Technical efficiency and environmental impact of seabream and seabass farms

References

• Artusi, R., Verderio, P., & Marubini, E. (2002). Bravais-Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients: Meaning, test of hypothesis and confidence interval. The International Journal of Biological Markers, 17(2), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.5301/jbm.2008.2127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., & Roll, K. H. (2013). Determinants of inefficiency in Norwegian salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 17(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2013.812154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F. (2008). Farming the sea. Marine Resource Economics, 23(4), 527–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., & Bjørndal, T. (2011). The economics of salmon aquaculture. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Dahl, R. E., Gordon, D. V., Trollvik, T., & Aandahl, P. (2011). Demand growth for salmon in the European market. Marine Resource Economics, 26(4), 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Guttormsen, A. G., & Tveteraas, R. (1999). Environmental problems, productivity and innovations in Norwegian salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 3(1), 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Guttormsen, A. G., & Nielsen, R. (2013). Future challenges for the maturing Norwegian salmon aquaculture: An analysis of total factor productivity change from 1996 to 2008. Aquaculture, 396–399, 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Roll, K. H., Sandvold, H. N., Sørvig, A., & Zhang, D. (2013). Salmon aquaculture: Larger companies and increased production. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 17 (3), 322–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Roll, K. H., & Tveterås, R. (2007). Productivity growth in the supply chain—Another source of competitiveness for aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics, 22 (3), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.22.3.42629562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Roll, K. H., & Tveterås, R. (2009). Future trends in aquaculture: Productivity growth and increased production. economic inefficiency and environmental impact: An application to aquaculture production. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(1), 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Sikveland, M., & Zhang, D. (2018). Profitability in Norwegian salmon farming: The impact of firm size and price variability. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 21(3), 306–317.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17(1), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergesen, O., & Tveterås, R. (2019). Innovation in seafood value chains: The case of Norway. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 23(3), 292–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozoglu, M., & Ceyhan, V. (2009). Energy conversion efficiency of trout and sea bass production in the Black Sea. Turkey. Energy, 34, 199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1979). Short communication: Measuring efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(4), 339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cidad, M., Peral, I., Ramos, S., Basurco, B., López-Francos, A., Muniesa, A., Cavallo, M., Pérez, J., Aguilera, C., Furones, D., Reverté, C., Sanjuan-Vilaplana, A., Brun, E., Jansen, M. D., Tavornpanich, S., Raux, P., Baraibar, E., Cobo, A., Fernández-Polanco, J. M., … Komen, H. (2018). Assessment of Mediterranean aquaculture sustainability. Deliverable 1.2 of the Horizon 2020 project MedAID (GA number 727315), published in the project web site on 21.12.2018. http://www.medaid-h2020.eu/index.php/deliverables/
   Google Scholar
• Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnel, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Point source pollution report (Punktkilde rapport 2018). Danish Ministry for Environment and Food, December 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Di Trapani, A. M., Sgroi, F., Testa, R., & Tudisca, S. (2014). Economic comparison between offshore and inshore aquaculture production systems of European sea bass in Italy. Aquaculture, 434, 334–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. (2020). Fisheries and aquaculture information and statistics branch. FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Flaten, O., Lien, G., Koesling, M., Valle, P. S., & Ebbesvik, M. (2005). Comparing risk perceptions and risk management in organic and conventional dairy farming: Empirical results from Norway. Livestock Production Science, 95(1–2), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.10.014
   Google Scholar
• Gasca-Leyva, E., C. J., León, J. M., Herna´Ndez & J. M. Vergara, (2002). Bioeconomic analysis of production location of sea bream (Sparus aurata) cultivation. Aquaculture, 213(1–4), 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillen, J., Asche, F., Carvalho, N., Polanco, J. M. F., Llorente, I., Nielsen, R., Nielsen, M., & Villasante, S. (2019). Aquaculture subsidies in the European Union: Evolution, impact and future potential for growth. Marine Policy, 104, 19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttormsen, A. (2002). Input factor substitutability in Salmon aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics, 17(2), 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Guttormsen, A. (2008). Faustmann in the sea: Optimal rotation in aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics, 23(4), 401–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliyasu, A., Mohamed, Z. A., Ismail, M. M., Abdullah, A. M., Mohamed Kamarudin, S., & Mazuki, H. (2014). A review of production frontier research in aquaculture (2001–2011). Aquaculture Economics & Management, 18(3), 221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, G., & Katranidis, S. D. (2000). A production function analysis of seabass and seabream production in Greece. World Aquaculture Society, 31(3), 297–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, G., Katranidis, S. D., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2000). Measuring technical, allocative and cost efficiencies of seabass and seabream farms in Greece. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 4(3–4), 191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, G., Katranidis, S. D., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2002). Measuring and attributing technical inefficiencies of seabass and seabream production in Greece. Applied Economics Letters, 9(8), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850110099293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçak, Ö., & Tatlıdil, F. F. (2004). Cost analysis in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax Linnaeus, 1758) production in Milas District-Muğla Province, Turkey. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 4(1), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Le Kim, L., Van Thap, L., Nguyen, T. H., & Thanh Pham T. T. (2020). Data envelopment analysis for analyzing technical efficiency in aquaculture: The bootstrap methods. Aquaculture Economics & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2019.1710876
   Google Scholar
• Lien, G., O. Flaten, O., Jervell, A. M., Ebbesvik, M., & Koesling, P. S. (2006). Management and risk characteristics of part-time and full-time farmers in Norway. Review of Agriculture Economics, 1, 111–131.
   Google Scholar
• Llorente, I., & Luna, L. (2012). Explanatory model of the profitability of marine fish farming companies. Empirical application to the breeding of seabream (Sparus aurata) and European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in Spain. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economics, 12(2), 31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Llorente, I., & Luna, L. (2014). Economic optimisation in seabream (Sparus aurata) aquaculture production using a particle swarm optimisation algorithm. Aquaculture International, 22(6), 1837–1849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorente, I., Fernández-Polanco, J., Baraibar-Diez, E., Odriozola, M. D., Bjørndal, T., Asche, F., Guillen, J., Avdelas, L., Nielsen, R., Cozzolino, M., Luna, M., Fernández-Sánchez, J. L., Luna, L., Aguilera, C., & Basurco, B. (2020). Assessment of the economic performance of the seabream and seabass aquaculture industry in the European Union. Marine Policy, 117, 103876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. (2011). Green and technical efficient growth in Danish fresh water aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 15(4), 262–277.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. (2012). Introducing individual transferable quotas on nitrogen in Danish fresh water aquaculture: Production and profitability gains. Ecological Economics, 75, 83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R., Andersen, J. L., & Bogetoft, P. (2014). Dynamic reallocation of marketable nitrogen emission permits in Danish freshwater aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics, 29(3), 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R., Asche, F., & Nielsen, M. (2016). Restructuring European freshwater aquaculture from family owned to large scale firms – Lessons from Danish aquaculture. Aquaculture Research, 47(12), 3852–3866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantzios, C. J., Karagiannis, G., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2011). Parametric decomposition of the input-oriented Malmquist productivity index: With an application to Greek aquaculture. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(1), 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad, F. (2007). Evaluation of the sea bass and sea bream industry in the Mediterranean, with emphasis on Turkey. In P. Leung, C. -S. Lee, & P. J. O'Bryen (Eds.), Species and system selection for sustainable aquaculture. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rad, F., & Köksal, G. (2000). An overview of aquaculture in Turkey: With emphasis on sea bass and sea bream. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 4(3–4), 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha-Aponte, F., & Tveterås, S. (2019). On the drivers of cost changes in the Norwegian salmon aquaculture sector: A decomposition of a flexible cost function from 2001 to 2014. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 23 (3), 276–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, K. H. (2019). Moral hazard: The effect of insurance on risk and efficiency. Agricultural Economics, 50 (3), 367–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K. R., & Leung, R. S. (2003). A review if production frontier analysis for aquaculture management. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 7(1–2), 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1999). Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3), 459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000a). A general methodology for Bootstrapping in nonparametric frontier Models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(6), 779–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000b). Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007864806704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotorrío, L. L. (2002). Economic analysis of finfish mariculture operations in Spain. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 6 (1–2)2002), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300209380304
   Google Scholar
• Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries. (2014). The economic performance of the EU aquaculture sector (STECF 14-18). Publications Office of the European Union, EUR 27033 EN, JRC 93169. 451 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries. (2016). Economic report of the EU aquaculture sector (EWG-16-12). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg; EUR 28356 EN. https://doi.org/10.2788/677322
   Google Scholar
• Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries. (2018). Scientific, economic report of the EU aquaculture sector (STECF-18-19). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 978-92-79-79402-5, https://doi.org/10.2760/45076,JRC114801
   Google Scholar
• Tveterås, R., & Heshmati, A. (2002). Patterns of productivity growth in the Norwegian salmon farming industry (SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 301). Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Tveterås, S. (2002). Norwegian salmon aquaculture and sustainability: The relationship between environmental quality and industry growth. Marine Resource Economics, 17(2), 121–132.
   Google Scholar