A citizen data-based approach to predictive mapping of spatial variation of natural phenomena

References

• Ali, A. and Schmid, F., 2014. Data quality assurance for volunteered geographic information. In: M. Duckham et al., eds. Geographic information science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 126–141.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, D., 1994. Research article. Fuzzy set theoretic approaches for handling imprecision in spatial analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8 (3), 271–289. doi:10.1080/02693799408902000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anadón, J.D., et al., 2009. Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive data on animal abundance. Conservation Biology, 23 (3), 617–625. doi:10.1111/cbi.2009.23.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonter, D.N. and Cooper, C.B., 2012. Data validation in citizen science: a case study from Project FeederWatch. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10 (6), 305–307. doi:10.1890/110273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, M.S., et al., 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling, 157 (2–3), 281–300. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, J.E. and Zhu, A.X., 2004. 3dMapper® [online]. Madison, WI: Terrain Analytics LLC. Available from: http://www.terrainanalytics.com [Accessed 14 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• de Solla, S.R., et al., 2005. Effect of sampling effort and species detectability on volunteer based anuran monitoring programs. Biological Conservation, 121 (4), 585–594. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J.L., et al., 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10 (6), 291–297. doi:10.1890/110236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., 2008. Volunteered geographic information: key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice. GeoJournal, 72 (3–4), 133–135. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9187-z
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., Goodchild, M.F., and Sui, D., 2013. Prospects for VGI research and the emerging fourth paradigm. In: D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, eds. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI, 2010. Cost distance algorithm [online]. ArcGIS Desktop 9.3 Help. Available from: http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=Understanding_cost_distance_analysis [Accessed 14 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, M.A., et al., 2009. Locality uncertainty and the differential performance of four common niche-based modeling techniques. Biodiversity Informatics, 6, 36–52. doi:10.17161/bi.v6i1.3314
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. and Metzger, M., 2008. The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72 (3–4), 137–148. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9188-y
   Google Scholar
• Foody, G.M., et al., 2013. Assessing the accuracy of volunteered geographic information arising from multiple contributors to an Internet based collaborative project. Transactions in GIS, 17 (6), 847–860. doi:10.1111/tgis.2013.17.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, J., 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography, 19 (4), 474–499. doi:10.1177/030913339501900403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. and Miller, J.A., 2009. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. and Diaconis, P., 1981. On the histogram as a density estimator: L2 theory. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 57 (4), 453–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T.W., et al., 2008. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Progress in Physical Geography, 32 (2), 203–221. doi:10.1177/0309133308093606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girres, J. and Touya, G., 2010. Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14 (4), 435–459. doi:10.1111/tgis.2010.14.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M., 2007a. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4), 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M., 2007b. Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F. and Glennon, J.A., 2010. Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3 (3), 231–241. doi:10.1080/17538941003759255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F. and Li, L., 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1 (0), 110–120. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C.H., et al., 2004. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19 (9), 497–503. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C.H., et al., 2008. The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45 (1), 239–247. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, W.W., et al., 2012. WorldMap – a geospatial framework for collaborative research. Annals of GIS, 18 (2), 121–134. doi:10.1080/19475683.2012.668559
   Google Scholar
• Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N.E., 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135 (2–3), 147–186. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haining, R.P., 2003. Spatial data analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (4), 682–703. doi:10.1068/b35097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In: D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, eds. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. and Weber, P., 2008. OpenStreetMap: user-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7 (4), 12–18. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2008.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzel, A.H., et al., 2002. Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data?. Ecology, 83 (7), 2027–2036. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2027:ENFAHT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzel, A.H., et al., 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecological Modelling, 199 (2), 142–152. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzel, A.H. and Le, L.G., 2008. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 1372–1381. doi:10.1111/jpe.2008.45.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z.P., 2009. Foraging, reproduction and sleeping site selection of black-and-white snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti) at the southern range. Thesis (MS). Southwest Forestry University, Kunming.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Z.-P., et al., 2012. Seasonality of reproduction of wild black-and-white snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) at Mt. Lasha, Yunnan, China. Primates, 53 (3), 237–245. doi:10.1007/s10329-012-0305-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izenman, A., 1991. Recent developments in nonparametric density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86 (413), 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C.B., et al., 2008. Modelling vague places with knowledge from the web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (10), 1045–1065. doi:10.1080/13658810701850547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadmon, R., Farber, O., and Danin, A., 2004. Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. Ecological Applications, 14 (2), 401–413. doi:10.1890/02-5364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, J.T. and Ostrovsky, M., 2003. From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18 (6), 299–305. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00071-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, N., Wood, J., and Dykes, J., 2010. Analysing uncertainty in home location information in a large volunteered geographic information database. In: Proceedings of the GIS research UK 18th annual conference. London, UK: University College London, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, R.C., 1996. Ecology and behavior of the Yunnan snub-nosed langur (Rhinopithecus bieti, Colobinae). Thesis (PhD). University of California, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer-Schadt, S., et al., 2013. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 19 (11), 1366–1379. doi:10.1111/ddi.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, P.J., Moreira, F., and Osborne, P.E., 2011. Effects of geographical data sampling bias on habitat models of species distributions: a case study with steppe birds in southern Portugal. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (3), 439–454. doi:10.1080/13658816.2010.531020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. and Hilbert, D.W., 2008. LIVES: a new habitat modelling technique for predicting the distribution of species’ occurrences using presence-only data based on limiting factor theory. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17 (13), 3079–3095. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9270-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llobera, M., 2007. Modeling visibility through vegetation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (7), 799–810. doi:10.1080/13658810601169865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Y.C., Kirkpatrick, C.R., and Xiaolin, Z., 1994. Report on the distribution, population, and ecology of the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti). Primates, 35 (2), 241–250. doi:10.1007/BF02382060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moudrý, V. and Šímová, P., 2012. Influence of positional accuracy, sample size and scale on modelling species distributions: a review. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (11), 2083–2095. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.721553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, M.A., et al., 2010. A method for measuring the relative information content of data from different monitoring protocols. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1 (3), 263–273.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N., et al., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403 (6772), 853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, P.E. and Leitão, P.J., 2009. Effects of species and habitat positional errors on the performance and interpretation of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 15 (4), 671–681. doi:10.1111/ddi.2009.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., and Schapire, R.E., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190 (3–4), 231–259. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, S.J., et al., 2007. Predictive mapping of fish species richness across shallow-water seascapes in the Caribbean. Ecological Modelling, 204 (1–2), 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponder, W.F., et al., 2001. Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conservation Biology, 15 (3), 648–657. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003648.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M.D. and Reich, B.J., 2012. Evaluating temporally weighted kernel density methods for predicting the next event location in a series. Annals of GIS, 18 (3), 225–240. doi:10.1080/19475683.2012.691904
   Google Scholar
• Qi, F. and Zhu, A.-X., 2003. Knowledge discovery from soil maps using inductive learning. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17 (8), 771–795. doi:10.1080/13658810310001596049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, S. and Dávalos, L.M., 2003. Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 30 (11), 1719–1727. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00946.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V.B., 2003. A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 7 (1), 3–30. doi:10.1111/tgis.2003.7.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Rüger, N., Schlüter, M., and Matthies, M., 2005. A fuzzy habitat suitability index for populus euphratica in the Northern Amudarya delta (Uzbekistan). Ecological Modelling, 184 (2–4), 313–328. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scull, P., et al., 2003. Predictive soil mapping: a review. Progress in Physical Geography, 27 (2), 171–197. doi:10.1191/0309133303pp366ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeger, C., 2008. The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal, 72 (3–4), 199–213. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9184-2
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, B.W., 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Silvertown, J., 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24 (9), 467–471. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, D., 2008. The wikification of GIS and its consequences: or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32 (1), 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, D., Goodchild, M., and Elwood, S., 2013. Volunteered geographic information, the exaflood, and the growing digital divide. In: D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, eds. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, B.L., et al., 2009. eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142 (10), 2282–2292. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Broekhoven, E., et al., 2006. Fuzzy rule-based macroinvertebrate habitat suitability models for running waters. Ecological Modelling, 198 (1–2), 71–84. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viña, A., et al., 2008. Evaluating MODIS data for mapping wildlife habitat distribution. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (5), 2160–2169. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Robinson, G.J., and White, K., 2000. Generating viewshed without using sightlines. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 66 (1), 87–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, J.R., Guo, Q., and Hijmans, R.J., 2004. The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (8), 745–767. doi:10.1080/13658810412331280211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.P. and Gallant, J.C., 2000. Terrain analysis: principles and applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, W., et al., 2003. Habitat degradation of rhinopithecus bieti in Yunnan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 24 (2), 389–398. doi:10.1023/A:1023009518806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, A.X., 2008. Rule-based mapping. In: J.P. Wilson and A.S. Fotheringham, eds. The handbook of geographic information science. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, A.-X. and Band, L.E., 1994. A knowledge-based approach to data integration for soil mapping. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 20 (4), 408–418. doi:10.1080/07038992.1994.10874583
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, A.X., et al., 2001. Soil mapping using GIS, expert knowledge, and fuzzy logic. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65 (5), 1463–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M., et al., 2010. Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the Haitian Earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2 (2), 6–32. doi:10.2202/1948-4682.1069
   Google Scholar