Fusion of multi-scale DEMs using a regularized super-resolution method

References

• Airbus Defence and Space, 2014. WorldDEM: the new standard of global elevation models [online.] Available from: http://www2.astrium-geo.com/files/pmedia/public/r5434_9_geo_022_worlddem_en_low.pdf [Accessed 22 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bertaccini, D., et al., 2012. An adaptive norm algorithm for image restoration. In: Third international conference, SSVM 2011, Ein-Gedi, Israel. Berlin: Springer, 194–205.
   Google Scholar
• Bulyshev, A., et al., 2011. A super-resolution algorithm for enhancement of FLASH LIDAR data. In: IS&T/SPIE electronic imaging. San Francisco, CA: International Society for Optics and Photonics, 78730F-78730F-78737.
   Google Scholar
• Chaplot, V., et al., 2006. Accuracy of interpolation techniques for the derivation of digital elevation models in relation to landform types and data density. Geomorphology, 77 (1–2), 126–141. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. and Li, Y., 2013. An orthogonal least-square-based method for DEM generalization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (1), 154–167. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.674136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. and Yue, T., 2010. A method of DEM construction and related error analysis. Computers & Geosciences, 36 (6), 717–725. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Wang, C., and Zhang, H., 2009. DEM generation combining SAR polarimetry and Shape-from-Shading techniques. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 6 (1), 28–32. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2008.2002810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., et al., 2013. DEM densification using perspective shape from shading through multispectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10 (1), 145–149. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2012.2195471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darboux, F. and Huang, C.-H., 2003. An instantaneous-profile laser scanner to measure soil surface microtopography. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67 (1), 92–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, S., 2009. A comparison of interpolation methods for producing digital elevation models at the field scale. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34 (3), 366–376. doi:10.1002/esp.v34:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, T.G. and Kobrick, M., 2000. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission produces a wealth of data. EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 81 (48), 583–585.
   Google Scholar
• Farsiu, S., et al., 2004. Fast and robust multiframe super resolution. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13 (10), 1327–1344. doi:10.1109/TIP.2004.834669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, P.F. and Tate, N.J., 2006. Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Progress in Physical Geography, 30 (4), 467–489. doi:10.1191/0309133306pp492ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, P. and Rich, P.M., 2002. A geometric solar radiation model with applications in agriculture and forestry. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37 (1–3), 25–35. doi:10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00115-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant, J., 2011. Adaptive smoothing for noisy DEMs [online]. In: Geomorphometry 2011. Redlands, CA, 7–9. Available from: http://www.geomorphometry.org/ [Accessed 30 May 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Hirano, A., Welch, R., and Lang, H., 2003. Mapping from ASTER stereo image data: DEM validation and accuracy assessment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57 (5–6), 356–370. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00164-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormann, K., Spinello, S., and Schröder, P., 2003. C1-continuous terrain reconstruction from sparse contours. In: VMV. Munich: Aka GmbH, 289–297.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Chen, Y., and Wu, J., 2014. DEM-based modification of pixel-swapping algorithm for enhancing floodplain inundation mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35 (1), 365–381. doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.871084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, M. and Peleg, S., 1991. Improving resolution by image registration. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 53 (3), 231–239. doi:10.1016/1049-9652(91)90045-L
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, A., et al., 2008. Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4 [online]. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Avalaible from: http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org [Accessed 10 July 2007].
   Google Scholar
• Jhee, H., et al., 2013. Multiscale quadtree model fusion with super-resolution for blocky artefact removal. Remote Sensing Letters, 4 (4), 325–334. doi:10.1080/2150704X.2012.729869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., et al., 2014. Fusion of high-resolution DEMs derived from COSMO-SkyMed and TerraSAR-X InSAR datasets. Journal of Geodesy, 88 (6), 587–599. doi:10.1007/s00190-014-0708-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M.V., Chaudhuri, S., and Panuganti, R., 2005. A learning-based method for image super-resolution from zoomed observations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 35 (3), 527–537. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2005.846647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karkee, M., Steward, B.L., and Aziz, S.A., 2008. Improving quality of public domain digital elevation models through data fusion. Biosystems Engineering, 101 (3), 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellndorfer, J., et al., 2004. Vegetation height estimation from shuttle radar topography mission and national elevation datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93 (3), 339–358. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashermes, B., Foufoula‐Georgiou, E., and Dietrich, W.E., 2007. Channel network extraction from high resolution topography using wavelets. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L23S04. doi:10.1029/2007GL031140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.Z. and Singh, S., 2009. Markov random field modeling in image analysis. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., 2008. Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues. Progress in Physical Geography, 32 (1), 31–49. doi:10.1177/0309133308089496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M.K., et al., 2007a. Zoom-based super-resolution reconstruction approach using prior total variation. Optical Engineering, 46 (12), 127003-127003-127011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M.K., et al., 2007b. A total variation regularization based super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for digital video. Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2007, 1–17. doi:10.1155/2007/74585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, R. and Reeves, S.J., 2006. Efficient Huber–Markov edge-preserving image restoration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15 (12), 3728–3735. doi:10.1109/TIP.2006.881971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.C., Park, M.K., and Kang, M.G., 2003. Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 20 (3), 21–36. doi:10.1109/MSP.2003.1203207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passalacqua, P., et al., 2010. A geometric framework for channel network extraction from lidar: Nonlinear diffusion and geodesic paths. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface (2003–2012), 115 (F1). doi:10.1029/2009JF001254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, H.I., Nelson, A., and Jarvis, A., 2007. An evaluation of void‐filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (9), 983–1008. doi:10.1080/13658810601169899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N., Regetz, J., and Guralnick, R.P., 2014. EarthEnv-DEM90: A nearly-global, void-free, multi-scale smoothed, 90m digital elevation model from fused ASTER and SRTM data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87, 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, P. and Wohlberg, B., 2009. Efficient minimization method for a generalized total variation functional. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 18 (2), 322–332. doi:10.1109/TIP.2008.2008420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, D.L., et al., 1998. Topographic mapping using polarimetric SAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19 (1), 141–160. doi:10.1080/014311698216477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H. and Zhang, L., 2009. A MAP-based algorithm for descripting and imprinting of remotely sensed images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47 (5), 1492–1502. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008.2005780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., et al., 2015. Improving the spatial resolution of landsat TM/ETM+ through fusion with SPOT5 images via learning-based super-resolution. IEEE Transactions Ongeoscience and Remote Sensing, 53 (3), 1195–1204. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2014.2335818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachikawa, T., et al., 2011. ASTER global digital elevation model version 2 – summary of validation results [online]. Available from: http://www.jspacesystems.or.jp/library/archives/ersdac/GDEM/ver2Validation/Summary_GDEM2_validation_report_final.pdf [Accessed 31 August 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Y. and Yap, K.-H., 2013. Joint image registration and super-resolution from low-resolution images with zooming motion. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 23 (7), 1224–1234. doi:10.1109/TCSVT.2013.2242593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, R.Y. and Huang, T.S., 1984. Multi-frame image restoration and registration. Advances in Computer Vision and Image Processing, 1 (2), 317–339.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., et al., 2011. Difference analysis of SRTM C-Band DEM and ASTER GDEM for global land cover mapping. In: International symposium on image and data fusion (ISIDF). Tengchong, Yunnan: IEEE, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, S., 2007. Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 11 (4), 1481–1500. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1481-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, L., et al., 2014. A locally adaptive L1−L2 norm for multi-frame super-resolution of images with mixed noise and outliers. Signal Processing, 105, 156–174. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, X. and Yang, L., 2013. A robust multiframe super-resolution algorithm based on half-quadratic estimation with modified BTV regularization. Digital Signal Processing, 23 (1), 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2012.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., et al., 2012. Adjustable model-based fusion method for multispectral and panchromatic images. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 42 (6), 1693–1704. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2198810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2010. Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for deconvolution and sparse reconstruction. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 3 (3), 253–276. doi:10.1137/090746379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2007. Application of Tikhonov regularization to super-resolution reconstruction of brain MRI images. In: 2nd international conference, MIMI 2007. Beijing: Springer-Verlag, 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. and Zhou, Q., 2011. An improved method for POCS superresolution image reconstruction. In: 2011 international conference on electronics, communications and control, ICECC 2011, September 9, 2011–September 11, 2011. Ningbo, China: IEEE Computer Society, 4150–4153.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., et al., 2015. A robust channel network extraction method combining discrete curve evolution and the skeleton construction technique. Advances in Water Resources, 83, 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q. and Liu, X., 2004. Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties. Computers & Geosciences, 30 (4), 369–378. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2003.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q. and Zhu, A.-X., 2013. The recent advancement in digital terrain analysis and modeling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (7), 1269–1271. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.794281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar