Comparative performance of logistic regression and survival analysis for detecting spatial predictors of land-use change

References

• Agarwal, C., et al., 2002. A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice. USA: Forest Service. Northeastern Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P., 2001. Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• An, L. and Brown, D., 2008. Survival analysis in land change science: integrating with giscience to address temporal complexities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98, 323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, L., et al., 2005. What statistical models help to detect land-change mechanisms? GeoComputation 2005, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• An, L., et al., 2011. Variations in development of exurban residential landscapes: timing, location, and driving forces. Journal of Land Use Science, 6, 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P.K. and Keiding, N., 2002. Multi-state models for event history analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, 91–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angel, S., et al., 2005. The dynamics of global urban expansion. Transport and Urban Development Department, The World Bank, Washington D.C., 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D., 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer, 14, 73–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall, R., 2004. Modelling land use change with generalized linear models–a multi-model analysis of change between 1860 and 2000 in Gallatin Valley, Montana. Journal of Environmental Management, 72, 91–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briassoulis, H., 2000. Analysis of land use change: theoretical and modeling approaches. Available from: http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/Briassoulis/contents.htm [21 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D., et al., 2005. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A., et al., 2006. The design of simulation studies in medical statistics. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 4279–4292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. and Masser, I., 2003. Urban growth pattern modeling: a case study of Wuhan city, PR China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K.C., et al., 2007. A decade of SLEUTHing: lessons learned from applications of a cellular automaton land use change model. In: P. Fisher, ed. Classics in IJGIS: Twenty Years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Science and Systems, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Coomes, O., Grimard, F., and Burt, G., 2000. Tropical forests and shifting cultivation: secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 32, 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D.R., 1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Methodological, 34, 187–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D.R. and Oakes, D., 1984. Analysis of survival data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, J.S., 1999. Predictive performance of the binary logit model in unbalanced samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 48, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Epperson, B., et al., 2010. Utility of computer simulations in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3549–3564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D., MacKenzie, D., and Villouta, E., 2005. Modelling skewed data with many zeros: a simple approach combining ordinary and logistic regression. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 12, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, T., et al., 2003. A simulation study of the model evaluation criterion MMRE. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 29, 985–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geist, H. and Lambin, E., 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience, 52, 143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geist, H. and Lambin, E., 2004. Dynamic causal patterns of desertification. Bioscience, 54, 817–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K., Kempka, D., and Lackey, L., 1994. Using remote sensing to detect and monitor land-cover and land-use change. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, 331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M.S. and Symons, M.J., 1983. A comparison of the logistic risk function and the proportional hazards model in prospective epidemiologic studies. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 36, 715–723.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrell, F., 2001. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, G. and Schemper, M., 2002. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2409–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A.M. and Bürgi, M., 2009. Going beyond landscape change description: quantifying the importance of driving forces of landscape change in a Central Europe case study. Land Use Policy, 26, 640–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzel, A., Helfer, V., and Metral, F., 2001. Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecological Modelling, 145, 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P.W., 1986. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Q., Cai, Y., and Peng, J., 2007. Modeling the spatial pattern of farmland using GIS and multiple logistic regression: a case study of Maotiao River Basin, Guizhou Province, China. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 12, 55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Zhang, L., and Wu, B., 2009. Spatiotemporal analysis of rural–urban land conversion. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23, 379–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iovanna, R. and Vance, C., 2007. Modeling of continuous-time land cover change using satellite imagery: an application from North Carolina. Journal of Land Use Science, 2, 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, E. and Bockstael, N., 2004. Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34, 705–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, E.G. and Geoghegan, J., 2001. Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85, 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. and Zeng, L., 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. and Moeschberger, M., 1997. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lambin, E., 1997. Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Progress in Physical Geography, 21, 375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E.F. and Geist, H., 2006. Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.T. and Wang, J.W., 2003. Statistical methods for survival data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ligmann-Zielinska, A., 2009. The impact of risk-taking attitudes on a land use pattern: an agent-based model of residential development. Journal of Land Use Science, 4,215–232.
   Google Scholar
• Ligmann-Zielinska, A. and Sun, L., 2010. Applying time dependent variance-based global sensitivity analysis to represent the dynamics of an agent-based model of land use change. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24, 1829–1850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverman, D.M., 1998. People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• López, S. and Sierra, R., 2010. Agricultural change in the Pastaza River Basin: a spatially explicit model of native Amazonian cultivation. Applied Geography, 30, 355–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunetta, R.S., et al., 2006. Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 105, 142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J. and Wei, Y.H., 2009. Modeling spatial variations of urban growth patterns in Chinese cities: the case of Nanjing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91 (2), 51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malanson, J., 2005. Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, 745–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, S.M., 2006. Bounded rationality in agent-based models: experiments with evolutionary programs. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20, 991–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, B. and Lambin, E., 2000. Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudholkar, G.S., Srivastava, D.K., and Freimer, M., 1995. The exponentiated Weibull family: a reanalysis of the bus-motor-failure data. Technometrics, 37, 436–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel, M.C., McGarigal, K., and Cushman, S.A., 2004. Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landscape Ecology, 19, 435–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overmars, K. and Verburg, P., 2005. Analysis of land use drivers at the watershed and household level: linking two paradigms at the Philippine forest fringe. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, 125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D., et al., 2003. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 314–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R., et al., 2008. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. The Annals of Regional Science, 42, 11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, R.R., et al., 2007. Frontier land use change: synthesis, challenges, and next steps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97, 739–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, R.R., et al., 2008. Land use change: complexity and comparisons. Journal of Land Use Science, 3, 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serneels, S. and Lambin, E.F., 2001. Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85, 65–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuster, J.J., 1992. Practical handbook of sample size guidelines for clinical trials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J.D. and Willett, J.B., 2003. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K.R. and Zick, C.D., 1994. Linked lives, dependent demise? Survival analysis of husbands and wives. Demography, 31, 81–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., and O’neill, R.V., 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B.L., Lambin, E.F., and Reenberg, A., 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M.G., Wear, D.N., and Flamm, R.O., 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological applications, 6, 1150–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagen, T.G., 2006. Remote sensing of complex land use change trajectories–a case study from the highlands of Madagascar. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 115, 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R., 2004. Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: the case of tropical deforestation. International Regional Science Review, 27, 247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. and Yeh, A.G.O., 1997. Changing spatial distribution and determinants of land development in Chinese cities in the transition from a centrally planned economy to a socialist market economy: a case study of Guangzhou. Urban Studies, 34, 1851–1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyman, M. and Stein, T., 2010. Modeling social and land-use/land-cover change data to assess drivers of smallholder deforestation in Belize. Applied Geography, 30, 329–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashin, A.I., Vaupel, J.W., and Iachine, I.A., 1995. Correlated individual frailty: an advantageous approach to survival analysis of bivariate data. Mathematical Population Studies, 5, 145–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Li, B., and Kurban, A., 2008. Trajectory analysis of land cover change in arid environment of China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 1093–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar