic models for turbulent combustion, Acta Mech. Sin. 37 (2021), p. 1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka A., Day M.S., and Bell J.B., A conservative, thermodynamically consistent numerical approach for low mach number combustion. Part I: Single-level integration, Combust. Theor. Model. 22 (2018), pp. 156–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari N., Jaberi F.A., Sheikhi M.R.H., and Givi P., Filtered density function as a modern CFD tool, in Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics: Volume 1, A.R.S. Maher, ed., Chap. 1, International Energy and Environment Foundation, Najaf, 2011, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bell J., AMR for low Mach number reacting flow, in Adaptive Mesh Refinement – Theory and Applications, T. Plewa, T. Linde, and V. Gregory Weirs, eds., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, pp. 203–221.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W., Almgren A., Beckner V., Bell J., Blaschke J., Chan C., Day M., Friesen B., Gott K., Graves D., Katz M., Myers A., Nguyen T., Nonaka A., Rosso M., Williams S., and Zingale M., AMReX: A framework for block-structured adaptive mesh refinement, J. Open Source Softw. 4 (2019), p. 1370.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W., Almgren A., Day M., Nguyen T., Shalf J., and Unat D., BoxLib with tiling: An adaptive mesh refinement software framework, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 38 (2016), pp. S156–S172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almgren A.S., Bell J.B., Colella P., Howell L.H., and Welcome M.L., A conservative adaptive projection method for the variable density incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys. 142 (1998), pp. 1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell J.B., Day M.S., Almgren A.S., Lijewski M.J., and Rendleman C.A., A parallel adaptive projection method for low mach number flows, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl 40 (2002), pp. 209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pember R.B., Howell L.H., Bell J.B., Colella P., Crutchfield W.Y., Fiveland W.A., and Jessee J.P., An adaptive projection method for unsteady, low-mach number combustion, Combust. Sci. Technol.140 (1998), pp. 123–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esclapez L., Ricchiuti V., Bell J.B., and Day M.S., A spectral deferred correction strategy for low Mach number reacting flows subject to electric fields, Combust. Theor. Model. 24 (2020), pp. 194–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamon F.P., Day M.S., and Minion M.L., Concurrent implicit spectral deferred correction scheme for low-Mach number combustion with detailed chemistry, Combust. Theor. Model. 23 (2019), pp. 279–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka A., Bell J.B., Day M.S., Gilet C., Almgren A.S., and Minion M.L., A deferred correction coupling strategy for low mach number flow with complex chemistry, Combust. Theor. Model. 16 (2012), pp. 1053–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazner W.E., Nonaka A., Bell J.B., Day M.S., and Minion M.L., A high-order spectral deferred correction strategy for low mach number flow with complex chemistry, Combust. Theor. Model. 20 (2016), pp. 521–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojlovic Z., Najmabadi F., and Day M., An embedded boundary method for viscous, conducting compressible flow, J. Comput. Phys. 216 (2006), pp. 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pember R., Almgren A., Crutchfield W., Howell L., Bell J., Colella P., and Beckner V., An embedded boundary method for the modeling of unsteady combustion in an industrial gas-fired furnace, in Fall Meeting of the Western States Section of the Combustion Institute, Combustion Institute, Stanford, CA, 1995, p. 10. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/195764.
   Google Scholar
• Aspden A., Day M., and Bell J., Three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of turbulent lean premixed methane combustion with detailed kinetics, Combust. Flame 166 (2016), pp. 266–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspden A.J., Day M.S., and Bell J.B., Towards the distributed burning regime in turbulent premixed flames, J. Fluid Mech. 871 (2019), pp. 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta D., Sun W., Day M., Aspden A.J., and Lieuwen T., Analysis of chemical pathways and flame structure for n-dodecane/air turbulent premixed flames, Combust. Flame 207 (2019), pp. 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta D., Sun W., Day M., and Lieuwen T., Effect of turbulence-chemistry interactions on chemical pathways for turbulent hydrogen-air premixed flames, Combust. Flame 176 (2017), pp. 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimer N.T., Day M.S., Lapointe C., Meehan M.A., Makowiecki A.S., Glusman J.F., Daily J.W., Rieker G.B., and Hamlington P.E., Numerical simulations of buoyancy-driven flows using adaptive mesh refinement: Structure and dynamics of a large-scale helium plume, Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 35 (2021), pp. 61–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madnia C.K., Jaberi F.A., and Givi P., Large eddy simulation of heat and mass transport in turbulent flows, in Handbook of Numerical Heat Transfer, W.J. Minkowycz, E.M. Sparrow, and J.Y. Murthy, eds., 2nd ed., Chap. 5, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2006, pp. 167–190.
   Google Scholar
• Williams F.A., Turbulent combustion, in The Mathematics of Combustion, J.D. Buckmaster, ed., Chap. 3, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1985, pp. 97–131.
   Google Scholar
• Garnier E., Adams N., and Sagaut P., Large Eddy Simulation for Compressible Flows, Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky J., General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment, Mon. Weather Rev. 91 (1963), pp. 99–164.
   Google Scholar
• Vreman A.W., An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: Algebraic theory and applications, Phys. Fluids 16 (2004), pp. 3670–3681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien E.E., The probability density function (PDF) approach to reacting turbulent flows, in Turbulent Reacting Flows, P. Libby and F. Williams, eds., Topics in Applied Physics Vol. 44, Chap. 5, Springer, Heidelberg, 1980, pp. 185–218.
   Google Scholar
• Williams S., Lijewski M., Almgren A., Straalen B.V., Carson E., Knight N., and Demmel J., s-Step Krylov subspace methods as bottom solvers for geometric multigrid, in 2014 IEEE 28th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, IEEE, Phoenix, AZ, 2014, pp. 1149–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Musser J., Almgren A.S., Fullmer W.D., Antepara O., Bell J.B., Blaschke J., Gott K., Myers A., Porcu R., Rangarajan D., Rosso M., Zhang W., and Syamlal M., MFIX-Exa: A path toward exascale CFD-DEM simulations, Int. J. High Perform. C. 36 (2021), pp. 40–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day M.S. and Bell J.B., Numerical simulation of laminar reacting flows with complex chemistry, Combust. Theor. Model. 4 (2000), pp. 535–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloeden P.E., Platen E., and Schurz H., Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations Through Computer Experiments, 1st ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. and Haworth D., A general mass consistency algorithm for hybrid particle/finite-volume PDF methods, J. Comput. Phys. 194 (2004), pp. 156–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkeri H., A general purpose large-eddy simulation/probability density function simulator on block structured grids, Ph.D. diss., Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes E.R., Sankaran R., Sutherland J.C., and Chen J.H., Scalar mixing in direct numerical simulations of temporally evolving plane jet flames with skeletal CO/H2 kinetics, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007), pp. 1633–1640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punati N., Sutherland J.C., Kerstein A.R., Hawkes E.R., and Chen J.H., An evaluation of the one-dimensional turbulence model: Comparison with direct numerical simulations of CO/H2 jets with extinction and reignition, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 1515–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen B.A., Hawkes E.R., and Menon S., Large eddy simulation of extinction and reignition with artificial neural networks based chemical kinetics, Combust. Flame 157 (2010), pp. 566–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo S., Kronenburg A., Stein O.T., and Cleary M.J., MMC-LES of a syngas mixing layer using an anisotropic mixing time scale model, Combust. Flame 189 (2018), pp. 311–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo S., Stein O.T., Kronenburg A., and Cleary M.J., Assessment of mixing time scales for a sparse particle method, Combust. Flame 179 (2017), pp. 280–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S., Ranjan R., Yang V., Sun W., and Menon S., Sensitivity of predictions to chemical kinetics models in a temporally evolving turbulent non-premixed flame, Combust. Flame 183 (2017), pp. 224–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y., Wang H., Pope S.B., and Chen J.H., Large-eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a non-premixed CO/H2 temporally evolving jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1241–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germano M., A statistical formulation of dynamic model, Phys. Fluids 8 (1996), pp. 565–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaghefi N.S., Nik M.B., Pisciuneri P.H., and Madnia C.K., A Priori assessment of the subgrid scale viscous/scalar dissipation closures in compressible turbulence, J. Turbul. 14 (2013), pp. 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger R.W., The structure of diffusion flames, Combust. Sci. Technol. 13 (1976), pp. 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters N., Turbulent combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikhi M.R.H., Givi P., and Pope S.B., Velocity-scalar filtered mass density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows, Phys. Fluids 19 (2007), p. 095106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givi P., Jou W.H., and Metcalfe R., Flame extinction in a temporally developing mixing layer, Symp. (Int.) Combust. 21 (1986), pp. 1251–1261.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes E., Sankaran R., and Chen J., Reignition dynamics in massively parallel direct numerical simulations of CO/H2 jet flames, in 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference. School of Engineering, The University of Queensland, Gold Coast, 2007. https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/imarusic/proceedings/16/Hawkes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne W.R., Weddell D.S., and Hottel H.C., Mixing and combustion in turbulent gas jets, Third Symp. Combustion Flame, Explosion Phenomena 3 (1948), pp. 266–288.
   Google Scholar
• Givi P., Model-free simulations of turbulent reactive flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 15 (1989), pp. 1–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givi P., Filtered density function for subgrid scale modeling of turbulent combustion, AIAA J. 44 (2006), pp. 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Haworth D.C., Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36 (2010), pp. 168–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller R.S. and Foster J.W., Survey of turbulent combustion models for large eddy simulations of propulsive flowfields, AIAA J. 54 (2016), pp. 2930–2946.
   Google Scholar
• Pope S.B., Small scales, many species and the manifold challenges of turbulent combustion, Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (2013), pp. 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gicquel L.Y.M., Givi P., Jaberi F.A., and Pope S.B., Velocity filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 14 (2002), pp. 1196–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikhi M.R.H., Drozda T.G., Givi P., and Pope S.B., Velocity-scalar filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 15 (2003), pp. 2321–2337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikhi M.R.H., Givi P., and Pope S.B., Frequency-velocity-scalar filtered mass density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 21 (2009), p. 075102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimenko A.Y., Lagrangian particles with mixing. II. Sparse-Lagrangian methods in application for turbulent reacting flows, Phys. Fluids 21 (2009), p. 065102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H., Popov P.P., and Pope S.B., Weak second-order splitting schemes for Lagrangian Monte Carlo particle methods for the composition PDF/FDF transport equations, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010), pp. 1852–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov P.P. and Pope S.B., Implicit and explicit schemes for mass consistency preservation in hybrid particle/finite-volume algorithms for turbulent reactive flows, J. Comput. Phys. 257 (2014), pp. 352–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitaraman H., Yellapantula S., Henry de Frahan M.T., Perry B., Rood J., Grout R., and Day M., Adaptive mesh based combustion simulations of direct fuel injection effects in a supersonic cavity flame-holder, Combust. Flame 232 (2021), p. 111531.
   Google Scholar
• Drozda T.G., Sheikhi M.R.H., Madnia C.K., and Givi P., Developments in formulation and application of the filtered density function, Flow Turbul. Combust. 78 (2007), pp. 35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar