Data envelopment analysis for analyzing technical efficiency in aquaculture: The bootstrap methods

References

• Alam, F. (2011). Measuring technical, allocative and cost efficiency of pangas (Pangasius hypophthalmus: Sauvage 1878) fish farmers of Bangladesh. Aquaculture Research, 42(10), 1487–1500. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02741.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, F., & Murshed-e-Jahan, M. (2008). Resource allocation efficiency of the prawn-carp farmers of Bangladesh. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 12(3), 188–206. doi:10.1080/13657300802332976
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264. doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anh Ngoc, P. T., Gaitán-Cremaschi, D., Meuwissen, M. P., Le, T. C., Bosma, R. H., Verreth, J., & Lansink, A. O. (2018). Technical inefficiency of Vietnamese pangasius farming: A data envelopment analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 22(2), 229–243. doi:10.1080/13657305.2017.1399296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anh, P. T., Kroeze, C., Bush, S. R., & Mol, A. P. (2010). Water pollution by intensive brackish shrimp farming in south-east Vietnam: Causes and options for control. Agricultural Water Management, 97(6), 872–882. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Guttormsen, A. G., & Nielsen, R. (2013). Future challenges for the maturing Norwegian salmon aquaculture industry: An analysis of total factor productivity change from 1996 to 2008. Aquaculture, 396, 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, H. T. N., The, B. D., & Speelman, S. (2018). Analyzing the variations in cost-efficiency of marine cage lobster aquaculture in Vietnam: A two-stage bootstrap DEA approach. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 22(4), 458–473. doi:10.1080/13657305.2018.1429032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badunenko, O., & Mozharovskyi, P. (2016). Nonparametric frontier analysis using Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 16(3), 550–589. doi:10.1177/1536867X1601600302
   Google Scholar
• Badunenko, O., & Tauchmann, H. (2019). Simar and Wilson two-stage efficiency analysis for Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 19(4), 950–988. doi:10.1177/1536867X19893640
   Google Scholar
• Balcombe, K., Fraser, I., Latruffe, L., Rahman, M., & Smith, L. (2008). An application of the DEA double bootstrap to examine sources of efficiency in Bangladesh rice farming. Applied Economics, 40(15), 1919–1925. doi:10.1080/00036840600905282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., & Chang, H. (2006). The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 1311–1320. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battese, G.E., & Coelli, T. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332. doi:10.1007/BF01205442
   Google Scholar
• Besstremyannaya, G. (2013). The impact of Japanese hospital financing reform on hospital efficiency: A difference‐in‐difference approach. Japanese Economic Review, 64(3), 337–362. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5876.2012.00585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2010). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R (Vol. 157). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. F., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Variation in inefficiency among US hospitals. Canadian Journal of Operational Research and Information Processing, 36, 84–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H., Boisvert, R.N., & Hung, L. (2010). Land subsidence, production efficiency and the decision of aquaculture firms in Taiwan to discontinue production. Ecological Economics, 69(12), 2448–2456. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinemre, H.A., Ceyhan, V., Bozoğlu, M., Demiryürek, K., & Kılıç, O. (2006). The cost efficiency of trout farms in the Black Sea region, Turkey. Aquaculture, 251(2–4), 324–332. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Plymouth, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Den, T. D., Ancev, T., & Harris, M. (2007). Technical efficiency of prawn farms in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. 51st AARES Annual Conference, February 13–16, 2007. Queenstown, NZ: Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, M. M., Paraguas, F. J., Srichantuk, N., Xinhua, Y., Bhatta, R., & Dung, C. L. T. (2005). Technical efficiency of freshwater pond polyculture production in selected Asian Countries. Estimation and implication. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 9(1), 39–63. doi:10.1080/13657300590961528
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2018). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 – Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome, Italy: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), 253–281. doi:10.2307/2343100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, F. D. S., Stasinakis, C., & Bardarova, V. (2018). Two-stage DEA – truncated regression: Application in banking efficiency and financial development. Expert Systems with Applications, 96, 284–301. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisheries Directorate of Vietnam. (2017). Overall scheme of developing Vietnam shrimp industry till 2030 (in Vietnamese). Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanpour, B., Ismail, M. M., Mohamed, Z., & Kamarulzaman, N. H. (2010). Sources of productivity growth in rainbow trout aquaculture in Iran: Technical efficiency change or technological progress? Aquaculture Economics & Management, 14(3), 218–234. doi:10.1080/13657305.2010.503474
   Google Scholar
• Iliyasu, A., & Mohamed, Z. A. (2015). Technical efficiency of tank culture systems in peninsular Malaysia: An application of data envelopment analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 19(4), 372–386. doi:10.1080/13657305.2015.1082118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliyasu, A., & Mohamed, Z. A. (2016). Evaluating contextual factors affecting the technical efficiency of freshwater pond culture systems in Peninsular Malaysia: A two-stage DEA approach. Aquaculture Reports, 3, 12–17. doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliyasu, A., Mohamed, Z. A., Ismail, M. M., Abdullah, A. M., Kamarudin, S. M., & Mazuki, H. (2014). A review of production frontier research in aquaculture (2001–2011). Aquaculture Economics & Management, 18(3), 221–247. doi:10.1080/13657305.2014.926464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliyasu, A., Mohamed, Z. A., & Terano, R. (2016). Comparative analysis of technical efficiency for different production culture systems and species of freshwater aquaculture in Peninsular Malaysia. Aquaculture Reports, 3, 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A.L., & Kuosmanen, T. (2012). One-stage and two-stage DEA estimation of the effects of contextual variables. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 559–570. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keramidou, I., & Mimis, A. (2011). An application of the double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis to investigate sources of efficiency in the Greek poultry sector. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 67(4), 675–686. doi:10.1017/S0043933911000754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiet, N. T., & Fisher, T. C. (2014). Efficiency analysis and the effect of pollution in the Mekong river delta. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 18(4), 325–343. doi:10.1080/13657305.2014.959209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., Msangi, S., Batka, M., Vannuccini, S., Dey, M. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2015). Fish to 2030: The role and opportunity for aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 19(3), 282–300. doi:10.1080/13657305.2015.994240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam Anh, N., Tung, P. B., Bosma, R., Verreth, J., Leemans, R., De Silva, S., & Lansink, A. O. (2018). Impact of climate change on the technical efficiency of striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 49(3), 570–581. doi:10.1111/jwas.12488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latruffe, L., Davidova, S., & Balcombe, K. (2008). Application of a double bootstrap to investigation of determinants of technical efficiency of farms in Central Europe. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29(2), 183–191. doi:10.1007/s11123-007-0074-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, L. K., & Binh, P. T. (2013). Profitability analysis for white leg shrimp aquaculture farms in Ninh Hoa town, Khanh Hoa province (in Vietnamese). Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ thủy sản (Journal of Fisheries Science and Technology), 2, 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Long, L. K., Thap, L. V., Thuy, P. T. T., & Thuy, N. X. (2016). Sustainable development of white-leg shrimp farming in the Vietnam’s southern central coastal provinces (in Vietnamese). University of Nha Trang, Khanh Hoa, Vietnam: Ministry of Education and Training Project (code: B2014-13-12).
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. (2009). Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 792–798. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., Khan, M. A., & Nielsen, R. (2019). Credit constraints and aquaculture productivity. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 23(4), 410–427. doi:10.1080/13657305.2019.1641571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. (2011). Green and technical efficient growth in Danish fresh water aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 15(4), 262–277. doi:10.1080/13657305.2011.624574
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. (2012). Introducing individual transferable quotas on nitrogen in Danish fresh water aquaculture: Production and profitability gains. Ecological Economics, 75, 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R., Andersen, J. L., & Bogetoft, P. (2014). Dynamic reallocation of marketable nitrogen emission permits in Danish freshwater aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics, 29(3), 219–239. doi:10.1086/677758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, O. B., & Petersen, N. C. (2016). Stochastic data envelopment analysis—A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(1), 2–21. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, K., & Vu, L. (2009). Economic efficiency in farm households: Trends, explanatory factors, and estimation methods. Agricultural Economics, 40(5), 587–599. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. T., Nielsen, R., Khan, M. A., & Asmild, M. (2019). Efficiency and production environmental heterogeneity in aquaculture: A meta-frontier DEA approach. Aquaculture, 509, 140–148. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, G. P., Reddy, M. N., Sontakki, B. S., & Prakash, D. B. (2008). Measurement of efficiency of shrimp (peneaus monodon) farmers in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(4), 653–657.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. K., & Jens, N. (2008). Econometric approach for estimation of technical efficiency of aquaculture farms. In A. K. Roy & N. Serangi (Eds.), Applied bioinformatics, statistics and economics in fisheries research (pp. 501–518). New Delhi, India: New India Publishing Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, K. R., & Leung, P. (2003). A review of production frontier analysis for aquaculture management. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 7(1–2), 15–34. doi:10.1080/13657300309380329
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simar, L. (2007). How to improve the performances of DEA/FDH estimators in the presence of noise? Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 183–201. doi:10.1007/s11123-007-0057-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61. doi:10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (2000). Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models. The state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(1), 49–78. doi:10.1007/s11123-010-0200-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2002). Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(1), 115–132. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00167-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2011). Two-stage DEA: Caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), 205–218. doi:10.1007/s11123-011-0230-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2013). Estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics, 5(3–4), 183–337. doi:10.1561/0800000020
   Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Zelenyuk, V. (2011). Stochastic FDH/DEA estimators for frontier analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(1), 1–20. doi:10.1007/s11123-010-0170-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simm, J., & Besstremyannaya, G. (2016). Package ‘rDEA’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rDEA/rDEA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Singbo, A. G., & Lansink, A. O. (2010). Lowland farming system inefficiency in Benin (West Africa): Directional distance function and truncated bootstrap approach. Food Security, 2(4), 367–382. doi:10.1007/s12571-010-0086-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singbo, A. G., Lansink, A. O., & Emvalomatis, G. (2014). Estimating farmers’ productive and marketing inefficiency: An application to vegetable producers in Benin. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(2), 157–169. doi:10.1007/s11123-014-0391-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinh, X. L. (2006). Major considerations on the fishery sector in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Paper presented to the CARD workshop, Cantho, Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Thap, L. V., Long, L. K., & Hoai, N. T. (2016). Analysis of technical efficiency of intensive white-leg shrimp farming in Ninh Thuan, Vietnam: An application of the double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis. Proceedings of the IIFET 2016 Scotland Conference, Oregon University, Eugene, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Theodoridis, A., Batzios, C., Ragkos, A., & Angelidis, P. (2017). Technical efficiency measurement of mussel aquaculture in Greece. Aquaculture International, 25(3), 1025–1037. doi:10.1007/s10499-016-0092-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuyet, B. D., Luong-Van, J., & Austin, C. M. (2012). Impact of shrimp farm effluent on water quality in coastal areas of the world heritage-listed Ha Long Bay. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 8(2), 104–116.
   Google Scholar
• Vassdal, T., & Sørensen Holst, H. M. (2011). Technical progress and regress in Norwegian salmon farming: A Malmquist index approach. Marine Resource Economics, 26(4), 329–341. doi:10.5950/0738-1360-26.4.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, X., Wang, A., Zhou, H., Wang, Q., Li, Z., & Shao, P. (2014). Economic efficiency of crucian carp (Carassius auratus Gibelio) polyculture farmers in the coastal area of Yancheng City. China. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14(2), 429–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zongli, Z., Yanan, Z., Feifan, L., Hui, Y., Yongming, Y., & Xinhua, Y. (2017). Economic efficiency of small-scale tilapia farms in Guangxi, China. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 21(2), 283–294. doi:10.1080/13657305.2016.1180644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar