CyberGIS software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap

References

• Aguirre, R. and Nyerges, T., 2011. Geovisual evaluation of public participation in decision making: the grapevine. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 22 (4), 305–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., 2012. From SpaceStat to CyberGIS: twenty years of spatial data analysis software. International Regional Science Review, 35 (2), 131–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. and McCann, M., 2009. OpenGeoDa, open source software for the exploration and visualization of geospatial data. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. Seattle, Washington, DC: ACM, 550–551.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. and Rey, S.J., 2012. Spatial econometrics in an age of CyberGIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (12): 2211–2226.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., Syabri, I., and Kho, Y., 2006. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis, 38 (1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, D.E., et al., 2003. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, D.E., 2011. Cyberinfrastructure for HPC: high performance collaboration. Available from: http://hubzero.org/resources/404 [01 February 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Basney, J., 2011. CILogin. Available from: http://cilogon.org [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., 2012. Smart cities, big data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39 (2), 191–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough, P.A. and McDonnell, R., 1998. Principles of geographical information systems, second edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, K.C., 2003. Geocomputation’s future at the extremes: high performance computing and nanoclients. Parallel Computing, 29 (10), 1281–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, C.J., Arrowsmith, J.R., and Nandigam, V., 2011. Online access and processing of LiDAR topography data. In: G.R. Keller, and C. Baru, eds. Geoinformatics–cyberinfrastructurefor the solid earth sciences, 251–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2012. ESRIArcGIS [online]. Available from: http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/index.html [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• GISolve. 2012. The GISolvetoolkit [online]. Available from: http://www.gisolve.org [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• GRASS.2012. Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) GIS [online]. Available from: http://grass.osgeo.org/ [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• GeoDa. 2012. GeoDa Center & affiliated software [online]. Available from: http://geodacenter.asu.edu/software [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., et al., 1992. Integrating GIS and spatial data analysis –problems and possibilities. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6 (5), 407–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., Yuan, M., and Cova, T.J., 2007.Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS.International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (3), 239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowicz, K., et al., 2010. Semantic enablement for spatial data infrastructures.Transactions in GIS, 14 (2), 111–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S., et al., 2011. OpenTopography: a services oriented architecture for community access to LiDAR topography. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computing for geospatial research and applications.Washington, DC: ACM, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2010. A MapReduce approach to Gi*(d) spatial statistic.In: Proceedings of the ACMsigspatial international workshop on high performance and distributed geographic information systems (ACMHPDGIS 2010), 2 November 2010, San Jose, CA, USA, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A.M., et al., 2006. Building a geocolloaboratory: supporting human-environment regional observatory (HERO) collaborative science activities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30, 201–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, R.B., and Usery, L.E., eds., 2004. A research agenda for geographic information science.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).2009. Social, behavioral, and economic research in the federal context [online]. Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/prospectus_v10_3_17_09.pdf [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2010. Understanding the changing planet: strategic directions for the geographical sciences [online]. Available from: http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12860 [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T. and Aguirre, R., 2008. Online public participation in transportation decision making. Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research.Montreal, Canada: Digital Government Society of North America, 377–378.
   Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T. and Aguirre, R., 2011. Public participation in analytic-deliberative decision making: evaluating a large-group online field experiment. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 101 (3), 561–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T., Ramsey, K., and Wilson, M., 2006. Design considerations for an internet portal to support public participation in transportation improvement decision making. In: S. Balram, and S. Dragicevic,eds. Collaborative geographic information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing, 208–230.
   Google Scholar
• OpenTopography. 2012. OpenTopography: a portal to high-resolution topography data and tools [online]. Available from: http://www.opentopography.org/ [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• pd-GRASS. 2012. pd-GRASS: parallel Display for GRASSGIS [online]. Available from: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/gist/software/grass/ [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Z.R. and Tsou, M.H., 2003. Internet GIS: distributed geographic information services for the internet and wireless networks. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• PGIST. 2012. Participatory geographic information systems for transportation – building tools for better decisions [online]. Available from: http://www.pgist.org [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Railsback, S.F., Lytinen, S.L., and Jackson, S.K., 2006. Agent-based simulation platforms: review and development recommendations. Simulation, 82 (9), 609–623.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, S., et al., 2013. Parallel optimal chorophleth mapping classification in PySAL. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2012.752094.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, S.J. and Anselin, L., 2007. PySAL: a Python library of spatial analytical methods. Review of Regional Studies, 37 (1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, M., et al., 2009.Interoperation of world-wide production e-Science infrastructures.Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 21 (8), 961–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokine, A., 2007. Implementation of a parallel high-performance visualization technique in GRASS GIS.Computers and Geosciences, 33 (5), 685–695.
   Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S. and Bocher, E., 2009. An overview on current free and open source desktop GIS developments.International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (10), 1345–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S. and Hunter, A., 2013. The 2012 free and open source GIS software map – a guide to facilitate research, development and adoption. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C.A., Almes, G.T., and Wheeler, B.C., 2010. Cyberinfrastructure software sustainability and reusability: preliminary report from an NSF-sponsored workshop, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. Available at http://cisoftwaresustainability.iu-pti.org/sites/cisoftwaresustainability.iu-pti.org/files/ci_workshop_preprint.pdf [01 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Tang, W., et al., 2011.Agent-based modeling within a cyberinfrastructure environment: a service-oriented computing approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (9), 1323–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, W. and Wang, S., 2009. HPABM: a hierarchical parallel simulation framework for spatially explicit agent-based models. Transactions in GIS, 13 (3), 315–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., et al., 2005. GISolve: a grid-based problem solving environment for computationally intensive geographic information analysis. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposiumon high performance distributed computing (HPDC-14) – challenges of large applications in distributed environments (CLADE) Workshop. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., 2008. Formalizing computational intensity of spatial analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on geographic information science, 23–26 September 2008, Park City, Utah, USA, 184–187.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., 2010.A CyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (3), 535–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. and Armstrong, M.P., 2009. A theoretical approach to the use of cyberinfrastructure in geographical analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (2), 169–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Armstrong, M.P., and Bennett, D.A., 2002. Conceptual basics of middleware design to support Grid computing of geographic information. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on geographic information science, 25–28 September 2002, Boulder, CO, USA, 197–200.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. and Liu, Y., 2009. TeraGrid GIScience gateway: bridging cyberinfrastructure and GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (5), 631–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Wilkins-Diehr, N., and Nyerges, T., 2012.CyberGIS – toward synergistic advancement of cyberinfrastructure and GIScience: a workshop summary. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 4, 125–148.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. and Zhu, X.-G., 2008. Coupling cyberinfrastructure and geographic information systems to empower ecological and environmental research.BioScience, 58 (2), 94–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.P. and Fotheringham, A.S., 2007. The handbook of geographic information science.Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Worboys, M. and Duckham, M., 2004. GIS: a computing perspective, second edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D.J. and Wang, S., 2011. The emergence of spatial cyberinfrastructure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (14), 5488–5491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J., et al., 2007. Parallelizing MCMC for Bayesian spatiotemporal geostatistical models.Statistics and Computing, 17 (4), 323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., et al., 2010.Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: past, present and future. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems, 34 (4), 264–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Padmanabhan, A., and Wang, S., 2013. A parallel computing approach to viewshed analysis of large terrain data using graphics processing units. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 27 (2): 363–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar