LES of premixed jet flames subjected to extreme turbulence using flamelet-generated manifolds: a comparison of unstrained and strained flamelets

References

• J. van Oijen, A. Donini, R. Bastiaans, J. ten Thije Boonkkamp, and L. de Goey, State-of-the-art in premixed combustion modeling using flamelet generated manifolds, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 57 (2016), pp. 30–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Gicquel, N. Darabiha, and D. Thevenin, Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion, Proc. Combust. Inst. 28(2) (2000), pp. 1901–1908.
   Google Scholar
• C.D. Pierce and P. Moin, Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion, J. Fluid. Mech. 504 (2004), pp. 73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hosseinzadeh, A. Sadiki, F. di Mare, and J. Janicka, Effects of subgrid scale and combustion modelling on flame structure of a turbulent premixed flame within les and tabulated chemistry framework, Combust. Theory Model. 21(5) (2017), pp. 838–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. Driscoll, J.H. Chen, A.W. Skiba, C.D. Carter, E.R. Hawkes, and H. Wang, Premixed flames subjected to extreme turbulence: some questions and recent answers, Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 76 (2020), pp. 100802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.W. Skiba, T.M. Wabel, C.D. Carter, S.D. Hammack, J.E. Temme, and J.F. Driscoll, Premixed flames subjected to extreme levels of turbulence part I: flame structure and a new measured regime diagram, Combust. Flame. 189 (2018), pp. 407–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhou, C. Brackmann, Z. Li, M. Alden, and X.-S. Bai, Simultaneous multi-species and temperature visualization of premixed flames in the distributed reaction zone regime, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35(2) (2015), pp. 1409–1416.
   Google Scholar
• W. Zhang, J. Wang, W. Lin, G. Li, Z. Hu, M. Zhang, and Z. Huang, Effect of hydrogen enrichment on flame broadening of turbulent premixed flames in thin reaction regime, Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy.46(1) (2021), pp. 1210–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Knudsen, H. Kolla, E.R. Hawkes, and H. Pitsch, LES of a premixed jet flame DNS using a strained flamelet model, Combust. Flame. 160(12) (2013), pp. 2911–2927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Han, H. Wang, G. Kuenne, E.R. Hawkes, J.H. Chen, J. Janicka, and C. Hasse, Large eddy simulation/dynamic thickened flame modeling of a high Karlovitz number turbulent premixed jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37(2) (2019), pp. 2555–2563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.C.C. Galeazzo, B. Savard, H. Wang, E.R. Hawkes, J.H. Chen, and G.C. Krieger Filho, Performance assessment of flamelet models in flame-resolved les of a high Karlovitz methane/air stratified premixed jet flame, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37(2) (2019), pp. 2545–2553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, E.R. Hawkes, B. Savard, and J.H. Chen, Direct numerical simulation of a high Ka CH4/air stratified premixed jet flame, Combust. Flame. 193 (2018), pp. 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Van Oijen and L. De Goey, Modelling of premixed counterflow flames using the flamelet-generated manifold method, Combust. Theory Model. 6(3) (2002), pp. 463–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Donini, R. Bastiaans, J. van Oijen, and L. de Goey, A 5-d implementation of FGM for the large eddy simulation of a stratified swirled flame with heat loss in a gas turbine combustor, Flow, Turbulence Combust. 98(3) (2017), pp. 887–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zhang, S. Karaca, J. Wang, Z. Huang, and J. van Oijen, Large eddy simulation of the Cambridge/Sandia stratified flame with flamelet-generated manifolds: Effects of non-unity Lewis numbers and stretch, Combust. Flame. 227 (2021), pp. 106–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Proch and A.M. Kempf, Numerical analysis of the Cambridge stratified flame series using artificial thickened flame les with tabulated premixed flame chemistry, Combust. Flame. 161(10) (2014), pp. 2627–2646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.X. Chen, I. Langella, R.S. Barlow, and N. Swaminathan, Prediction of local extinctions in piloted jet flames with inhomogeneous inlets using unstrained flamelets, Combust. Flame. 212 (2020), pp. 415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhou, C. Brackmann, Z. Wang, Z. Li, M. Richter, M. Alden, and X.-S. Bai, Thin reaction zone and distributed reaction zone regimes in turbulent premixed methane/air flames: scalar distributions and correlations, Combust. Flame. 175 (2017), pp. 220–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Dunn, A.R. Masri, and R.W. Bilger, A new piloted premixed jet burner to study strong finite-rate chemistry effects, Combust. Flame. 151(1-2) (2007), pp. 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, E.R. Hawkes, and J.H. Chen, A direct numerical simulation study of flame structure and stabilization of an experimental high ka ch4/air premixed jet flame, Combust. Flame. 180 (2017), pp. 110–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Wang, E.R. Hawkes, B. Zhou, J.H. Chen, Z. Li, and M. Alden, A comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment of the turbulent burning velocity-related statistics in a turbulent methane-air premixed jet flame at high Karlovitz number, Proc. Combust. Inst. 36(2) (2017), pp. 2045–2053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ketelheun, C. Olbricht, F. Hahn, and J. Janicka, No prediction in turbulent flames using LES/FGM with additional transport equations, Proc. Combust. Inst. 33(2) (2011), pp. 2975–2982.
   Google Scholar
• D.V. Efimov, P. de Goey, and J. van Oijen, QFM: quenching flamelet-generated manifold for modelling of flame-wall interactions, Combust. Theory Model. 24(1) (2020), pp. 72–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.V. Efimov, P. de Goey, and J. van Oijen, FGM with REDx: chemically reactive dimensionality extension, Combust. Theory Model. 22(6) (2018), pp. 1103–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhou, C. Brackmann, Q. Li, Z. Wang, P. Petersson, Z. Li, M. Alden, and X.-S. Bai, Distributed reactions in highly turbulent premixed methane/air flames: part I. flame structure characterization, Combust. Flame. 162(7) (2015), pp. 2937–2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Carbone, J.L. Smolke, A.M. Fincham, and F.N. Egolfopoulos, Comparative behavior of piloted turbulent premixed jet flames of c1c8 hydrocarbons, Combust. Flame. 180 (2017), pp. 88–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Barlow, J. Frank, A. Karpetis, and J.-Y. Chen, Piloted methane/air jet flames: transport effects and aspects of scalar structure, Combust. Flame. 143(4) (2005), pp. 433–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Fuest, G. Magnotti, R. Barlow, and J. Sutton, Scalar structure of turbulent partially-premixed dimethyl ether/air jet flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35(2) (2015), pp. 1235–1242.
   Google Scholar
• S. Meares and A.R. Masri, A modified piloted burner for stabilizing turbulent flames of inhomogeneous mixtures, Combust. Flame. 161(2) (2014), pp. 484–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Klein, A. Sadiki, and J. Janicka, A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 186(2) (2003), pp. 652–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Immer, Time-resolved measurement and simulation of local scale turbulent urban flow, ETH Zurich, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M.P. Martín, U. Piomelli, and G.V. Candler, Subgrid-Scale models for compressible large-Eddy simulations, Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 13(5) (2000), pp. 361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby, A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques, Comput. Phys. 12(6) (1998), pp. 620–631.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bilger, The structure of turbulent nonpremixed flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 22(1) (1989), pp. 475–488.
   Google Scholar
• H. Gupta, O.J. Teerling, and J. van Oijen, Effect of progress variable definition on the mass burning rate of premixed laminar flames predicted by the flamelet generated manifold method, Combust. Theory Model. 25(4) (2021), pp. 631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.P. Smith, D.M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N.W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C.T. Bowman, R.K. Hanson, S. Song, W.C. Gardiner Jr, and V. Lissianski, Gri 3.0 mechanism, Gas Research Institute (1999). Available at http://www.me.berkeley.edu/grimech.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ketelheun, G. Kuenne, and J. Janicka, Heat transfer modeling in the context of large eddy simulation of premixed combustion with tabulated chemistry, Flow, Turbulence Combust. 91(4) (2013), pp. 867–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Donini, R.J.M. Bastiaans, J. van Oijen, and L.P.H. de Goey, Differential diffusion effects inclusion with flamelet generated manifold for the modeling of stratified premixed cooled flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35(1) (2015), pp. 831–837.
   Google Scholar
• J. Floyd, A.M. Kempf, A. Kronenburg, and R. Ram, A simple model for the filtered density function for passive scalar combustion les, Combust. Theory Model. 13(4) (2009), pp. 559–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.D. Pierce and P. Moin, A dynamic model for subgrid-scale variance and dissipation rate of a conserved scalar, Phys. Fluids 10(12) (1998), pp. 3041–3044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Ranganath and T. Echekki, Effects of preferential and differential diffusion on the mutual annihilation of two premixed hydrogen–air flames, Combust. Theory Model. 9(4) (2005), pp. 659–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Venkateswaran, A. Marshall, D. Shin, D. Noble, J. Seitzman, and T. Lieuwen, Measurements and analysis of turbulent consumption speeds of H2/CO mixtures, Combust. Flame. 158(8) (2011), pp. 1602–1614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zhang, J. Wang, W. Lin, R. Mao, H. Xia, M. Zhang, and Z. Huang, Effect of differential diffusion on turbulent lean premixed hydrogen enriched flames through structure analysis, Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 45(18) (2020), pp. 10920–10931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Masri, Partial premixing and stratification in turbulent flames, Proc. Combust. Inst. 35(2) (2015), pp. 1115–1136.
   Google Scholar
• D. Butz, S. Hartl, S. Popp, S. Walther, R.S. Barlow, C. Hasse, A. Dreizler, and D. Geyer, Local flame structure analysis in turbulent CH4/air flames with multi-regime characteristics, Combust. Flame. 210 (2019), pp. 426–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar