Approximation of Gaussian spatial autoregressive models for massive regular square tessellation data

References

• Barry, R. and Pace, R., 1999. Monte Carlo estimates of the log determinant of large sparse matrices. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 289, 41–54. doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(97)10009-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden, S., Cressie, N., and Steel, D., 2015. The SAR model for very large datasets: a reduced rank approach. Econometrics, 3, 317–338. doi:10.3390/econometrics3020317
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N., 1993. Statistics for spatial data. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N., Olsen, A., and Cook, D., 1996. Massive data sets: problems and possibilities, with application to environmental monitoring. In: Committee of Applied and Theoretical Statistics, ed. Massive data sets: proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Dette, H. and Wied, D., 2015. Detecting relevant changes in time series models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rssb.12121/epdf
   Google Scholar
• Good, I., 1982. Standard tail-area probabilities. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 16, 65–75. doi:10.1080/00949658208810607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., 1988. Estimating spatial autoregressive model parameters with commercial statistical packages. Geographical Analysis, 20, 176–186. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., 1992. Simplifying the normalizing factor in spatial autoregressions for irregular lattices. Papers in Regional Science, 71, 71–86. doi:10.1007/BF01538661
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., 2000. Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebra & Its Applications, 321, 95–112. doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(00)00031-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., 2004a. Extreme eigenfunctions of adjacency matrices for planar graphs employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebra & Its Applications, 388, 201–219. doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(03)00368-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., 2005. Effective geographic sample size in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 740–760. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00484.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., 2009. Methods: spatial autocorrelation. In: R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, eds. International encyclopedia of human geography. New York: Elsevier, 396–402.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. and Fellows, P., 1999. Pixels and eigenvectors: classification of LANDSAT TM imagery using spectral and locational information. In: K. Lowell and A. Jaton, eds. Spatial accuracy assessment: land information uncertainty in natural resources. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Press, 309–317.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, G., 2004b. Faster maximum likelihood estimation of very large spatial autoregressive models: an extension of the Smirnov-Anselin result. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 74, 855–866. doi:10.1080/00949650410001650126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamylton, S., 2012. A comparison of spatially explicit and classic regression modelling of live coral cover using hyperspectral remote-sensing data in the Al Wajh lagoon, Red Sea. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 2161–2175. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.683195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., 2009. Quantum estimation and the quantum central limit theorem, In Selected Papers on Probability and Statistics American Mathematical Society Translations Series 2, Vol. 277, pp. 95–123. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquez, G., et al., 2002. Exposure assessment using high spatial resolution hyperspectral (HSRH) imagery. Journal of Geographical Systems, 4, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s101090100070
   Google Scholar
• Kauth, R. and Thomas, G. 1976. The tasseled cap—a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by LANDSAT. In: B. Morrison, P. Swain and D. Parks, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data. New York: IEEE. Purdue University of West Lafayette (Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing), 4B-41–4B-51.
   Google Scholar
• Kelejian, H. and Prucha, I., 1999. A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review, 40, 509–533. doi:10.1111/iere.1999.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kestens, Y., Thériault, M., and Des Rosiers, F., 2006. Heterogeneity in hedonic modelling of house prices: looking at buyers’ household profiles. Journal of Geographical Systems, 8, 61–96. doi:10.1007/s10109-005-0011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lark, R., 2000. Regression analysis with spatially autocorrelated error: simulation studies and application to mapping of soil organic matter. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14, 247–264. doi:10.1080/136588100240831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, D., 2013. Biological importance and statistical significance. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61, 8340–8348. doi:10.1021/jf401124y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, I. and Miller, M., 2004. John E. Freund’s mathematical statistics with applications. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ord, K., 1975. Estimation methods for models of spatial interactions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 120–126. doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10480272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, R. and LeSage, J., 2004. Chebyshev approximation of log-determinants of spatial weight matrices. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 45, 179–196. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00321-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov, O. and Anselin, L., 2001. Fast maximum likelihood estimation of very large spatial autoregressive models: a characteristic polynomial approach. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 35, 301–319. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(00)00018-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov, O. and Anselin, L., 2009. An parallel method of computing the log-Jacobian of the variable transformation for models with spatial interaction on a lattice. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53, 2980–2988. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2008.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walde, J., Larch, M., and Tappeiner, G., 2008. Performance contest between MLE and GMM for huge spatial autoregressive models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 78, 151–166. doi:10.1080/10629360600954109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimberly, M., et al., 2009. Assessing fuel treatment effectiveness using satellite imagery and spatial statistics. Ecological Applications, 19, 1377–1384. doi:10.1890/08-1685.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. and Leithead, W., 2007. Approximate implementation of the logarithm of the matrix determinant in Gaussian process regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 77, 329–348. doi:10.1080/10629360600569279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar