524
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

CyberGIS design considerations for structured participation in collaborative problem solving

, &
Pages 2146-2159 | Received 30 Apr 2012, Accepted 24 Dec 2012, Published online: 02 Apr 2013

References

  • Aguirre, R. and Nyerges, T., 2011. Geovisual evaluation of public participation in decision making: the grapevine. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 22 (4), 305–321.
  • Atkins, D.E., 2011. Cyberinfrastructure for HPC: high performance collaboration [online]. Available from: http://hubzero.org/resources/404 [Accessed 1 November 2012].
  • Atkins, D.E., 2012. CyberGIS: an enabler and beneficiary of cyber-enabled knowledge communities. In: Paper presented at CyberGIS’12: the first international conference on space, time, and 475 CyberGIS, 6–8 August 2012, NCSA, Champaign, IL. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s7nV_qZnnY& [accessed 11 February 11 2013].
  • Atkins, D.E., et al., 2003. Revolutionizing science and engineering through CyberInfrastructure: report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on CyberInfrastructure [online]. National Science Foundation Office of CyberInfrastructure. Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/reports/atkins.pdf [accessed 11 February 2013].
  • Avraam, M., 2011. Improving designs of online participatory decision support systems. Thesis (PhD). University of Washington.
  • Balram, S. and Dragicevic, S., 2006a. Modeling collaborative GIS processes using soft systems theory, UML and object oriented design. Transactions in GIS, 10 (2), 199–218.
  • Balram, S. and Dragicevic, S., 2006b. Extending objects to model agents: a collaborative group design framework using the agent UML extension. In: S. Balram and S. Dragicevic, eds. Collaborative geographic information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishers, 121–133.
  • Balram, S., Dragicevic, S., and Meredith, T., 2003. Achieving effectiveness in stakeholder participation using the GIS-based collaborative spatial Delphi methodology. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5 (3), 365–394.
  • Bourque, P., et al., 2002. Fundamental principles of software engineering – a journey. Journal of Systems and Software, 62 (1), 59–70.
  • Caron, C., et al., 2008. GIScience journals ranking and evaluation: an international Delphi study. Transactions in GIS, 12 (3), 293–321.
  • Dalkey, N.C., 1967. Delphi [online]. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3704/ [accessed 11 February 2013].
  • Delbecq, A.L. and Van de Ven, A.H., 1971. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7 (4), 466–492.
  • Dragicevic, S. and Balram, S., 2004. A Web GIS collaborative framework to structure and manage distributed planning processes. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6 (2), 133–153.
  • Frawley, W.J., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Matheus, C.J., 1992. Knowledge discovery in databases: an overview. AI Magazine, 13 (3), 57.
  • Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M.F., and Sheth, P., 1995. An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 3 (2):119–153.
  • Jankowski, P. and Nyerges, T.L., 2001. Geographic information systems for group decision making: towards a participatory, geographic information science. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Lago, P.P., et al., 2007. Structuring group decision making in a web-based environment by using the Nominal Group Technique. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 52 (2), 277–295.
  • MacEachren, A.M., et al., 2006. Building a geocollaboratory: supporting Human-Environment Regional Observatory (HERO) collaborative science activities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30 (2), 201–225.
  • Mathes, A., 2004. Folksonomies – cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata [online]. Available from: http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.pdf. [available from author, accessed 11 February 2013].
  • Muller, M.J., and Kuhn, S., 1993. Participatory design. Communications of ACM, 36 (6), 24–28.
  • National Research Council, 1996. Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council, 2005. Decision making for the environment: social and behavioral science research priorities. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • National Research Council, 2009. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. 1st ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Nyerges, T. and Aguirre, R.W., 2011. Public participation in analytic-deliberative decision making: evaluating a large-group online field experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101 (3), 561–586.
  • Nyerges, T. and Jankowski, P., 2001. Geographic information systems for group decision making. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press.
  • Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P., and Drew, C., 2002. Data-gathering strategies for social-behavioural research about participatory geographical information system use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (1), 1–22.
  • Nyerges, T., Ramsey, K., and Wilson, M., 2006. Design considerations for an Internet portal to support public participation in transportation improvement decision making. In: S. Balram and S. Dragicevic, eds. Collaborative geographic information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc., 208–236.
  • Nyerges, T., Wright, D., and Aguirre, R., 2010. Geospatial decision support tools for coastal resource management: vulnerability maps characterizing regional climate variability and change impacts [online]. Final Report, NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program, NOAA Grant Number: NA07OAR4310410. Available from: http://faculty.washington.edu/nyerges/SARP_NA07OAR4310410_final_report_A + B_20100918.pdf [accessed 11 February 2013].
  • Roderick, M.L., Nyerges, T.L., and Avraam, M., in press. CyberGIS implementation considerations for structured participation methods in collaborative problem solving. In: S. Wang and M.F. Goodchild, eds. CyberGIS: fostering a new wave of geospatial discovery and innovation. New York: Springer.
  • Sanders, E.B.N., 2002. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: J. Frascara, ed. Design and the social sciences: making connections. London: Taylor & Francis, 1–8.
  • Simon, H.A., 1979. Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69 (4), 493–513.
  • Spencer, L., 1989. Winning through participation: meeting the challenge of corporate change with the technology of participation. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  • Thomas, J.J. and Cook, K.A., 2005. Illuminating the path: the research and development agenda for visual analytics. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
  • Tseng, K.H., et al., 2006. Using online nominal group technique to implement knowledge transfer. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (4), 335–345.
  • Umpleby, S. and Oyler, A., 2007. A global strategy for human development: the work of the institute of cultural affairs. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24 (6), 645–653.
  • Wang, S., 2010. A CyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (3), 535–557.
  • Wang, S. and Liu, Y. 2009. TeraGrid GIScience Gateway: Bridging cyberinfrastructure and GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (5), 631–656.
  • Wang, S., Wilkins-Diehr, N.R., and Nyerges, T.L., 2012. CyberGIS – toward synergistic advancement of cyberinfrastructure and GIScience: a workshop summary. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 4, 125–148.
  • Wang, S., et al. 2013. CyberGIS software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, in press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.