Porting of a wildfire risk and fire spread application into a cloud computing environment

References

• Albini, F.A., et al., 1995. Calibration of a large fuel burnout model. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 5 (3), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, P.L., 1986. BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system – BURN subsystem, Part 1. General Technical Report INT-194. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 133 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, M.A., Shah, R.M., and Ahmad, B., 2011. Cloud computing: a solution to information support systems (ISS). International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 3 (2), 594–600.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, D., Wu, Y., and Zhang, Q., 2010. Massive spatial data processing model based on cloud computing model. In: Third International Joint Conference on Computational Science and Optimization (CSO), 28–31 May 2010, Huangshan, Anhu, 347–350.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012. Forest fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2011. Joint report of JRC and Directorate-General Environment (EUR 25483 EN). Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, M.A., 2004. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator–model development and evaluation. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 47 p.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, M.A., 2006. An overview of FlamMap modeling capabilities. In: Fuels management—how to measure success: conference proceedings, 28–30 March 2006. Portland, Oregon. Proceedings RMRS-P-41. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kalabokidis, K., et al., 2012. Decision support system for forest fire protection in the Euro-Mediterranean region. European Journal of Forest Research, 131 (3), 597–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalabokidis, K., et al., 2013. Virtual fire: a web-based GIS platform for forest fire control. Ecological Informatics, 16, 62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallos, G., et al., 1997. The regional weather forecasting system SKIRON: an overview. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on regional weather prediction on parallel computer environments, 15–17 October 1997, Athens, Greece, 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lezzi, D., et al., 2011. Enabling e-science applications on the cloud with COMPSs. In: M. Alexander, et al., eds. Euro-Par 2011: parallel processing workshops. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mell, P. and Grance, T., 2011. The NIST definition of cloud computing [online]. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-145. Available from: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf [Accessed 15 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.M., 2000. Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30 (7), 1071–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaiologou, P., Kalabokidis, K., and Kyriakidis, P., 2013. Forest mapping by geoinformatics for landscape fire behaviour modelling in coastal forests, Greece. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34 (12), 4466–4490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pausas, J.G., et al., 2008. Are wildfires a disaster in the Mediterranean basin? – A review. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 17 (6), 713–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S.H., et al., 2009. Using HFire for spatial modeling of fire in shrublands. Research Paper PSW-RP-259. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 44 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rothermel, R.C., 1972. A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Research Paper INT-115. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 40 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rothermel, R.C., 1991. Predicting behavior and size of crown fires in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Research Paper INT-438. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 46 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sadashiv, N. and Kumar, S.M.D., 2011. Cluster, grid and cloud computing: a detailed comparison. In: 6th international conference on computer science and education (ICCSE), 3–5 August 2011, SuperStarVirgo, Singapore, 477–482.
   Google Scholar
• Simmhan, Y., et al., 2010. Bridging the gap between desktop and the cloud for eScience applications. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 3rd international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD), 5–10 July 2010, Miami, FL: IEEE Computer Society, 474–481.
   Google Scholar
• Singhvi, B., 2012. Cloud computing and GIS: features and applications (Final Seminar Report) [online]. Bombay: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology. Available from: http://www.gise.cse.iitb.ac.in/wiki/images/6/6b/10305912_CS694.pdf [Accessed 24 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, J., et al., 2011. Geoportal – a spatial cloud information service. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3 (11), 7930–7933.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.W. and Alexander, M.E., 2006. Science, technology and human factors in fire danger rating: the Canadian experience. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 15 (1), 121–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wagner, C.E., 1977. Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 7 (1), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, R., et al., 2012. Cloud computing for research and science: a holistic overview, policy, and recommendations [online]. International Collaboration on Research Data Infrastructure. Available from: https://www.icordi.eu/Content/NewsRoom.aspx?id=74&Page=1&Cat=0!3!2 [Accessed 24 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Vasilakos, C., et al., 2007. Integrating new methods and tools in fire danger rating. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 16 (3), 306–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilakos, C., et al., 2009. Identifying wildland fire ignition factors through sensitivity analysis of a neural network. Natural Hazards, 50 (1), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VENUS-C, 2012a. Deliverable D3.10: future sustainability strategies – final [online]. VENUS-C Framework Programme 7 (2007–2013), Research infrastructures projects. Available from: http://www.venus-c.eu/deliverables_year2/VENUS-C_D3.10.pdf [Accessed 24 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• VENUS-C, 2012b. Deliverable D6.4: programming models – prototypes [online]. VENUS-C Framework Programme 7 (2007–2013), Research infrastructures projects. Available from: http://www.venus-c.eu/deliverables_year2/VENUS-C_D3.10.pdf [Accessed 24 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Viegas, D.X., et al., 1999. Comparative study of various methods of fire danger evaluation in Southern Europe. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 9 (4), 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., et al., 2011. Spatial cloud computing: how geospatial sciences could use and help to shape cloud computing. International Journal of Digital Earth, 4 (4), 305–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar