Nutrient policies and the performance of aquaculture in developed countries – a literature review

References

• Abate, T. G., Nielsen, R., & Tveterås, R. (2016). Stringency of environmental regulation and aquaculture growth: A cross-country analysis. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 20(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2016.1156191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afewerki, S., Asche, F., Misund, B., Thorvaldsen, T., & Tveteras, R. (2023). Innovation in the Norwegian aquaculture industry. Reviews in Aquaculture, 15(2), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Asche, F., & Garlock, T. (2019). Economics of aquaculture policy & regulation. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093750
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, H., Eriksson, B. L., Hjerdt, N., Lindström, G., Löptien, U., & Strömqvist, J. (2016). Översikt av beräkningsmodeller för bedömning av fiskodlingars näringsämnesbelastning på sjöar, vattendrag, magasin och kustvatten (”Overview of numerical models for assessing the impacts of nutrient loads in lakes, rivers, reservoirs and coastal waters from aquaculture”). SMHI (Sveriges Meteorologiska and Hydrologiska Institut), Oceanografi, 64.
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Eggert, H., Oglend, A., Roheim, C. A., & Smith, M. D. (2022). Aquaculture: Externalities and policy options. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 16(2), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1086/721055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Guttormsen, A. G., & Tveterås, R. (1999). Environmental problems, productivity and innovations in Norwegian salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 3(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-7313.1999.00034.x
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Roll, K. H., & Tveteras, R. (2009). Economic inefficiency and environmental impact: An application to aquaculture production. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartkowski, B., Droste, N., Ließ, M., Sidemo-Holm, W., Weller, U., & Brady, M. V. (2021). Payments by modelled results: A novel design for agri-environmental schemes. Land Use Policy, 102, 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. V., Andersen, M. S., Andersson, A., Kilis, E., Saarela, S.-R., & Hvarregaard Thorsøe, M. (2022). Strengthening the policy framework to resolve lax implementation of the Baltic Sea action plan for agriculture. Ambio, 51(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01573-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. (2002). Pollution control options for Australian prawn farms. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 6(5–6), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300209380322
   Google Scholar
• Buschmann, A. H., Hernández-González, C., Aranda, Chopin, T., Neori, A., Halling, C., & Troell, M. (2008). Mariculture waste management. In Sven Erik Jørgensen & Brian D. Fath (Editor-in-Chief), Ecological engineering. Vol. [3] of encyclopedia of ecology., 5 vols (pp. 2211–2217). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cammies, C., Mytton, D., & Crichton, R. (2021). Exploring economic and legal barriers to commercial aquaponics in the EU through the lens of the UK and policy proposals to address them. Aquaculture International, 29(3), 1245–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00690-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopin, T. (2010). Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Chapter 9 in advancing the aquaculture agenda – workshop proceedings from the workshop “Advancing the aquaculture agenda: Policies to ensure a sustainable aquaculture sector” organized by the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264088726-en.pdf?expires=1707222113&id=id&accname=ocid177253&checksum=9565FDE2DA8CC1B71ECD345F05FB2F59
   Google Scholar
• Chopin, T., Buschmann, A. H., Halling, C., Troell, M., Kautsky, N., Neori, A., Kraemer, G. P., Zertuche-González, J. A., Yarish, C., & Neefus, C. (2001). Integrating seaweeds into marine aquaculture systems: a key toward sustainability. Journal of Phycology, 37(6), 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinesen, G. E., Timmermann, K., Roth, E., Markager, S., Ravn-Jonsen, L., Hjorth, M., Holmer, M., & Støttrup, J. G. (2011). Mussel production and water framework directie targets in the Limfjord, Denmark: an integrated assessment for use in system-based management. Ecology and Society, 16(4), 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04259-160426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, C. R. (2007). Species-specific public policy for sustainable development: The U.S. catfish industry. In P. Leung, C. Lee, & P.J. ÓBryen (Eds.), Species and system selection. Blackwell publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, C. R., Pomerleau, S., Fornshell, G., Hinshaw, J. M., Sloan, D., & Thompson, S. (2005). The economic impact of proposed effluent treatment options for production of trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in flow-through systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 32(2), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, C. R., & Valderrama, D. (2003). Farm-level costs of settling basins for treatment of effluents from levee-style catfish ponds. Aquacultural Engineering, 28(3–4), 171–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(03)00027-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, C. R., van Senten, J., & Fornshell, G. (2019). Regulatory costs on U.S. salmonid farms. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 50(3), 522–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, C. R., & Wossink, A. (2009). Economics of aquaculture better management practices. Chapter 13 in Environmental best management practices for US Aquaculture. (Editors C. S. Tucker & J. A. Hargraves). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2021). Chesapeake Bay TMDL Fact Sheet. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/bay_tmdl_fact_sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, S., Langeland, M., Wikberg, D., Nilsson, J., & Sundell, K. S. (2019). Översikt av tekniker för odling av vattenlevande organismer i Sverige – miljöpåverkan, odlingssystem, odlingsarter och foder. (“Overview of technologies for growing aquatic organisms in Sweden – environmental effects, technologies, species and feed”). Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. G., & Bricker, S. B. (2016). Goods and services of extensive aquaculture: shellfish culture and nutrient trading. Aquaculture International, 24(3), 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9949-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. G., Hawkins, A. J. S., & Bricker, S. B. (2007). Management of productivity, environmental effects and profitability and shellfish aquaculture – the Farm Aquaculture Resource Management (FARM) model. Aquaculture, 264(1–4), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. G., Saurel, C., Lencart e Silva, J. D., Nunes, J. P., & Vazquez, F. (2014). Modelling of interactions between inshore and offshore aquaculture. Aquaculture, 426–427, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. G., Sequeira, A., Hawkins, J. J. :S., Newton, A., Nickell, T. D., Pastres, R., Forte, J., Bodoy, A., & Bricker, S. B. (2009). Analysis of coastal and offshore aquaculture: Application of the FARM model to multiple systems and shellfish species. Aquaculture, 289(1–2), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippelli, R., Termansen, M., Hasan, S., Hasler, B., Hansen, L., & Smart, J. C. R. (2022). Water quality trading markets – Integrating land and marine based measures under a smart market approach. Ecological Economics, 200, 107549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippelli, R., Termansen, M., Hasler, B., Timmermann, K., & Petersen, J. K. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of mussel farming as a water quality improvement measure: Agricultural, environmental and market drivers. Water Resources and Economics, 32, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2020.100168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, J. F. (2019). Evaluating oyster aquaculture’s cost-effectiveness as a nitrogen removal best management practice – a case study of the Delaware inland bays. Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15351/2373-8456.1064
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Kautsky, N., & Troell, M. (1994). The costs of eutrophication from salmon farming: Implications for policy. Journal of Environmental Management, 40(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1994.1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong See, K. F., Adawiyah Ibrahim, R., & Goh, K. H. (2021). Aquaculture efficiency and productivity: A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis. Aquaculture, 544, 736881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Føre, H. M., Thorvaldsen, T., Osmundsen, T. C., Asche, F., Tveterås, R., Fagertun, J. T., & Bjelland, H. V. (2022). Technological innovations promoting sustainable salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture in Norway. Aquaculture Reports, 24, 101115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlock, T., Asche, F., Anderson, J., Bjørndal, T., Kumar, G., Lorenzen, K., Ropicki, A., Smith, M. D., & Tveterås, R. (2020). A global blue revolution: Aquaculture growth across regions, species, and countries. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 28(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1678111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gren, I. M., Säll, S., Aklilu, A. Z., & Tirkaso, W. (2018). Does mussel farming promote cost savings and equity in reaching nutrient targets for the Baltic Sea? Water, 10(11), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillen, J., Asche, F., Carvalho, N., Fernández Polanco, J. M., Llorente, I., Nielsen, R., Nielsen, M., & Villasante, S. (2019). Aquaculture subsidies in the European Union: Evolution, impact and future potential for growth. Marine Policy, 104, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., Woodcock, P., Macura, B., & Collins, A. (2015). Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology, 29(6), 1596–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselström, L., & Gröndahl, F. (2021). Payments for nutrient uptake in the blue bioeconomy – when to be careful and when to go for it. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 167, 112321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselström, L., Thomas, J. B., Nordström, J., Cervin, G., Nylund, G. M., Pavia, H., & Gröndahl, F. (2020). Socioeconomic prospects of a seaweed bioeconomy in Sweden. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58389-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELCOM. (2018). State of the Baltic Sea – Second HELCOM holistic assessment 2011-2016. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, 155.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., Gamito, S., Karakassis, I., Pederson, P. & A. Smaal. (2001), Use of hydrodynamic and benthic models for managing environmental impacts of marine aquaculture. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 17(4), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2001.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iho, A., Ribaudo, M., & Hyytiäinen, K. (2015). Water protection in the Baltic Sea and the Chesapeake Bay: Institutions, policies, and efficiency. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 93(1–2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, L. B., Nielsen, M., & Nielsen, R. (2016). Gains of integrating sector-wise pollution regulation: The case of nitrogen in Danish crop production and aquaculture. Ecological Economics, 129, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, F., Hukom, V., Nielsen, R., & Nielsen, M. (2023). An upstream-downstream externality related to water quality: The case of the Porong River in Indonesia. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 27(3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2022.2137263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kause, A., Nousiainen, A., & Koskinen, H. (2022). Improvement in feed efficiency and reduction in nutrient loading from rainbow trout farms: the role of selective breeding. Journal of Animal Science, 100(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. K., Kraemer, G. P., & Yarish, C. (2015). Use of sugar kelp aquaculture in Long Island Sound and the Bronz River Estuary for nutrient extraction. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 531, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotta, J., Futter, M., Kaasik, A., Liversage, K., Rätsep, M., Barboza, F. R., Bergström, L., Bergström, P., Bobsien, I., Díaz, E., Herkül, K., Jonsson, P. R., Korpinen, S., Kraufvelin, P., Krost, P., Lindahl, O., Lindegarth, M., Lyngsgaard, M. M., Mühl, M., … Virtanen, E. (2020). Cleaning up the seas using blue growth initiatives: Mussel farming for eutrophication control in the Baltic Sea. The Science of the Total Environment, 709, 136144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouka, P. J., & Engle, C. (1996). Economic implications of treating effluents from catfish production. Aquacultural Engineering, 15(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8609(95)00021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, O., Hart, R., Hernroth, B., Kollberg, S., Loo, L. O., Olrog, L., Rehnstam-Holm, A. S., Svensson, J., Svensson, S., & Syversen, U. (2005). Improving marine water quality by mussel farming: a profitable solution for Swedish society. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 34(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.2.131
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, O., & Kollberg, S. (2009). Can the EU agri-environmental aid program be extended into the coastal zone to combat eutrophication? Hydrobiologia, 629(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9771-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, J. R., Huddleston, T., Woolley, M., & Fothergill, K. (2003). Best management practice development to minimize environmental impact from large flow-through trout farms. Aquaculture, 226(1–4), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00470-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, N. H., Piscopo, A. N., Balogh, S., Furey, R. P., & Mulvaney, K. K. (2021). When, where, and how to intervene? Tradeoffs between time and costs in coastal nutrient management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(2), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, R., Fang, S., & Fanzo, J. (2023). A global view of aquaculture policy. Food Policy. 116, 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, R. L., Hardy, R. W., Buschmann, A. H., Bush, S. R., Cao, L., Klinger, D. H., Little, D. C., Lubchenco, J., Shumway, S. E., & Troell, M. (2021). A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature, 591(7851), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. (2012). Introducing individual transferable quotas on nitrogen in Danish fresh water aquaculture: Production and profitability gains. Ecological Economics, 75, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R., Andersen, J. L., & Bogetoft, P. (2014). Dynamic reallocation of marketable nitrogen emission permits in Danish freshwater aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics, 29(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1086/677758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R., Asche, F., & Nielsen, M. (2016). Restructuring European freshwater aquaculture from family-owned to large-scale firms – lessons from Danish aquaculture. Aquaculture Research, 47(12), 3852–3866. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Bryen, P. J., & Lee, C.-S. (2003). Management of aquaculture effluents workshop discussion summary. Aquaculture, 226(1–4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00480-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M., & Bricker, S. (2020). Sustainable oyster aquaculture, water quality improvement, and ecosystem service value potential in Maryland Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Shellfish Research, 39(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.039.0208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincinato, R. B., Asche, F., Bleie, H., Skrudland, A., & Stormoen, M. (2021). Factors influencing production loss factors in salmonid farming. Aquaculture, 532, 736034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincinato, R. B., Asche, F., & Roll, K. H. (2021). Escapees in salmon aquaculture: A multi-output approach. Land Economics, 97(2), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.97.2.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., Bricker, S. B., Tedesco, M. A., & Wikfors, G. H. (2014). A role for shellfish aquaculture in coastal nitrogen management. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(5), 2519–2525. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4041336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubino, M. (2023). Policy considerations for marine aquaculture in the United States. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 31(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2022.2083452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidemo-Holm, W., Smith, H. G., & Brady, M. V. (2018). Improving agricultural pollution abatement through result-based payment schemes. Land Use Policy, 77, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C., Ferreira, J. G., Bricker, S. B., DelValls, T. A., Martín-Díaz, M. L., & Yáñez, E. (2011). Site selection for shellfish aquaculture by means of GIS and farm-scale models, with an emphasis on data-poor environments. Aquaculture, 318(3–4), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, D. L. (2000). Commentary: The economics of the adoption of BMPs: the case of mariculture water management. Ecological Economics, 35(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00194-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvia, G., Anderson, J. L., & Cai, D. (1996). A multilevel, multiobjective policy model: The case of marine aquaculture development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talberth, J., Selman, M., Walker, S., & Gray, E. (2015). Pay for performance: Optimizing public investments in agricultural best management practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Ecological Economics, 118, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietenberg, T., & Lewis, L. (2012). Environmental and natural resource economics (9th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Burg, S. W. K., Termeer, E. E. W., Skirtun, M., Poelman, M., Veraart, J. A., & Selnes, T. (2022). Exploring mechanisms to pay for ecosystem services provided by mussels, oysters, and seaweeds. Ecosystem Services, 54, 101407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Schatte Olivier, A., Jones, L., Le Vay, L., Christie, M., Wilson, J., & Malham, S. K. (2020). A global review of the ecosystem serviced provided by bivalve aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. A., Wainger, L. A., Parker, M., & Hollady, T. (2018). The potential for nutrient credit trading or economic incentives to expand Maryland oyster aquaculture. Report prepared with support from Maryland Sea Grant under award NA14OAR4170090 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. https://pensacolaoystercluster.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/SeaGrant_Oyster_Aquaculture_Incentives_Final_Report_TS_718_18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2022). World Bank Country and lending groups – country classification – low-income economies ($1 045 or less), lower-middle income economies ($1 046 to $4 095), upper-middle-income economies ($4 096 to $12 695) high-income economies ($12 696 or more). Retrieved May 5, 2022, from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/studies/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
   Google Scholar
• Wui, Y., & Engle, C. R. (2004). A mixed integer programming analysis of effluent treatment options proposed for pond production of hybrid striped bass, Morone chrysops X M. saxatilis. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 15(1–2), 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1300/J028v15n01_07
   Google Scholar