Conditional space evaluation of progress variable definitions for Cambridge/Sandia swirl flames

References

• J. van Oijen, A. Donini, R. Bastiaans, J. ten Thije Boonkkamp, and L. de Goey, State-of-the-art in premixed combustion modeling using flamelet generated manifolds, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 57 (2016), pp. 30–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Klimenko and R. Bilger, Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 25 (1999), pp. 595–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Veynante and L. Vervisch, Turbulent combustion modeling, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 28 (2002), pp. 193–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Poinsot and D. Veynante, Theoretical and numerical combustion, 2nd ed., RT Edwards, Philadelphia PA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• D. Dovizio, J.W. Labahn, and C.B. Devaud, Doubly conditional source-term estimation (DCSE) applied to a series of lifted turbulent jet flames in cold air, Combust. Flame.162 (2015), pp. 1976–1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.D. Nguyen, L. Vervisch, V. Subramanian, and P. Domingo, Multidimensional flamelet-generated manifolds for partially premixed combustion, Combust. Flame. 157 (2010), pp. 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H. Mahdipour and M.M. Salehi, Localized conditional source-term estimation model for turbulent combustion, Combustion Flame. 235 (2021), p. 111715.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ihme and Y.C. See, LES flamelet modeling of a three-stream MILD combustor: analysis of flame sensitivity to scalar inflow conditions, Proc. Combustion Inst. 33 (2011), pp. 1309–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ihme, J. Zhang, G. He, and B. Dally, Large-Eddy simulation of a Jet-in-Hot-Coflow burner operating in the Oxygen-Diluted combustion regime, Flow, Turbulence Combustion 89 (2012), pp. 449–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Labahn, D. Dovizio, and C. Devaud, Numerical simulation of the Delft-Jet-in-Hot-Coflow (DJHC) flame using conditional source-term estimation, Proc. Combustion Inst. 35 (2015), pp. 3547–3555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Labahn and C. Devaud, Large Eddy simulations (LES) including conditional source-term estimation (CSE) applied to two Delft-Jet-in-Hot-Coflow (DJHC) flames, Combust. Flame.164 (2016), pp. 68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.W. Bilger and S.H. Starner, On reduced mechanisms for methane-air combustion in nonpremixed flames, Combust. Flame. 80 (1990), pp. 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Fang, R. Ismail, M.H. Davy, and J. Camm, Numerical Studies of Combustion Recession on ECN Diesel Spray A, Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference Vol. 2: Emissions Control Systems; Instrumentation, Controls, and Hybrids; Numerical Simulation; Engine Design and Mechanical Development, Proceedings of the ASME 2018 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, San Diego, USA, Vol. 11, 2018, p. v002T06A011.
   Google Scholar
• X. Fang, R. Ismail, and M. Davy, A study on kinetic mechanisms of diesel fuel surrogate n-dodecane for the simulation of combustion recession, in WCX SAE World Congress Experience, SAE International, Detroit, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Sun, S. Gierth, M. Pollack, C. Hasse, and A. Scholtissek, Ignition under strained conditions: unsteady flamelet progress variable modeling for diesel engine conditions in the transient counterflow configuration, Combust. Flame. 240 (2022), p. 111841.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ihme, L. Shunn, and J. Zhang, Regularization of reaction progress variable for application to flamelet-based combustion models, J. Comput. Phys. 231 (2012), pp. 7715–7721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.S. Niu, L. Vervisch, and P.D. Tao, An optimization-based approach to detailed chemistry tabulation: automated progress variable definition, Combust. Flame. 160 (2013), pp. 776–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vasavan, P. de Goey, and J. van Oijen, A novel method to automate FGM progress variable with application to igniting combustion systems, Combustion Theory Modell. 24 (2020), pp. 221–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Chitgarha, F. Ommi, and M. Farshchi, Assessment of optimal reaction progress variable characteristics for partially premixed flames, Combustion Theory Modell. 26 (2022), pp. 797–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Gupta, O.J. Teerling, and J.A. van Oijen, Effect of progress variable definition on the mass burning rate of premixed laminar flames predicted by the flamelet generated manifold method, Combustion Theory Modell. 25 (2021), pp. 631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Lipatnikov and V. Sabelnikov, Evaluation of mean species mass fractions in premixed turbulent flames: a DNS study, Proc. Combustion Inst. 38 (2021), pp. 6413–6420.
   Google Scholar
• A. Lipatnikov, V. Sabelnikov, F. Hernández-Pérez, W. Song, and H.G. Im, A priori DNS study of applicability of flamelet concept to predicting mean concentrations of species in turbulent premixed flames at various Karlovitz numbers, Combust. Flame. 222 (2020), pp. 370–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Giusti and E. Mastorakos, Detailed chemistry LES/CMC simulation of a swirling ethanol spray flame approaching blow-off, Proc. Combustion Inst. 36 (2017), pp. 2625–2632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Varna, A. Wehrfritz, E.R. Hawkes, M.J. Cleary, T. Lucchini, G. D'Errico, S. Kook, and Q.N. Chan, Application of a multiple mapping conditioning mixing model to ECN spray A, Proc. Combustion Inst.37 (2019), pp. 3263–3270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.K. Bushe and H. Steiner, Conditional moment closure for large eddy simulation of nonpremixed turbulent reacting flows, Phys. Fluids 11 (1999), pp. 1896–1906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.W. Labahn, I. Stanković, C.B. Devaud, and B. Merci, Comparative study between conditional moment closure (CMC) and conditional source-term estimation (CSE) applied to piloted jet flames, Combust. Flame. 181 (2017), pp. 172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Huang, M.J. Cleary, Z. Ren, and H. Zhang, Large Eddy simulation of a supersonic lifted hydrogen flame with sparse-Lagrangian multiple mapping conditioning approach, Combustion Flame. 238 (2021), p. 111756.
   Google Scholar
• X. Fang, R. Ismail, K. Bushe, and M. Davy, Simulation of ECN diesel spray A using conditional source-term estimation, Combustion Theory Modell. 24 (2020), pp. 725–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Fang, R. Ismail, N. Sekularac, and M. Davy, On the Prediction of Spray A End of Injection Phenomenon Using Conditional Source-Term Estimation, WCX SAE World Congress Experience, SAE International, Detroit, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• X. Fang, N. Sekularac, and M.H. Davy, Parametric Studies of a Novel Combustion Modelling Approach for Low Temperature Diesel Spray Simulation, Proceedings of the ASME 2020 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, 2020, p. v001T06A005.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hussien and C. Devaud, Simulations of partially premixed turbulent ethanol spray flames using doubly conditional source term estimation (DCSE), Combustion Flame. 239 (2021), p. 111651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dovizio and C. Devaud, Doubly conditional source-term estimation (DCSE) for the modelling of turbulent stratified V-shaped flame, Combust. Flame. 172 (2016), pp. 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Devaud, W.K. Bushe, and J. Bellan, The modeling of the turbulent reaction rate under high-pressure conditions: A priori evaluation of the conditional source-term estimation concept, Combust. Flame. 207 (2019), pp. 205–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Bushe, Spatial gradients of conditional averages in turbulent flames, Combust. Flame. 192 (2018), pp. 314–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mousemi and W. Kendal Bushe, The joint probability density function of mixture fraction, reaction progress variable, and total enthalpy in a stratified, swirl-stabilized turbulent flame, Phys. Fluids 33 (2021), p. 035106.
   Google Scholar
• W.K. Bushe, C. Devaud, and J. Bellan, A priori evaluation of the double-conditioned conditional source-term estimation model for high-pressure heptane turbulent combustion using DNS data obtained with one-step chemistry, Combust. Flame. 217 (2020), pp. 131–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Sutherland and A. Parente, Combustion modeling using principal component analysis, Proc. Combustion Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 1563–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.S. Sweeney, S. Hochgreb, M.J. Dunn, and R.S. Barlow, The structure of turbulent stratified and premixed methane/air flames I: non-swirling flows, Combust. Flame. 159 (2012), pp. 2896–2911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.S. Sweeney, S. Hochgreb, M.J. Dunn, and R.S. Barlow, The structure of turbulent stratified and premixed methane/air flames II: swirling flows, Combust. Flame. 159 (2012), pp. 2912–2929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mousemi, W.K. Bushe, and S. Hochgreb, Evaluation of manifold representations of chemistry in stratified, swirl-stabilized flames, Combust. Flame. 229 (2021), p. 111418.
   Google Scholar
• M. Wang, J. Huang, and W. Bushe, Simulation of a turbulent non-premixed flame using conditional source-term estimation with trajectory generated low-dimensional manifold, Proc. Combustion Inst.31 (2007), pp. 1701–1709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Owoyele, P. Kundu, M.M. Ameen, T. Echekki, and S. Som, Application of deep artificial neural networks to multi-dimensional flamelet libraries and spray flames, Int. J. Engine Res. 21 (2020), pp. 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ihme, W.T. Chung, and A.A. Mishra, Combustion machine learning: principles, progress and prospects, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 91 (2022), p. 101010.
   Google Scholar
• H. Mirgolbabaei and T. Echekki, Nonlinear reduction of combustion composition space with kernel principal component analysis, Combust. Flame. 161 (2014), pp. 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Malik, P. Obando Vega, A. Coussement, and A. Parente, Combustion modeling using principal component analysis: a posteriori validation on sandia flames D, E and F, Proc. Combustion Inst. 38 (2021), pp. 2635–2643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Parente, J. Sutherland, L. Tognotti, and P. Smith, Identification of low-dimensional manifolds in turbulent flames, Proc. Combustion Inst. 32 (2009), pp. 1579–1586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Shlens, A tutorial on principal component analysis, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• B.J. Isaac, A. Coussement, O. Gicquel, P.J. Smith, and A. Parente, Reduced-order PCA models for chemical reacting flows, Combust. Flame. 161 (2014), pp. 2785–2800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Biglari and J.C. Sutherland, An a-posteriori evaluation of principal component analysis-based models for turbulent combustion simulations, Combust. Flame. 162 (2015), pp. 4025–4035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.J. Isaac, J.N. Thornock, J. Sutherland, P.J. Smith, and A. Parente, Advanced regression methods for combustion modelling using principal components, Combust. Flame. 162 (2015), pp. 2592–2601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Malik, B.J. Isaac, A. Coussement, P.J. Smith, and A. Parente, Principal component analysis coupled with nonlinear regression for chemistry reduction, Combust. Flame.187 (2018), pp. 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Parente and J.C. Sutherland, Principal component analysis of turbulent combustion data: data pre-processing and manifold sensitivity, Combust. Flame. 160 (2013), pp. 340–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Ranade and T. Echekki, A framework for data-based turbulent combustion closure: A priori validation, Combust. Flame. 206 (2019), pp. 490–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Turkeri, X. Zhao, and M. Muradoglu, Large eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of turbulent swirling stratified flame series, Phys. Fluids 33 (2021), p. 025117.
   Google Scholar
• A.N. Lipatnikov, T. Nilsson, R. Yu, X.S. Bai, and V.A. Sabelnikov, Assessment of a flamelet approach to evaluating mean species mass fractions in moderately and highly turbulent premixed flames, Phys. Fluids 33 (2021), p. 045121.
   Google Scholar