A local scale-sensitive indicator of spatial autocorrelation for assessing high- and low-value clusters in multiscale datasets

References

• Aldstadt, J. and Getis, A., 2006. Using AMOEBA to create a spatial weights matrix and identify spatial clusters. Geographical Analysis, 38, 327–343. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2006.00689.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T.F.H. and Hoekstra, T.W., 1992. Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., 1989. What is special about spatial data? Alternative perspectives on spatial data analysis. Technical Report. National Centre for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27 (2), 93–115. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., and Jordan, M.I., 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boots, B., 2003. Developing local measures of spatial association for categorical data. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5, 139–160. doi:10.1007/s10109-003-0110-3
   Google Scholar
• Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A.S., and Charlton, M., 1996. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial non-stationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28 (4), 281–298. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cangelosi, R. and Goriely, A., 2007. Component retention in principal component analysis with application to cDNA microarray data. Biology Direct, 2 (2). doi:10.1186/1745-6150-2-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, T.F., Golub, G.H., and Randall, J.L., 1983. Algorithms for computing the sample variance: analysis and recommendations. The American Statistician, 37 (3), 242–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, A.D., and Ord., J.K., 1969. The problem of spatial autocorrelation. In: A.J. Scott, ed. London papers in regional science (1), studies in regional science. London: Pion, 25–55.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, A., et al., 2013. Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17 (1), 124–147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacey, M.F., 1965. A review on measures of contiguity for two and k-color maps. Technical Report No. 2, Spatial Diffusion Study. Department of Geography, Northwestern University, Evanston.
   Google Scholar
• Deerwester, S., et al., 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 391–407. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dungan, J.L., et al., 2002. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography, 25, 626–640. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A.S., 2009. “The problem of spatial autocorrelation” and local spatial statistics. Geographical Analysis, 41, 398–403. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00767.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, R.C., 1954. The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, 5 (3), 115–146. doi:10.2307/2986645
   Google Scholar
• Getis, A., 2006. Spatial statistics. In: P.A. Longley, et al., eds. Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, 239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Getis, A., 2009. Spatial weights matrices. Geographical Analysis, 41, 404–410. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00768.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getis, A., 2010. Spatial autocorrelation. In: M. Fischer and A. Getis, eds. Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Berlin: Springer, 255–278.
   Google Scholar
• Getis, A. and Aldstadt, J., 2004. Constructing the spatial weights matrix using a local statistic. Geographical Analysis, 36 (2), 90–104. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2004.tb01127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getis, A. and Ord, J.K., 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24 (3), 189–206. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C.C., Ostrom, E., and Ahn, T.K., 2000. The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecological Economics, 32, 217–239. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00092-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M., 2001. Models of scale and scales of modelling. In: N.J. Tate and P.M. Atkinson, eds. Modelling scale in geographical information science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M., 2009. What problem? Spatial autocorrelation and geographic information science. Geographical Analysis, 41, 411–417. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00769.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawelka, B., et al., 2014. Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41 (3), 260–271. doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.890072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, T., 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: F. Gey, M. Hearst, and R. Tong, eds. Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York, NY: ACM, 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, N.S.-N. and Quattrochi, D.A., 1992. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences. The Professional Geographer, 44 (1), 88–98. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1992.00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovici, D.G., et al., 2014. Local and global spatio-temporal entropy indices based on distance-ratios and co-occurrences distributions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (5), 1061–1084. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.871284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J.P., 2003. A family of geographically weighted regression models. In: L. Anselin, J.G.M. Florax, and S.J. Rey, eds. Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Heidelberg: Springer, 241–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C., 2011. Local models for spatial analysis. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, D., Flowerdew, R., and Steel, D., 2006. Scales, levels and processes: studying spatial patterns of British census variables. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30, 143–160. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metke-Jimenez, A., Raymond, K., and MacColl, I., 2011. Information extraction from web services: a comparison of tokenisation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Knowledge (SKY 2011). Paris: SciTePress, 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L., et al., 2013. The geography of happiness: connecting Twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place. PLoS ONE, 8 (5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D.R., 2001. Scale in geography. In: N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes, eds. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioural sciences. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 13501–13504.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, P.A.P., 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37 (1–2), 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T.A., 2012. Trends in spatial statistics. The Professional Geographer, 64 (1), 83–94. doi:10.1080/00330124.2011.578540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B., Krieger, M., and Ahn, D., 2010. TweetMotif: exploratory search and topic summarization for Twitter. In: M. Hearst (ed.) Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Menlo Park: The AAAI Press, 384–385.
   Google Scholar
• Ord, J.K. and Getis, A., 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis, 27 (4), 286–306. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ord, J.K. and Getis, A., 2001. Testing for local spatial autocorrelation in the presence of global autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science, 41 (3), 411–432.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, A. and Paroubek, P., 2010. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: N. Calzolari and K. Choukri (eds.) Proceedings of the seventh international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’10). Paris: European Language Resources Association, 1320–1326.
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, P.A., 1998. The detection of clusters using a spatial version of the chi-square goodness-of-fit statistic. Geographical Analysis, 31 (1), 130–147. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1999.tb00973.x
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, P.A. and Kedron, P., 2012. Optimal weights for focused tests of clustering using the local Moran statistic. Geographical Analysis, 44, 121–133. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2012.00840.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, M., López, F., and Páez, A., 2010. Testing for spatial association of qualitative data using symbolic dynamics. Journal of Geographical Systems, 12, 281–309. doi:10.1007/s10109-009-0100-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smelser, N.J., 1995. Problematics of sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tango, T., 1995. A class of tests for detecting ‘general’ and ‘focused’ clustering of rare diseases. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 2323–2334. doi:10.1002/sim.4780142105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W.R., 1988. Resolution, resampling, and all that. In: H. Mounsey and R. Tomlinson, eds. Building database for global science. London: Taylor & Francis, 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M.G., Dale, V.H., and Gardner, R.H., 1989. Predicting across scales: theory development and testing. Landscape Ecology, 3 (3–4), 245–252. doi:10.1007/BF00131542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. and Lin, G., 2006. A supplemental indicator of high-value or low-value spatial clustering. Geographical Analysis, 38, 209–225. doi:10.1111/j.0016-7363.2006.00683.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. and Lin, G., 2007. A decomposition of Moran’s I for clustering detection. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 6123–6137. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G.K., 1949. Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar