Analyzing the commercial activities of a street network by ranking their nodes: a case study in Murcia, Spain

References

• Agryzkov, T., et al., 2012. An algorithm for ranking the nodes of an urban network based on concept of PageRank vector. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, 2186–2193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, R. and Barabasi, A.L., 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27 (2), 93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, F. and Krishnamachari, B., 2009. Spatio-temporal variations of vehicle traffic in vanets: facts and implementations. Proceedings of the sixth ACM international workshop on Vehicular Internet working VANET, 36 (3), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhin, P., 2005. A survey on PageRank computing. Internet Mathematics, 2 (1), 73–120.
   Google Scholar
• Buhl J., et al., 2006. Topological patterns in street networks of self-organized urban settlements. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 49, 513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, F., et al., 2011. Real-time urban monitoring using cell phones: a case study in Rome. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12, 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardillo A., et al., 2006. Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns. Physical Review, E73, 066107.
   Google Scholar
• Crucitti P., Latora V. and Porta S., 2006. The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach. Planning and Design, 33 (5), 705–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C., 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40 (1), 35–41. 
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C., 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1 (3), 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastner, M.T. and Newman, M., 2006. The spatial structure of networks. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 49 (2), 247–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, M., Hidalgo, C.A., and Barabasi, A., 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature, 453 (7196), 779–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. and Yellen, J., 1999. Graph theory and lists application. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haining, L., 2003. Spatial data analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, S.K. and Ban, Y.U., 2011. Computational algorithms to evaluate design solutions using Space Syntax. Computer-Aided Design, 43 (6), 664–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., 2009. Ranking spaces for predicting human movement in an urban environment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (7), 823–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B. and Jia, T., 2011. Agent-based simulation of human movement shaped by the underlying street structure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (1), 51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., Zaho, S., and Yin, J., 2008. Self-organized natural roads for predicting traffic flow: a sensitive study. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, arXiv:0804.1630v3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayvan, K., 2012. A configurational approach to analytical urban design: space syntax methodology. Urban Design International, 17, 297–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings, G., et al., 2010. Scaling behaviors in the communications network between cities. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, 4, 936–939.
   Google Scholar
• Kurant, M. and Thiran, P., 2006. Layered complex network. Physical Review Letters, 96 (13), 138701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langville, A.N. and Mayer, C.D., 2005. Deeper inside PageRank. Internet Mathematics, 1 (3), 335–380.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J. and Shaw, S., 2001. Geographic information systems for transportation: principles and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okabe, A., Satoh, T., and Sugihara, K., 2009. A kernel density estimation method for networks, its computational method and a GIS-based tool. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (1), 7–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe, A. and Sugihara, K., 2012. Spatial analysis along networks: statistical and computational methods. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Page, L., et al., 1999. The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project. 
   Google Scholar
• Peponis J., et al., 2007. Street connectivity and urban density. Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium, 4, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Porta, S., et al., 2009. Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna, Italy. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36 (3), 450–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, D., Corcoran, J., and Cheetri, P., 2010. Spatial forecasting of residential urban fires: a Bayesian approach. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 34 (6), 58–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nes A. and ZhaoHui, S., 2009. Network typology, junction typology and spatial configuration and their impacts on street vitality in Singapore. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, 124, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, W.J. and Kan, X.D., 2012. Coordination analysis for urban underground space and rail transit based on space syntax. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 170–173, 1388–1391.
   Google Scholar