Enhanced multi-objective optimization algorithm for renewable energy sources: optimal spatial development of wind farms

References

• Baker, J.E., 1985. Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of an international conference on genetic algorithms and their applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, C.J., 2001. A genetic algorithm for designing optimal patch configurations in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15 (6), 539–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, K., et al., 2011. Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: extensions to the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (12), 1949–1969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, D. and Deb, K., 2007. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for land-use management problem. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 3 (4), 371–384.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., 2000. An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 18 (2/4), 311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., et al., 2000. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In Proceedings of the Parallel Solving from Nature VI (PPSN-VI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 849–858.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., 2001a. Nonlinear goal programming using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52 (3), 291–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., 2001b. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, A.R., et al., 2010. Internal cohesion and geometric shape of spatial clusters. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 17, 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C.M. and Fleming, P.J., 1995. An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation Journal, 3 (1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C.M. and Fleming, P.J., 1998a. Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms – Part I: a unified formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 28 (1), 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C.M. and Fleming, P.J., 1998b. Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms – Part II: application example. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 28 (1), 38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gen, M. and Cheng, R., 1997. Genetic algorithms and engineering design. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic algorithms for search, optimization and machine learning. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D.E. and Deb, K., 1991. A comparison of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 1 (FOGA-1), Bloomington Campus, Indiana, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 69–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hajela, P. and Lin, C.-Y., 1993. Genetic algorithms in structural topology optimization. In Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on topology design of structures. Portugal: Kluwer, 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J.H., 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J., Nafpliotis, N., and Goldberg, D., 1994. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization. In Proceedings of the first IEEE conference on evolutionary computation, 82–87. Orlando, FL: IEEE Neural Networks Council.
   Google Scholar
• Kursawe, F., 1990. A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature I (PPSN-I), 193–197. Dortmund, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Church, R.L., and Jankowski, P., 2005. Sustainable urban land use allocation with spatial optimization. In: Conference proceedings – the 8th international conference on geocomputation, August 1–3, 2005, University of Michigan, Eastern Michigan University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lücken, C., Barán, B., and Sotelo, A., 2004. Pump scheduling optimization using asyncrononous parallel evolutionary algorithms. Clei Electronic Journal, 2 (7), Paper 2.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K.B., et al., 1999. Applying genetic algorithms to land use planning. Conference proceedings – 18th annual conference of the BCS planning and scheduling special interest group. Salford, UK: BCS Planning and Scheduling SIG, 1368–5708.
   Google Scholar
• Mezura-Montes, E. and Coello, C.A.C., 2003. Multiobjective-based concepts to handle constraints in evolutionary algorithms. In: E. Chavez, et al., eds. Proceedings of the fourth Mexican international conference on computer science (ENC’ 2003). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 192–199.
   Google Scholar
• Michalewicz, Z., 1992. Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., 1996. Introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, J.D., 1985. Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms, genetic algorithms and their applications. In Proceedings of the first international conference on genetic algorithms. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, W.M., 1998. The role of mutation and recombination in evolutionary algorithms. Thesis (PhD). George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, N. and Deb, K., 1994. Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computational Journal, 2 (3), 221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, D. and Murray, A.T., 2012. Spatial optimization in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (6), 1290–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vose, M.D., 1999. Simple genetic algorithm: foundation and theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar