Predicting the visualization intensity for interactive spatio-temporal visual analytics: a data-driven view-dependent approach

References

• Alder, J.R. and Hostetler, S.W., 2015. Web based visualization of large climate data sets. Environmental Modelling & Software, 68, 175–180. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27 (2), 93–115. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulamis, N., et al., 2007. Adjusted fair scheduling and non-linear workload prediction for QoS guarantees in grid computing. Computer Communications, 30 (3), 499–515. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2005.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulamis, N.D., et al., 2004. A combined fuzzy-neural network model for non-linear prediction of 3-D rendering workload in grid computing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 34 (2), 1235–1247. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2003.822282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frachtenberg, E. and Schwiegelshohn, U., 2007. New challenges of parallel job scheduling. In: 13th International Workshop on Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, 17 June 2007 Seattle, WA. Berlin: Springer, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., Ahrens, J., and Law, C., 2004. The para view guide. Clifton Park, NY: Kitware.
   Google Scholar
• James, G.M. and Sugar, C.A., 2003. Finding the number of clusters in a dataset: an information-theoretic approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98 (463), 750–764. doi:10.1198/016214503000000666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.C., 1967. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32 (3), 241–254. doi:10.1007/BF02289588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokhio, F., et al., 2013. Prediction-based dynamic resource allocation for video transcoding in cloud computing. In: 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP), 27 February–1 March 2013 Belfast, Ireland. IEEE, 254–261.
   Google Scholar
• Keim, D., Qu, H., and Ma, K.-L., 2013. Big-data visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 33 (4), 20–21. doi:10.1109/MCG.2013.54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkhov, V.V., Moscicki, J.T., and Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., 2009. Dynamic workload balancing of parallel applications with user-level scheduling on the grid. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25 (1), 28–34. doi:10.1016/j.future.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousiouris, G., Cucinotta, T., and Varvarigou, T., 2011. The effects of scheduling, workload type and consolidation scenarios on virtual machine performance and their prediction through optimized artificial neural networks. Journal of Systems and Software, 84 (8), 1270–1291. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., et al., 2003. Parallel netCDF: a high-performance scientific I/O interface. In: 2003 ACM/IEEE conference supercomputing, 15–21 November 2003 Phoenix, AZ. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., et al., 2013. Visualizing 3D/4D environmental data using many-core graphics processing units (GPUs) and multi-core central processing units (CPUs). Computers & Geosciences, 59, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maesschalck, R.D., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., and Massart, D.L., 2000. The mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 50 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(99)00047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. 2012. Exploratory climate data visualization and analysis using DV3D and UVCDAT. In: High performance computing, networking, storage and analysis (SCC), 2012 SC companion, 10–16 November 2012 Salt Lake City, UT. IEEE, 483–487.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, T. and Chiueh, T., 1999. Dynamic 3D graphics workload characterization and the architectural implications. In: Proceedings. 32nd Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 16–18 November 1999 Haifa, Isreal.
   Google Scholar
• Mochocki, B.C., et al., 2006. Signature-based workload estimation for mobile 3D graphics. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual design automation conference, 24–28 July 2006 San Francisco, CA. ACM, 592–597.
   Google Scholar
• Nickovic, S., et al., 2001. Model for prediction of desert dust cycle in the atmosphere. Journal Geophysical Research, 106, 18113–18129. doi:10.1029/2000JD900794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salot, P., 2013. A survey of various scheduling algorithm in cloud computing environment. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2 (2), 131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W., Foster, I., and Taylor, V., 2004. Predicting application run times with historical information. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 64 (9), 1007–1016. doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2004.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unidata. 2016. Integrated Data Viewer (IDV) [online]. Available from: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/idv/ [Accessed 2 June 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, P.J., 2013. Making sense of big data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (45), 18031–18032. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317797110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Z., Song, W., and Chen, Q., 2013. Dynamic resource allocation using virtual machines for cloud computing environment. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 24 (6), 1107–1117. doi:10.1109/TPDS.2012.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., et al., 2011. Spatial cloud computing: how can the geospatial sciences use and help shape cloud computing? International Journal of Digital Earth, 4 (4), 305–329. doi:10.1080/17538947.2011.587547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., et al., 2009. Intelligent workload factoring for a hybrid cloud computing model. In: World conference on services-I, 6–10 July 2009 Los Angeles, CA. IEEE, 701–708.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., et al., 2016. A cloud-enabled remote visualization tool for time-varying climate data analytics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75, 513–518. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar