Automatic drainage pattern recognition in river networks

References

• Ai, T., Liu, Y., and Huang, Y., 2007.The hierarchical watershed partitioning and generalization of river network. Acta Geodaetica Et Cartographica Sinica, 36 (2), 231–243.
   Google Scholar
• Binks, P.J. and Hooper, G.J., 1984. Uranium in tertiary palaeochannels, ‘West coast area’, South Australia.Proceedings Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 289, 271–275.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, J.A. and Murty, U.S.R., 2008. Graph Theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buttenfield, B.P., Stanislawski, L.V., and Brewer, C.A., 2010. Multiscale representations of water: tailoring generalization sequences to specific physiographic regimes. Proceedings of GIScience 2010, 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, R., 2008. Fundamentals of Fluvial Geomorphology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., et al., 2007. Detection of spatial conflicts between rivers and contours in digital map updating. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (10), 1093–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit, M.C.J., 1999. Post-Gondwana drainage and the development of diamond placers in western South Africa. Economic Geology, 94, 721–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florinsky, I. V., 2009. Computation of the third-order partial derivatives from a digital elevation model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (2), 213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst, J. and Hörhan, T., 2009. Coding of watershed and river hierarchy to support GIS-based hydrological analyses at different scales. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (3), 688–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleyzer, A., Denisyuk, M., Rimmer, A. and Salingar, Y., 2004. A fast recursive GIS algorithm for computing Strahler stream order in braided and non braided networks. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40 (4), 937–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D. and Harding, J.S., 2007. Braided river ecology: a literature review of physical habitats and aquatic invertebrate communities. Science for Conservation 279. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2007. A physically-based method for removing pits in digital elevation models. Advances in Water Resources, 30 (10), 2151–2158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, E.S., 1963.Elements of Structural Geology. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A.D., 1967. Drainage analysis in geologic interpretation: a summation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 51, 2246–2259.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Qi, Q., and Zhang, A., 2009. How to decide the units of drainage pattern of generalisation. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2009 IEEE International, IGARSS 2009. 2, 658–661.
   Google Scholar
• Knighton, A.D., 1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., 1998. The field guide to geology. New York: Checkmark Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, L. B., and Wolman, M.G., 1957. River Channel Patterns: Braided, Meandering and Straight.Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, J. Brewer, P.A., 2001. Predicting channel patterns. Geomorphology, 40 (3–4), 329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., Wang, G., and Chen, J., 2010. A modified binary tree codification of drainage networks to support complex hydrological models. Computers & Geosciences, 36 (11), 1427–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z.L., 2007. Algorithmic Foundation of Multi-Scale Spatial Representation. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., 1984. Automated detection of drainage network from digital elevation model. Cartographica, 21 (3), 168–178.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, F., Grimaldi, S., Santini, M., Petroselli, A.and Ubertini, L., 2008. Hydrogeomorphic properties of simulated drainage patterns using digital elevation models: the flat area issue. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (6), 1176–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, L. and Rueda, A., 2010. Parallel drainage network computation on CUDA. Computers & Geosciences, 36 (2), 171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva, J.and Egenhofer, M. J., 2000. Robust inference of the flow direction in river networks. Algorithmica, 26 (2), 315–333.
   Google Scholar
• Pidwirny, M., 2006. The Drainage Basin Concept. Fundamentals of Physical Geography, 2nd Edition. Available from: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10aa.html [ Accessed 22 Dec. 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, M.E., 2003. The Physical Environment: An Introduction to Physical Geography. Available from: http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/geog101/textbook/title_page.html [ Accessed 22 Dec. 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Rusak, M.E. and Caster, H.W., 1990. Horton ordering scheme and the generalisation of river networks. Cartographic Journal, 27 (2), 104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm, S.A. and Khan, H.R., 1972. Experimental study of channel patterns. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 35, 1755–1770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm, S.A., 1977. The Fluvial System. New York: J. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, S.A., Dumont, J.F., and Holbrook, J.M., 2000. Active Tectonics and Alluvial Rivers. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, B. and Roy, A. G., 1990. Flow direction and branching geometry at junctions in dendritic river networks. The Professional Geographer, 42 (2), 194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreve, R.L., 1966. Statistical low of stream numbers. Journal of Geology, 74, 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D.F. and Gerald, C.N., 2004. The morphology and formation of floodplain-surface channels, Cooper Creek, Australia. Geomorphology, 60, 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislawski, L.V., 2009. Feature pruning by upstream drainage area to support automated generalization of the United Stated National Hydrography Dataset. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (3), 325–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislawski, L.V. and Buttenfield, B.P., 2011. Hydrographic generalization tailored to dry mountainous regions. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38 (2), 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 8 (6), 913–920.
   Google Scholar
• Tarboton, D.G., 1997. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 33 (2), 309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarboton, D.G., Bras, R.L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 1991. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes, 5 (1), 81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarjan, R.E., 1974. A note on finding the bridges of a graph. Information Processing Letters, 2, 160–161.
   Google Scholar
• Touya, G., 2007. River network selection based on structure and pattern recognition. Proceedings of the 23rd International Cartographic Conference, 4–9 August 2007, Moscow, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Twidale, C.R., 2004. River patterns and their meaning. Earth-Science Reviews, 67 (3–4), 159–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdin, K. L. and Verdin, J. P., 1999. A topological system for delineation and codification of the Earth’s river basins. Journal of Hydrology, 218 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, J. V., Colombo, R., and Bertolo, F., 2003. Deriving drainage networks and catchment boundaries: a new methodology combining digital elevation data and environmental characteristics. Geomorphology, 53 (3–4), 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8 (3), 338–353.
   Google Scholar