Labeling farmed seafood: A review

References

• Aarset, B., Beckmann, S., Bigne, E., Beveridge, M., Bjorndal, T., Bunting, J., McDonagh, P. … Young, J. (2004). The European consumers’ understanding and perceptions of the “organic” food regime: The case of aquaculture. British Food Journal, 106 (2), 93–105. doi:10.1108/00070700410516784
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, W., & Anders, S. (2012). The value of brand and convenience attributes in highly processed food products. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie, 60 (1), 113–133. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2011.01234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfnes, F. (2017). Selling only sustainable seafood: Attitudes toward public regulation and retailer policies. Marine Policy, 78, 74–79. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfnes, F., Guttormsen, A. G., Steine, G., & Kolstad, K. (2006). Consumers’ willingness to pay for the color of salmon: A choice experiment with real economic incentives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88 (4), 1050–1061. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, L., Azad, M. A. K., Gausmian, M. H., & Zulkifli, F. (2014). Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon. PLoS ONE, 9 (1), e86174. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., & Bettencourt, S. U. (1993). A conjoint approach to model product preferences: The New England market for fresh and frozen salmon. Marine Resource Economics, 8 (1), 31–49. doi:10.1086/mre.8.1.42629045
   Google Scholar
• Ankamah-Yeboah, I., Nielsen, M., & Nielsen, R. (2016). Price premium of organic salmon in Danish retail sale. Ecological Economics, 122, 54–60. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquaculture Stewardship Council. (2017). Certified. Retrieved from http://www.asc-aqua.org/index.cfm?act=tekst.item&iid=4&iids=204&lng=1 (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ariji, M. (2010). Conjoint analysis of consumer preference for bluefin tuna. Fisheries Science, 76 (6), 1023–1028. doi:10.1007/s12562-010-0297-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Larsen, T. A., Smith, M. D., Sogn-Grundvåg, G., & Young, J. A. (2015). Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity. Food Policy, 53, 82–93. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2004). Domestic country bias, country-of-origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: A multidimensional unfolding approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (1), 80–95. doi:10.1177/0092070303257644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington, K., Ridler, N., Chopin, T., Robinson, S., & Robinson, B. (2010). Social aspects of the sustainability of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Aquaculture International, 18 (2), 201–211. doi:10.1007/s10499-008-9236-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton, B., Murray, F., Young, J., Telfer, T., & Little, D. C. (2010). Passing the panda standard: A TAD off the mark? Ambio, 39 (1), 2–13. doi:10.1007/s13280-009-0009-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best Aquaculture Practices. (2017). Best aquaculture practices certification. Retrieved from https://www.bapcertification.org/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg Business. (2014). Why won’t the government let you eat superfish? Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-05-22/aquadvantage-gm-salmon-are-slow-to-win-fda-approval (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, C. E., & A. A. McNevin. (2015). Eco-label certification. In C. E. Boyd & A. A. McNevin (Eds.), Aquaculture, resource use, and the environment (pp. 297–319). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brécard, D., Lucas, S., Pichot, N., & Salladarré, F. (2012). Consumer preferences for eco, health and fair trade labels. An application to seafood product in France. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 10 (1), 1–32. doi:10.1515/1542-0485.1360
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, S., Millar, K., Wright, N., & Kaiser, M. (2015). Responsible techno-innovation in aquaculture: Employing ethical engagement to explore attitudes to GM salmon in Northern Europe. Aquaculture, 437, 370–381. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burros, M. (2008). Small type and large loopholes in new labeling laws. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/08/dining/08fish.html (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Bush, S. R., Belton, B., Hall, D., Vandergeest, P., Murray, F. J., Ponte, S., Oosterveer, P., … Kusumawati, R. (2013). Certify sustainable aquaculture? Science, 341 (6150), 1067–1068. doi:10.1126/science.1237314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S. R., Van Zwieten, P.A. M., Visser, L., van Dijk, H., Bosma, R., de Boer, W. F., & Verdegem, M. (2010). Scenarios for resilient shrimp aquaculture in tropical coastal areas. Ecology and Society, 15 (2), 15. doi:10.5751/es-03331-150215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, J. A., & Anders, S. M. (2011). Private versus third party versus government labeling. In J. L. Lusk, J. Roosen, & J. F. Shogren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy (pp. 472–498). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, J. A., & Mojduszka, E. M. (1996). Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78 (5), 1248–1253. doi:10.2307/1243501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, E., & Paquotte, P. (1999). Product differentiation, labelling and quality approach: Developments and stakes in the French shellfish market. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 3 (2), 121–129. doi:10.1080/13657309909380239
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Alfnes, F., & Rickertsen, K. (2015). Consumer preferences, ecolabels, and the effects of negative environmental information. AgBioForum, 18 (3), 327–336.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Garcia, R. J. (2016). Economic sanctions and trade diplomacy: Sanction-busting strategies, market distortion and efficacy of China’s restrictions against Norwegian salmon imports. China Information, 30 (1), 29–57. doi:10.1177/0920203x15625061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chern, W. S., Rickertsen, K., Tsuboi, N., & Fu, T.-T. (2002). Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for genetically modified vegetable oil and salmon: A multiple-country assessment. AgBioForum, 5 (3), 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Food Technology Net. (2014). Zhen jia sanwenyu de jianbie fangfa (Methods to identify genuine and fake salmon). Retrieved from http://www.tech-food.com/kndata/detail/k0135005.htm (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Constance, D. H., & Bonanno, A. (1999). Contested terrain of the global fisheries: “Dolphin-safe” tuna, the panama declaration, and the marine stewardship council. Rural Sociology, 64 (4), 597–623. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, K., Pan, M., Hu, W., & Poerwanto, D. (2012). Consumers’ willingness to pay for aquaculture fish products vs. wild-caught seafood—A case study in Hawaii. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 16 (2), 136–154. doi:10.1080/13657305.2012.678554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, M. M., Rabbani, A. G., Singh, K., & Engle, C. R. (2014). Determinants of retail price and sales volume of catfish products in the United States: An application of retail scanner data. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 18 (2), 120–148. doi:10.1080/13657305.2014.903312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, K., Grimsrud, K., Nielsen, H. M., Mejdell, C., Olesen, I., Honkanen, P., Navrud, S., … Sandøe, P. (2015). Who cares about fish welfare? A Norwegian study. British Food Journal, 117 (1), 257–273. doi:10.1108/bfj-08-2013-0223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, C. R., Quagrainie, K. K., & Dey, M. M. (2017). Seafood and aquaculture marketing handbook (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. (2005). Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_229_en.pdf (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (EC). (1999). Council regulation (EC) No. 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organization of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32000R0104 (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (EC). (2009). Commission regulation (EC) No. 710/2009 of 5 August 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of council regulation (EC) No. 834/2007, as regards laying down detailed rules on organic aquaculture animal and seaweed production. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009R0710 (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). (2011). Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011 of the European parliament and of the council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending regulations (EC) No. 1924/2006 and (EC) No. 1925/2006 of the European parliament and of the council, and repealing commission directive 87/250/EEC, council directive 90/496/EEC, commission directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European parliament and of the council, commission directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and commission regulation (EC) No. 608/2004 Text with EEA relevance. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/1169/oj (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Polanco, J., Loose, S. M., & Luna, L. (2013). Are retailers preferences for seafood attributes predictive for consumer wants? Results from a choice experiment for (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture Economics & Management, 17 (2), 103–122. doi:10.1080/13657305.2013.772262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FishWatch. (2017). Seafood fraud. Retrieved from http://www.fishwatch.gov/eating-seafood/fraud (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2012). Codex Alimentarius: Code of practice for fish and fishery products (2nd ed.). Rome, Italy: Joint publication with the World Health Organization, International Food Standards. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/standards/thematic-compilations/en/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2005). CPG sec. 560.200 country of origin labeling. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/iceci/compliancemanuals/compliancepolicyguidancemanual/ucm074567.htm (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2015). The seafood list. Retrieved from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=seafoodlist (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency. (2017). GM material in animal feed. Retrieved from https://www.food.gov.uk/science/novel/gm/gmanimal (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, O. I., & Guttormsen, A. G. (2006). Modeling optimal dietary pigmentation strategies in farmed Atlantic salmon: Application of mixed-integer non-linear mathematical programming techniques. Aquaculture, 261 (1), 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.06.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom Food. (2017). RSPCA welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon. Retrieved from https://science.rspca.org.uk/sciencegroup/farmanimals/standards/salmon (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Friend of the Sea. (2017). Friend of the sea—sustainable seafood. Retrieved from http://www.friendofthesea.org/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Grimsrud, K., Nielsen, H., Navrud, S., & Olesen, I. (2013). Households’ willingness-to-pay for improved fish welfare in breeding programs for farmed Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture, 372, 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert, K. G. (2005). Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32 (3), 369–391. doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbi011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardian. (2014). “ Revealed: Asian slave labour producing prawns for supermarkets in US, UK” Published online June, 10 2014. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jun/10/supermarket-prawns-thailand-produced-slave-labour (accessed May 29, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2009). The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Marine Policy, 33 (4), 654–660. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T. E., & Amberg, S. M. (2013). Factors influencing consumption of farmed seafood products in the Pacific northwest. Appetite, 66, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Wessells, C. R. (1998). Predicting consumer preferences for fresh salmon: The influence of safety inspection and production method attributes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1017/s1068280500001659
   Google Scholar
• Honkanen, P., & Olsen, S. O. (2009). Environmental and animal welfare issues in food choice: The case of farmed fish. British Food Journal, 111 (3), 293–309. doi:10.1108/00070700910941480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IKEA. (2016). Sustainability report FY14. Retrieved from http://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/img/ad_content/IKEA_Group_Sustainability_Report_FY16.pdf (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• International Foundation for Organic Agriculture (IFOAM). (2014). Organic aquaculture. EU regulations (EC) 834/2007, (EC) 889/2008, (EC) 710/2009. Background, assessment, interpretations. Retrieved from http://www.ifoam-eu.org/en/library/dossiers (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. (2015). Labeling GM foods. Retrieved from https://isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/7/default.asp (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jacquet, J. L., & Pauly, D. (2007). The rise of seafood awareness campaigns in an era of collapsing fisheries. Marine Policy, 31 (3), 308–313. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet, J. L., & Pauly, D. (2008). Trade secrets: Renaming and mislabeling of seafood. Marine Policy, 32 (3), 309–318. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffry, S., Pickering, H., Ghulam, Y., Whitmarsh, D., & Wattage, P. (2004). Consumer choices for quality and sustainability labelled seafood products in the UK. Food Policy, 29 (3), 215–228. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalonick, M. C. (2015a) FDA OKs genetically modified salmon for human consumption. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/fda-oks-genetically-modified-salmon-for-human-consumption/ (accessed May 1, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Jalonick, M. C. (2015b) USDA to propose standards for organic seafood raised in US. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/usda-propose-standards-organic-seafood-raised-u-s/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jan, M.-S., Fu, T.-T., & Liao, D. S. (2006). Willingness to pay for HACCP on seafood in Taiwan. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 10 (1), 33–46. doi:10.1080/13657300500315836
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, S.-T. (2010). The quality control status of cobia, Rachycentron canadum, and grouper, Epinephelus malabaricus, in Taiwan. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 41 (2), 266–273. doi:10.1111/j.1749-7345.2010.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., & Roheim, C. A. (2006). A battle of taste and environmental convictions for ecolabeled seafood: A contingent ranking experiment. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31 (2), 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnucan, H. W., Asche, F., Myrland, Ø., & Roheim, C. A. (2003). Advances in economics of marketing and implications for aquaculture development. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 7 (1–2), 35–53. doi:10.1080/13657300309380330
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., Msangi, S., Batka, M., Vannuccini, S., Dey, M. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2015). Fish to 2030: The role and opportunity for aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 19 (3), 282–300. doi:10.1080/13657305.2015.994240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kole, A., Kremer, S., Honkanen, P., Mejdell, C., & Schelvis, R. (2008). Qualitative assessment of potential market opportunities of welfare actions and indices in fish farming (Report, BENEFISH, project no: 044118, Deliverable 7.1). Tromsø, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, G., Engle, C., & Quagrainie, K. (2008). Household preferences and consumption patterns for farm-raised catfish in the US. Pine Bluff, AR: Cooperative extension program, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (ETB258).
   Google Scholar
• Label Rouge. (2017). Label Rouge. Retrieved from http://www.labelrouge.fr/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ledford, H. (2013). Transgenic salmon nears approval. Nature, 497 (7447), 17–18. doi:10.1038/497017a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loose, S. M., Peschel, A., & Grebitus, C. (2013). Quantifying effects of convenience and product packaging on consumer preferences and market share of seafood products: The case of oysters. Food Quality and Preference, 28 (2), 492–504. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009). Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91 (1), 184–196. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, G. (2015). The new ‘bait and switch’ on seafood. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ghislaine-maxwell/the-new-bait-and-switch-on-seafood_b_6984608.html (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• May, B., Leadbitter, D., Sutton, M., & Weber, M. (2003). The marine stewardship council (MSC). In B. Phillips, T. Ward, & C. Chaffee (Eds.), Eco-labelling in fisheries: What is it all about? (pp. 14–33). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Blackwell Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McClenachan, L., Dissanayake, S., & Chen, X. (2016). Fair trade fish: Consumer support for broader seafood sustainability. Fish and Fisheries, 17, 825–838. doi:10.1111/faf.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalsen, K. (2016). Antibiotika-fri norsk laks er blitt en slager i USAftenposten, A. April 23, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/okonomi/Antibiotika-fri-norsk-laks-er-blitt-en-slager-i-USA-57500b.html (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• National Organic Program. (2000). 7 CFR part 205—National organic program. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/7/part-205 (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78 (2), 311–329. doi:10.1086/259630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82 (4), 729–754. doi:10.1086/260231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nep, S., & O’Doherty, K. (2013). Understanding public calls for labeling of genetically modified foods: Analysis of a public deliberation on genetically modified salmon. Society & Natural Resources, 26 (5), 506–521. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.716904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T., Haider, W., Solgaard, H. S., Ravn-Jonsen, L., & Roth, E. (2015). Consumer willingness to pay for quality attributes of fresh seafood: A labeled latent class model. Food Quality and Preference, 41, 225–236. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, P. D., Glencross, B., Petrie, J. R., & Singh, S. P. (2014). Readily available sources of long-chain omega-3 oils: Is farmed Australian seafood a better source of the good oil than wild-caught seafood? Nutrients, 6 (3), 1063–1079. doi:10.3390/nu6031063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, P. D., Mooney, B. D., & Elliott, N. G. (2002). Nutritional value of Australian seafood II: Factors affecting oil composition of edible species. Hobart, Australia: CSIRO Marine Research, and Fisheries Research & Development Corporation (FRDC).
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, P. D., Petrie, J., & Singh, S. (2010). Long-chain omega-3 oils–an update on sustainable sources. Nutrients, 2 (6), 572–585. doi:10.3390/nu2060572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Seafood Council. (2017). How to use the country of origin mark. Retrieved from https://en.seafood.no/marketing/trademarks-and-labeling/how-to-use-the-country-of-origin-mark/ (accessed May 10, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, I., Alfnes, F., Røra, M. B., & Kolstad, K. (2010). Eliciting consumers’ willingness to pay for organic and welfare-labelled salmon in a non-hypothetical choice experiment. Livestock Science, 127 (2), 218–226. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ramírez, M., Almendarez-Hernández, M. A., Avilés-Polanco, G., & Beltrán-Morales, L. F. (2015). Consumer acceptance of eco-labeled fish: A Mexican case study. Sustainability, 7 (4), 4625–4642. doi:10.3390/su7044625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrolia, D. R., Collart, A. J., & Yehouenou, L. (2016). Consumer preferences for delacata catfish: A choice experiment with tasting. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 47 (3), 84–100.
   Google Scholar
• Pieniak, Z., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Consumer interest and marketing potential of information on fish labels. Paper presented at the 12th congress of the European association of agricultural economists (EAAE), Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Price, L. B., Koch, B. J., & Hungate, B. A. (2015). Ominous projections for global antibiotic use in food-animal production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (18), 5554–5555. doi:10.1073/pnas.1505312112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, W., & Brown, J. L. (2006). Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions: A qualitative approach. Science Communication, 28 (2), 243–272. doi:10.1177/1075547006294770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quagrainie, K., Hart, S., & Brown, P. (2008). Consumer acceptance of locally grown food: The case of Indiana aquaculture products. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 12 (1), 54–70. doi:10.1080/13657300801962591
   Google Scholar
• Rickertsen, K., Alfnes, F., Combris, P., Enderli, G., Issanchou, S., & Shogren, J. F. (2017). French consumers’ attitudes and preferences toward wild and farmed fish. Marine Resource Economics, 32 (1), 59–81. doi:10.1086/689202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. A. (2005). Ecolabelling and urban aquaculture. In B. Costa-Pierce, A. Desbonnet, P. Edwards, & D. Baker (Eds.), Urban aquaculture (pp. 259–266). Oxford, UK: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. (2008). The economics of ecolabelling. In T. Ward & B. Phillips (Eds.), Seafood ecolabelling: Principles and practice (pp. 38–57). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. A. (2009). An evaluation of sustainable seafood guides: Implications for environmental groups and the seafood industry. Marine Resource Economics, 24 (3), 301–310. doi:10.1086/mre.24.3.42629657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. A., Asche, F., & Santos, J. I. (2011). The elusive price premium for ecolabelled products: Evidence from seafood in the UK market. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62 (3), 655–668. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2011.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. A., Gardiner, L., & Asche, F. (2007). Value of brands and other attributes: Hedonic analysis of retail frozen fish in the UK. Marine Resource Economics, 22 (3), 239–253. doi:10.1086/mre.22.3.42629557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. A., Sudhakaran, P. O., & Durham, C. A. (2012). Certification of shrimp and salmon for best aquaculture practices: Assessing consumer preferences in Rhode Island. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 16 (3), 266–286. doi:10.1080/13657305.2012.713075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA). (2015). What we do. Retrieved from https://www.rspca.org.uk/whatwedo (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Salladarré, F., Guillotreau, P., Perraudeau, Y., & Monfort, M.-C. (2010). The demand for seafood eco-labels in France. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 8 (1). doi:10.2202/1542-0485.1308
   Google Scholar
• Saner, M. (2008). Ethics, governance and regulation. In K. Culver & D. Castle (Eds.), Aquaculture, innovation and social transformation (Vol. 17, pp. 115–121). The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwedler, T. E., & Johnson, S. K. (1999/2000). Animal welfare issues: Responsible care and health maintenance of seafood in commercial aquaculture. Animal Welfare Information Center Bulletin, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Seafood Watch. (2007). Official site of the Monterey Bay aquarium’s sustainable seafood program. Retrieved from https://www.seafoodwatch.org/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. D., Roheim, C. A., Crowder, L. B., Halpern, B. S., Turnipseed, M., Anderson, J. L., Asche, F., Bourillón, L., … Selkoe, K. A. (2010). Sustainability and global seafood. Science, 327 (5967), 784–786. doi:10.1126/science.1185345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogn-Grundvåg, G., Larsen, T. A., & Young, J. A. (2014). Product differentiation with credence attributes and private labels: The case of whitefish in UK supermarkets. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65 (2), 368–382. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solgaard, H. S., & Yang, Y. (2011). Consumers’ perception of farmed fish and willingness to pay for fish welfare. British Food Journal, 113 (8), 997–1010. doi:10.1108/00070701111153751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steine, G., Alfnes, F., & Rørå, M. B. (2005). The effect of color on consumer WTP for farmed salmon. Marine Resource Economics, 20 (2), 211–219. doi:10.1086/mre.20.2.42629470
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, J., & Mench, J. (2000). Animal welfare: Consumer viewpoints.Paper presented at the 2000 poultry symposium and egg processing workshop, University of California, Davis, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tacon, A. G., & Metian, M. (2008). Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture, 285 (1), 146–158. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teletchea, F., & Fontaine, P. (2014). Levels of domestication in fish: Implications for the sustainable future of aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries, 15 (2), 181–195. doi:10.1111/faf.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesco. (2017). Tesco Groceries. Retrieved from https://www.tesco.com/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Te Velde, H., Aarts, N., & Van Woerkum, C. (2002). Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15 (2), 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThisFish. (2017). What is ThisFish? Retrieved from http://thisfish.info/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Uchida, H., Onozaka, Y., Morita, T., & Managi, S. (2014). Demand for ecolabeled seafood in the Japanese market: A conjoint analysis of the impact of information and interaction with other labels. Food Policy, 44, 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2016). Federal register volume 81, number 111. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-06-09/html/2016-12899.htm (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2017). Agricultural marketing service—country of origin labeling. Retrieved from http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/COOL (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• United States Mission to the European Union. (2015). US–EU organic equivalency arrangement. Retrieved from http://www.usda-eu.org/trade-with-the-eu/trade-agreements/us-eu-organic-arrangement/ (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Upton, H. F. (2015). Seafood fraud. Retrieved from http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/RL34124.pdf (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Vandergeest, P. (2007). Certification and communities: Alternatives for regulating the environmental and social impacts of shrimp farming. World Development, 35 (7), 1152–1171. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., & Roosen, J. (2009). Market differentiation potential of country-of-origin, quality and traceability labeling. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 10 (1), 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., Sioen, I., Brunsø, K., De Henauw, S., & Van Camp, J. (2007). Consumer perception versus scientific evidence of farmed and wild fish: Exploratory insights from Belgium. Aquaculture International, 15 (2), 121–136. doi:10.1007/s10499-007-9072-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Zhang, J., Mu, W., Fu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2009). Consumers’ perception toward quality and safety of fishery products, Beijing, China. Food Control, 20 (10), 918–922. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C. E., Lusk, J. L., & Dutton, J. M. (2008). Implicit value of retail beef product attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 33 (3), 364–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Phillips, B. (2009). Seafood ecolabelling: Principles and practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K., Timme, W., Lowell, B., & Hirshfield, M. (2013). Oceana Study reveals seafood fraud nationwide. Retrieved from http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/National_Seafood_Fraud_Testing_Results_Highlights_FINAL.pdf (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Wessells, C. R. (2002). The economics of information: Markets for seafood attributes. Marine Resource Economics, 17 (2), 153–162. doi:10.1086/mre.17.2.42629358
   Google Scholar
• Wessells, C. R., & Anderson, J. G. (1995). Consumer willingness to pay for seafood safety assurances. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29 (1), 85–107. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.1995.tb00040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessells, C. R., Johnston, R. J., & Donath, H. (1999). Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: The influence of species, certifier, and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81 (5), 1084–1089. doi:10.2307/1244088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, F. F., Love, L. A., & Palma, M. A. (2007). Purchasing shrimp for at-home consumption: The relative importance of credence versus physical product features. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 11 (1), 17–38. doi:10.1080/13657300701202668
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, F., Winther, U., Hognes, E. S., Emanuelsson, A., Sund, V., & Ellingsen, H. (2013). The carbon footprint of Norwegian seafood products on the global seafood market. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17 (1), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar