Quantifying the effect of market information on demand for genetically modified salmon

References

• Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (2016). Pub. L. No. 114–216, 7 U.S.C. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/764/text?resultIndex=1
   Google Scholar
• Alfnes, F., Chen, X., & Rickertsen, K. (2018). Labeling farmed seafood: A review. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2017.1356398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfnes, F., Guttormsen, A. G., Steine, G., & Kolstad, K. (2006). Consumers’ willingness to pay for the color of salmon: A choice experiment with real economic incentives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 1050–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, L., Azad, M. A. K., Gausmian, M. H., & Zulkifli, F. (2014). Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon. PLoS One, 9(1), e86174https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankamah-Yeboah, I., Nielsen, M., & Nielsen, R. (2016). Price premium of organic salmon in Danish retail sale. Ecological Economics, 122(Supplement C), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.028
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F. (2008). Farming the sea. Marine Resource Economics, 23(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.23.4.42629678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton, B., Reardon, T., & Zilberman, D. (2020). Sustainable commoditization of seafood. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0540-7
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. C., & Bernard, D. J. (2010). Comparing parts with the whole: Willingness to pay for pesticide-free, non-GM, and organic potatoes and sweet corn. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.97858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. C., Pesek, J. D., & Pan, X. (2007). Consumer likelihood to purchase chickens with novel production attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 39(3), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800023282
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. C., Zhang, C., & Gifford, K. (2006). An experimental investigation of consumer willingness to pay for non-GM foods when an organic option is present. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35(2), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500006808
   Google Scholar
• Bonroy, O., & Constantatos, C. (2015). On the economics of labels: How their introduction affects the functioning of markets and the welfare of all participants. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, C. (2018, September 14). USDA eyes Dec. 1 for final GMO labeling rule. POLITICO Pro. https://subscriber.politicopro.com/agriculture/whiteboard/2018/09/usda-eyes-dec-1-for-final-gmo-labeling-rule-1904831
   Google Scholar
• Bovay, J., & Alston, J. M. (2018). GMO food labels in the United States: Economic implications of the new law. Food Policy, 78, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronnmann, J., & Asche, F. (2017). Sustainable seafood from aquaculture and wild fisheries: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Ecological Economics, 142, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugbee, M., & Loureiro, M. L. (2003). A risk perception analysis of genetically modified foods based on stated preferences. Selected Paper Presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings, Montreal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.22017
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, B. L., Hayes, D. J., Shogren, J. F., & Kliebenstein, J. B. (1993). Valuing ambiguity: The case of genetically engineered growth enhancers. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18(2), 175–184. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org.uri.idm.oclc.org/stable/40986790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., Hutchinson, G., & Scarpa, R. (2007). Using mixed logit models to derive individual-specific WTP estimates for landscape improvements under agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from the rural Environmental Protection Scheme in Ireland. In E. Birol & P. Koundouri (Eds.), Choice experiments informing European environmental policy. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., & Nardone, G. (2015). Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite, 84, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T., & Czajkowski, M. (2019). A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 95, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chern, W. S. (2006). Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and sustainability in agriculture. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, August 12–18, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chern, W. S., Rickertsen, K., Tsuboi, N., & Fu, T.-T. (2002). Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for genetically modified vegetable oil and salmon: A multiple-country assessment. AgBioForum, 5, 105–112. http://agbioforum.org/v5n3/v5n3a05-chern.htm
   Google Scholar
• Colson, G. J., Huffman, W. E., & Rousu, M. C. (2011). Improving the nutrient content of food through genetic modification: Evidence from experimental auctions on consumer acceptance. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 36(2), 343–364. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23243085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, J., & Mossialos, E. (2005). Is dread of Genetically Modified food associated with the consumers’ demand for information? Applied Economics Letters, 12(14), 859–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500365830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanigro, M., & Lusk, J. L. (2014). The signaling effect of mandatory labels on genetically engineered food. Food Policy, 49, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, K. R., McCluskey, J. J., & Wahl, T. I. (2004). Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World. AgBioForum, 7(1 & 2), 70–75. http://www.agbioforum.org/v7n12/v7n12a13-mccluskey.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, A. (2009). The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food—A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 68(8-9), 2182–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. (2017). Study of electronic or digital link disclosure a third-party evaluation of challenges impacting access to bioengineered food disclosure (p. 74). United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/USDADeloitteStudyofElectronicorDigitalDisclosure20170801.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1985). Bootstrap confidence intervals for a class of parametric problems. Biometrika, 72(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner, R., & Sylvia, G. (2015). Willingness to pay for multiple seafood labels in a niche market. Marine Resource Economics, 30(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/679466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2020). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020 – Sustainability in action. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1998). The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production. Agriculture and Human Values, 15(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007465730039
   Google Scholar
• Garlock, T., Asche, F., Anderson, J., Bjørndal, T., Kumar, G., Lorenzen, K., Ropicki, A., Smith, M. D., & Tveterås, R. (2020). A global blue revolution: Aquaculture growth across regions, species, and countries. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 28(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1678111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Allum, N., & Stares, S. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002: Eurobarometer 58.0. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Torgersen, H., Hampel, J., & Bardes, J. (2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 24(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00421.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2012). NLOGIT version 5.0 reference guide. Econometric Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Grunert, K. G., Lähteenmäki, L., Asger Nielsen, N., Poulsen, J. B., Ueland, O., & Åström, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification—Results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries. Food Quality and Preference, 12(8), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttormsen, A. G. (2002). Input factor substitutability in salmon aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics, 17(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.17.2.42629354
   Google Scholar
• He, N., & Bernard, J. C. (2011). Differences in WTP and consumer demand for organic and non-GM fresh and processed foods. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 40(2), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500008029
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., & Greene, W. H. (2003). The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation, 30(2), 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2015). Applied choice analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S., Lagerkvist, C. J., Redekop, W., & Pakseresht, A. (2016). Consumers’ evaluation of biotechnologically modified food products: New evidence from a meta-survey. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(5), 703–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbw011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbeln, J. R., Davis, J. M., Steer, C., Emmett, P., Rogers, I., Williams, C., & Golding, J. (2007). Maternal seafood consumption in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood (ALSPAC study): An observational cohort study. The Lancet, 369(9561), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60277-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hingston, S. T., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2018). Why consumers don’t see the benefits of genetically modified foods, and what marketers can do about it. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.17.0100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, F., Onyango, B., Schilling, B., Hallman, W., & Adelaja, A. (2003). Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(5), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00303.x
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, W. E., Rousu, M., Shogren, J. F., & Tegene, A. (2007). The effects of prior beliefs and learning on consumers’ acceptance of genetically modified foods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffry, S., Pickering, H., Ghulam, Y., Whitmarsh, D., & Wattage, P. (2004). Consumer choices for quality and sustainability labelled seafood products in the UK. Food Policy, 29(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S., & Burton, M. (2003). Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(4), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko, N., & Chern, W. S. (2005). Willingness to pay for genetically modified oil, cornflakes, and salmon: Evidence from a U.S. telephone survey. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 37(3), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800027188
   Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky, J., & Lusk, J. L. (2018). Mandatory labels can improve attitudes toward genetically engineered food. Science Advances, 4(6), eaaq1413. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I., & Robb, A. L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715–719. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznesof, S., & Ritson, C. (1996). Consumer acceptability of genetically modified foods with special reference to farmed salmon. British Food Journal, 98(4/5), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709610119874
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., Bernard, J. C., Johnston, Z. A., Messer, K. D., & Kaiser, H. M. (2017). Consumer preferences before and after a food safety scare: An experimental analysis of the 2010 egg recall. Food Policy, 66, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Huang, J.-C., & Brown, G. L. (1998). Information and risk perception: A dynamic adjustment process. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 18(6), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01113.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M. L., & Hine, S. (2002). Discovering niche markets: A comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado grown), organic, and GMO-free products. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 34(3), 477–487. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800009251
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., & Rozan, A. (2008). Public policy and endogenous beliefs: The case of genetically modified food. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 33(2), 270–289. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41220627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Valli, C., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., Morrow, J. L., & Traill, W. B. (2004). Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: Evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 31(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/31.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., & Taulman, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30(1), 28–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40987259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., McFadden, B. R., & Rickard, B. J. (2015). Which biotech foods are most acceptable to the public? Biotechnology Journal, 10(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., McFadden, B. R., & Wilson, N. (2018). Do consumers care how a genetically engineered food was created or who created it? Food Policy, 78, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., & Fox, J. A. (2003). Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: A comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(1), 16–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1244924 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutter, R., & Tucker, K. (2002). Unacknowledged health benefits of genetically modified food: Salmon and heart disease deaths. AgBioForum, 5(2), 59–64. http://www.agbioforum.org/v5n2/v5n2a04-lutter.htm
   Google Scholar
• Marette, S., Roosen, J. (2011). Bans and labels with controversial food technologies. In J. Lusk, J. Roosen, & J. F. Shogren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199569441.013.0020
   Google Scholar
• McCredie, M. N., & Morey, L. C. (2019). Who are the Turkers? A characterization of MTurk workers using the personality assessment inventory. Assessment, 26(5), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118760709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, B. R., & Lusk, J. L. (2015). Cognitive biases in the assimilation of scientific information on global warming and genetically modified food. Food Policy, 54, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, B. R., & Lusk, J. L. (2018). Effects of the national bioengineered food disclosure standard: Willingness to pay for labels that communicate the presence or absence of genetic modification. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, L. (2007). Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxm001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhetres, J., Rutjens, B. T., Weinstein, N., & Brisson, J. A. (2019). Modifying attitudes about modified foods: Increased knowledge leads to more positive attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer, K. D., Costanigro, M., & Kaiser, H. M. (2017). Labeling food processes: The good, the bad and the ugly. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 39(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian, D., & Rimm, E. B. (2006). Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: Evaluating the risks and the benefits. JAMA, 296(15), 1885–1899. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.15.1885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Fisheries Institute. (2018, December 13). Top 10 list shows significant increase in seafood consumption. About Seafood. https://www.aboutseafood.com/press_release/top-10-list-shows-significant-increase-in-seafood-consumption/
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, A. (2019). The state of organic aquaculture in the United States (p. 8). National Agricultural Law Center. https://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/soaus.pd_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, I., Alfnes, F., Røra, M. B., & Kolstad, K. (2010). Eliciting consumers’ willingness to pay for organic and welfare-labelled salmon in a non-hypothetical choice experiment. Livestock Science, 127(2–3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orme, B. K. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research (1st ed.). Research Publishers, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, D. L., Lusk, J. L., Lin, W., & Caputo, V. (2020). Predicting responsiveness to information: Consumer acceptance of biotechnology in animal products. European Review of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaa003
   Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. (1998). Is the negative more relevant than the positive? Cognitive responses to TV programs and newspaper articles on genetic engineering. 5th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) (pp. 17–19).
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). The new food fights: U.S. public divides over food science. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/01/the-new-food-fights/
   Google Scholar
• Qin, W., & Brown, J. L. (2006). Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions: A qualitative approach. Science Communication, 28(2), 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547006294770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelt, D., & Train, K. E. (2000). Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit: Households’ choice of electric supplier [Working paper]. University Library of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Rickertsen, K., Gustavsen, G. W., & Nayga, R. M. Jr. (2017). Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified vegetable oil and salmon in the United States and Norway. AgBioForum, 20(2), 94–104. http://www.agbioforum.org/v20n2/v20n2a02-rickertsen.htm
   Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. A., Bush, S. R., Asche, F., Sanchirico, J. N., & Uchida, H. (2018). Evolution and future of the sustainable seafood market. Nature Sustainability, 1(8), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0115-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roheim, C. A., Sudhakaran, P. O., & Durham, C. A. (2012). Certification of shrimp and salmon for best aquaculture practices: Assessing consumer preferences in Rhode Island. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 16(3), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2012.713075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousu, M., Huffman, W. E., Shogren, J. F., & Tegene, A. (2007). Effects and value of verifiable information in a controversial market: Evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified food. Economic Inquiry, 45(3), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholderer, J., & Frewer, L. J. (2003). The biotechnology communication paradox: Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(2), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023695519981
   Google Scholar
• Shamshak, G. L., Anderson, J. L., Asche, F., Garlock, T., & Love, D. C. (2019). U.S. seafood consumption. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 50(4), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. D., Asche, F., Guttormsen, A. G., & Wiener, J. B. (2010). Food safety. Genetically modified salmon and full impact assessment. Science (New York, N.Y.), 330(6007), 1052–1053. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J.-B E. M. (1990). Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 21(4), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90019-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisl, M. F., Roe, B., & Hicks, R. L. (2002). Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uchida, H., Onozaka, Y., Morita, T., & Managi, S. (2014). Demand for ecolabeled seafood in the Japanese market: A conjoint analysis of the impact of information and interaction with other labels. Food Policy, 44, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida, H., Roheim, C. A., & Johnston, R. J. (2017). Balancing the health risks and benefits of seafood: How does available guidance affect consumer choices? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(4), 1056–1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aax025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2017a). DP05: ACS demographic and housing estimates. 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. United States Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office. http://factfinder2.census.gov
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2017b). S1501: Educational attainment. 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. United States Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office. http://factfinder2.census.gov
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2017c). S2501: Occupancy characteristics. 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. United States Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office. http://factfinder2.census.gov
   Google Scholar
• Valente, M., & Chaves, C. (2018). Perceptions and valuation of GM food: A study on the impact and importance of information provision. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4110–4118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachenheim, C., Lambert, D., & Van Wechel, T. (2007). Willingness to pay for genetically modified foods under differing information scenarios. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 13(4), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J038v13n04_04
   Google Scholar
• Wessells, C. R., & Anderson, J. G. (1995). Consumer willingness to pay for seafood safety assurances. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1995.tb00040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, G. E., Gendron, C., Larue, B., & Lambert, R. (2002). Consumers’ valuation of functional properties of foods: Results from a Canada-wide survey. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d Agroeconomie, 50(4), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2002.tb00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilberman, D., Kaplan, S., & Gordon, B. (2018). The political economy of labeling. Special Issue on the Economics and Politics GM Food Labeling, 78, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.008
   Google Scholar