Market integration between wild and farmed species in Spain

References

• Alfranca, O., J. Oca, & L. Reig (2004) Product differentiation and dynamic price behavior in fish markets. International Advances in Economic Research, 10(2), 150–158.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.L. (1985) Market interactions between aquaculture and the common-property commercial fishery. Marine Resource Economics, 2(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ardeni, P.G. (1989) Does the Law of One Price really hold for commodity prices? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 661–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F. (2008) Farming the sea. Marine Resource Economics, 23(4), 527–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., L.S. Bennear, A. Oglend, & M.D. Smith (2012) US shrimp market integration. Marine Resource Economics, 27(2), 181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., T. Bjørndal, & J.A. Young (2001) Market interactions for aquaculture products. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 5(5–6), 303–318.
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., D.V. Gordon, & R. Hannesson (2004) Tests for market integration and the law of one price: the market for whitefish in France. Marine Resource Economics, 19(2), 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., A.G. Guttormsen, T. Sebulonsen, & E.H. Sissener (2005) Competition between farmed and wild salmon: the Japanese salmon market. Agricultural Economics, 33(3), 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béné, C., M. Cadren, & F. Lantz (2000) Impact of cultured shrimp industry on wild shrimp fisheries: Analysis of price determination mechanisms and market dynamics. Agricultural Economics, 23(1), 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørndal, T. & J. Guillen (2016a) Market competition between farmed and wild fish. Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1114. FAO, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørndal, T. & J. Guillen (2016b) Market competition between selected wild and farmed species in Mediterranean fish markets. Working Paper Series, No 1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Møre og Romsdal, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørndal, T., J. Guillen, & A. Imsland (2016c) The potential of aquaculture sole production in Europe: Production costs and markets. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 20(1), 109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigante, R. & A. Lem (2001, April) Price interaction between aquaculture and fishery. An econometric analysis of seabream and seabass in Italian markets. IXth EAFE Conference Proceedings, Salermo, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Claret, A., L. Guerrero, E. Aguirre, L. Rincón, M.D. Hernández, I. Martínez, J.B. Peleteiro, A. Grau, & C. Rodríguez-Rodríguez (2012) Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis: exploratory study of the importance of country of origin, obtaining method, storage conditions and purchasing price. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2), 259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cournot, A.A. (1838) Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Translated as: Cournot, A.A. (1971) Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the theory of wealth. Augustus M. Kelly Publishers, New York, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, J. (2007) Cointegration analysis and the choice of lag length. Applied Economics Letters, 14(12), 881–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.F. & C.W.J. Granger (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2014) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2014. FAO, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2015) Capture production 1950–2013, Aquaculture production (quantities and values) 1950–2013, and Fisheries commodities production and trade 1976–2011. In FishStatJ - software for fishery statistical time series.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Polanco, J. & L. Luna (2010) Analysis of perceptions of quality of wild and cultured seabream in Spain. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 14(1), 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Polanco, J. & L. Luna (2012) Factors affecting consumers’ beliefs about aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management 16(1), 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Polanco, J., S. Mueller Loose, & L. Luna (2013) Are retailers’ preferences for seafood attributes predictive for consumer wants? Results from a choice experiment for seabream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture Economics & Management 17(2), 103–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B.K. & T.C. Schroeder (1991) Cointegration and spatial price linkages in regional cattle markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(2), 452–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D.V., K.G. Salvanes, & F. Atkins (1993) A fish is a fish is a fish? Testing for market linkages on the Paris fish market. Marine Resource Economics, 8(4), 331–343.
   Google Scholar
• Guillen, J. & R. Franquesa (2015) Price transmission and volatility along the Spanish fresh fish market chain. New Medit, 14(1), 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillen, J. & F. Maynou (2015) Characterization of fish species based on ex-vessel prices and its management implications: an application to the Spanish Mediterranean. Fisheries Research, 167, 22–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (1995) Using Time Series Analysis in Econometric Modelling. Prentice Hall, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffry, S., S. Pascoe, G. Taylor, & U. Zabala (2000) Price interactions between salmon and wild caught fish species on the Spanish market. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 4(3–4), 157–167.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. & K. Juselius (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration - with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kole, A. (2003) Consumer Opinions Towards Farmed Fish, Accounting for Relevance and Individual Knowledge. Quality of Fish from Catch to Consumer (pp. 393–400). Wageningen Academic Publisher, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lem, A., T. Bjorndal, & A. Lappo (2014) Economic Analysis of Supply and Demand for Food up to 2030 – Special Focus on Fish and Fishery Products. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1089. FAO, Rome, Italy. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3822e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1947) Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mercasa (2015) La alimentación en España: Producción, industria, distribución y consumo. [Food in Spain: production, industry, distribution and consumption]. Madrid: Mercasa. Retrieved from http://www.mercasa-ediciones.es/alimentacion_2015/AE2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P. (1996) Price relationships between domestic wild salmon, aquacultured rainbow trout and Norwegian farmed salmon in Finland. Proceedings of the VIIIth biennial conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade. July 1–4. 1996. Marrakech, International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M., J. Setälä, J. Laitinen, K. Saarni, J. Virtanen, & A. Honkanen (2007) Market integration of farmed trout in Germany. Marine Resource Economics, 22(2), 195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M., J. Smit, & J. Guillen (2009) Market integration of fish in Europe. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(2), 367–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman-López, A. & F. Asche (2008) Competition between imported tilapia and US catfish in the US market. Marine Resource Economics, 23(2), 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman-López, A. & T. Bjørndal (2009) Is tilapia the same product worldwide or are markets segmented? Aquaculture Economics & Management, 13(2), 138–154.
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M. (1986) Testing market integration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnier, E. & B. Bayramoglu (2016) Competition between farmed and wild fish: the French sea bass and sea bream markets. Aquaculture Economics & Management, E-pub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, G.R., R. Bande, & S. Villasante (2013) Origins matter: (No) market integration between cultured and wild gilthead sea bream in the Spanish seafood market. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 17(4), 380–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, J., P. Mickwitz, J. Virtanen, A. Honkanen, & K. Saarni (2003) The effect of trade liberation to the salmon market in Finland. In: Fisheries in the Global Economy—Proceedings of the XIth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (ed. B. Shallard), August 19–22, 2002. International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, D., S.F. Herrick Jr., & J. Hastie (1988) Integration of Japanese and United States sablefish markets. Fishery Bulletin, 87(0), 341–351.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G.J. (1969) The Theory of Price. Macmillan, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G.J. & R.A. Sherwin (1985) The extent of the market. Journal of Law and Economics, 28(3), 555–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., I. Sioen, K. Brunsø, S. De Henauw, & J. Van Camp (2007) Consumer perception versus scientific evidence of farmed and wild fish: Exploratory insights from Belgium. Aquaculture International, 15(2), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, J., J. Setälä, K. Saarni, & A. Honkanen (2005) Finnish salmon trout - Discriminated in the European market. Marine Resource Economics, 20(1), 113–119.
   Google Scholar