Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: challenges and opportunities

References

• Altman, I. and Rogoff, B., 1987. World views in psychology: trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In: D. Stokols and I. Altman, eds. Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley, 7–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bakaev, M., Lee, K.-H., and Cheng, H.-I., 2007. The aesthetic and emotional preferences of the elderly and the design factors for e-business web sites. In: The eight PanPacific conference on occupational ergonomics. Bangkok: Ergonomics Society of Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., 2012. Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal, 25 (2), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., et al., 2014a. An empirical evaluation of workshop versus survey PPGIS methods. Applied Geography, 48, 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Kelly, M., and Whitall, D., 2014b. Which ‘public’? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (2), 190–214. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.741045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Kyttä, M., 2014. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122–136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Reed, P., 2009. Public participation GIS : a new method for use in national forest planning. Forest Science, 55 (2), 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Weber, D., and De Bie, K., 2014c. Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Applied Geography, 53, 77–89. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugs, G., 2012. Assessment of online PPGIS study cases in urban planning. In: B. Murgante, et al., eds. Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2012. Salvador de Bahia, Brazil: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 477–490.
   Google Scholar
• Bugs, G., et al., 2010. An assessment of public participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27 (3), 172–181. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, S., et al., 2001. Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (6), 907–921. doi:10.1068/b2751t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J.W., 2002. Interactivity types in geographic visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29 (2), 85–98. doi:10.1559/152304002782053314
   Google Scholar
• Czaja, S.J. and Lee, C.C., 2007. The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5 (4), 341–349. doi:10.1007/s10209-006-0060-x
   Google Scholar
• Di Gennaro, C. and Dutton, W., 2006. The internet and the public: online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59 (2), 299–313. doi:10.1093/pa/gsl004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finish Ministry of the Environment, 1999. Land Use and Building Act of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. and Tobón, C., 2003. Usability evaluation and PPGIS: towards a user-centred design approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17 (6), 577–592. doi:10.1080/1365881031000114107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausner, V.H., Brown, G., and Lægreid, E., 2015. Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway. Land Use Policy, 49, 446–461. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO-9241-11, 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) — Part 11: Guidance on usability [online]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso: std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en [ Accessed 21 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, R., et al., 2000. Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, 109–125. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00049-6
   Google Scholar
• Kovanen, J., et al., 2012. Simple maps – a concept of plain cartography within a mobile context for elderly users. In: D. Whyatt and B. Rowlingson, eds. 20th GIS Research UK annual conference, GISRUK, Lancaster University, April 11–13, 2012, Lancaster.
   Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., et al., 2013. Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113 (November 2015), 30–46. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laatikainen, T., et al., 2015. Comparing conventional and PPGIS approaches in measuring equality of access to urban aquatic environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 144 (October), 22–33. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Y. and Malczewski, J., 2010. Web-PPGIS usability and public engagement: a case study in Canmore, Alberta, Canada. URISA Journal, 22 (1), 55.
   Google Scholar
• Min, S.-J., 2010. From the digital divide to the democratic divide: internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political internet use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7 (1), 22–35. doi:10.1080/19331680903109402
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, L.W., 2006. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G., et al., 2010. User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (12), 1851–1869. doi:10.1080/13658816.2010.490532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., 2013. Seniors as web users [online]. Nielsen Norman Group Blog Evidence-Based User Experience Research, Training, and Consulting. Available from: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-for-senior-citizens/ [ Accessed 21 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Nivala, A.M., Brewster, S., and Sarjakoski, L.T., 2011. Usability evaluation of web mapping sites. The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation, 45 (2), 379–386.
   Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland (OSF), 2015. Income distribution statistics [online]. Available from: http://www.stat.fi/til/tjt/index_en.html [ Accessed 17 November 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Poplin, A., 2015. How user-friendly are online interactive maps? Survey based on experiments with heterogeneous users. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42 (4), 358–376. doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.991427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righi, V., et al., 2011. Preliminary findings of an ethnographical research on designing accessible geolocated services with older people. In: C. Stepanidis, ed. Universal access in human-computer interaction. User diversity. Orlando, FL: Springer, 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmann, R., Krek, A., and Blaschke, T., 2005. Can online map-based applications improve citizen participation? In: M. Böhlen, et al., eds. E-Government: towards electronic democracy. Bolzano: Springer, 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, S., 2013. The use of e-government services and the internet: the role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors. Telecommunications Policy, 37 (4–5), 413–422. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 1998. Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarus Convention.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J.A.G.M., 2006. Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34 (4–5), 221–235. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrenko, D.Z. and Petrovič, D., 2015. Effective online mapping and map viewer design for the senior population. The Cartographic Journal, 52 (1), 73–87. doi:10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, L.M., Loumakis, A., and Bergman, J., 2003. Who participates and why?: an analysis of citizens on the internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21 (1), 26–42. doi:10.1177/0894439302238969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. and Selwyn, N., 2013. Moving on-line? An analysis of patterns of adult internet use in the UK, 2002-2010. Information, Communication & Society, 16 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.611816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B. and Pearson, G., 2010. Usability testing by older Americans of a prototype google map web site to select nursing homes. In: R.H.J. Sprague, ed. 43nd Hawaii international conference on system science. Honolulu, HI: IEEE Computer Society, 1–10.
   Google Scholar