Establishing a framework for Open Geographic Information science

References

• Abowd, J.M. and Lane, J., 2004. New approaches to confidentiality protection: synthetic data, remote access and research data centers. In: J. Domingo-Ferrer and V. Torra, eds. Privacy in statistical databases. Berlin: Springer, 282–289.
   Google Scholar
• Baggerly, K.A. and Coombes, K.R., 2009. Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 3 (4), 1309–1334. doi:10.1214/09-AOAS291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., 2007. Reproducible research in computational economics: guidelines, integrated approaches, and open source software. Computational Economics, 30 (1), 19–40. doi:10.1007/s10614-007-9084-4
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, S., et al. 2013. Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29 (2), 599–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer, J., Schrettl, W., and Schröder, P.J., 2007. Intrinsic motivation in open source software development. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35 (1), 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivand, R., 2014. Spdep: spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models [online]. Available from: CRAN.R-project.org/package=spdep [Accessed: November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bivand, R. and Lewin-Koh, N., 2013. Maptools: tools for reading and handling spatial objects [online]. Available from: CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools [Accessed: November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bivand, R., Pebesma, E.J., and Gmez-Rubio, V., 2008. Applied spatial data analysis with R. New York; London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borgman, C.L., 2012. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (6), 1059–1078. doi:10.1002/asi.v63.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau, U.C., 2014. Expanding the role of synthetic data at the U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Journal of the IAOS: Journal of the International Association for Official Statistics, 30 (2), 117–121.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P., 2009. Climatologists under pressure. Nature, 462 (7273), 545–545. doi:10.1038/462545a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, P., 2010. Closing the climategate. Nature, 468 (7322), 345. doi:10.1038/468345a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, J.L.R., 2014. Spatial data visualisation with R. In: C. Brunsdon and A. Singleton, eds. Geocomputation. London: Sage, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dwork, C., 2008. Differential privacy: a survey of results. In: M. Agrawal, et al., eds. Theory and applications of models of computation. Berlin: Springer, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dwork, C., 2009. The differential privacy frontier. In: O. Reingold, ed. Theory of cryptography. Berlin: Springer, 496–502.
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, L., 1981. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentleman, R. and Temple Lang, D., 2004. Statistical analyses and reproducible research. Bioconductor Project Working Papers., Working Paper 2.
   Google Scholar
• Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A., and Taylor, J., 2010. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biology, 11 (8), 1–13. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. and Janelle, D.G., 2010. Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75, 3–13. doi:10.1007/s10708-010-9340-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4), 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
   Google Scholar
• Herndon, T., Ash, M., and Pollin, R., 2013. Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Technical report 322, Amherst: University of Massachusetts
   Google Scholar
• Jasny, B.R., et al. 2011. Again, and again, and again. Science, 334 (6060), 1225. doi:10.1126/science.334.6060.1225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasny, B.R., 2013. Realities of data sharing using the genome wars as case study - an historical perspective and commentary. EPJ Data Science, 2 (1), 1–15. doi:10.1140/epjds13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R. and Zeileis, A., 2009. On reproducible econometric research. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24 (5), 833–847. doi:10.1002/jae.1083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacevic, J., 2007. How to encourage and publish reproducible research. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing - ICASSP ‘07, 15–20 April, Honolulu, HI, IV–1273–IV–1276.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, S., 2002. Cave or community? An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. First Monday, 7 (6). doi:10.5210/fm.v7i6.960
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M., 2014. odfWeave: Sweave processing of Open Document Format (ODF) files [online]. Available from: CRAN.R-project.org/package=odfWeave [Accessed: November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K. and Wolf, R., 2005. Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leisch, F., 2002. Sweave: dynamic generation of statistical reports using literate data analysis. In: W. Härdle and B. Rönz, eds. Compstat. Berlin: Springer, 575–580.
   Google Scholar
• Leisch, F., Eugster, M., and Hothorn, T., 2011. Executable papers for the R community: the R2 platform for reproducible research. Procedia Computer Science, 4 (0), 618–626. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.065
   Google Scholar
• LeVeque, R., 2009. Python tools for reproducible research on hyperbolic problems. Computing in Science & Engineering, 11 (1), 19–27. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2009.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, P.A., et al., 2010. Geographic information systems and science, Vol. 3. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McMurdie, P.J. and Holmes, S., 2015. Shiny-phyloseq: web application for interactive microbiome analysis with provenance tracking. Bioinformatics, 31 (2), 282–283. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSherry, F. and Talwar, K., 2007. Mechanism design via differential privacy. In: 48th Annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science 2007 (FOCS ‘07), October, Providence, RI, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, O., 2014. Open source GIS software. In: S.A. Brunsdon, ed. Geocomputation. London: Sage, 281–300.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, R.D., Dominici, F., and Zeger, S.L., 2006. Reproducible epidemiologic research. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163 (9), 783–789. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, H., et al., 2015. Bayesian marked point process modeling for generating fully synthetic public use data with point-referenced geography. Spatial Statistics, 14 (Part C), 439–451.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, E., 2001. The cathedral and the bazaar musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Farnham: O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, M., et al., 2006. GenePattern 2.0. Nature Genetics, 38 (5), 500–501. doi:10.1038/ng0506-500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C.M. and Rogoff, K.S., 2010. Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100 (2), 573–578. doi:10.1257/aer.100.2.573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, S., 2009. Show me the code: spatial analysis and open source. Journal of Geographical Systems, 11 (2), 191–207. doi:10.1007/s10109-009-0086-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, S., 2014. Open regional science. The Annals of Regional Science, 52 (3), 825–837. doi:10.1007/s00168-014-0611-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S. and Bocher, E., 2009. An overview on current free and open source desktop GIS developments. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (10), 1345–1370. doi:10.1080/13658810802634956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S. and Hunter, A.J.S., 2012. The 2012 free and open source GIS software map – a guide to facilitate research, development, and adoption. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39, 136–150. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stodden, V., 2010. Data sharing in social science repositories: facilitating reproducible computational research. In: H. Wallach and J. W. Vaughan, eds. Computational social science and the wisdom of crowds, December 10-11, Whistler: BC.
   Google Scholar
• Stodden, V.L, 2014. implementing reproducible research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, T., 2010. Announcing the release of QGIS 1.6 [online]. Available from: blog.qgis.org/node/146 [Accessed: November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Tamber, P., 2000. Is scholarly publishing becoming a monopoly? BMC Editorials, 362 (9395), 1575–1577.
   Google Scholar
• Vandewalle, P., Kovacevic, J., and Vetterli, M., 2009. Reproducible research in signal processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 26 (3), 37–47. doi:10.1109/MSP.2009.932122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., and Lakhani, K.R., 2003. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research Policy, 32 (7), 1217–1241. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00050-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warf, B. and Arias, S., 2009. The spatial turn. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H.-L. and Lai, C.-Y., 2010. Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (6), 1377–1383. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M. and Graham, M., 2007. The creative reconstruction of the Internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38, 1322–1343. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar