A feature extraction and similarity metric-learning framework for urban model retrieval

References

• Akgul, C.B., et al., 2009. 3D model retrieval using probability density-based shape descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31, 1117–1133. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2009.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexe, B., Deselaers, T., and Ferrari, V., 2010. What is an object?. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 23 (3), 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Arbelaez, P., et. al., 2011. Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33 (5), 898–916. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.161.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D.Y., et al., 2003. On visual similarity based 3D model retrieval. Computer Graphics Forum. 22 (3), 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Ciresan, D., Meier, U., and Schmidhuber, J., 2012. Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012, 3642–3649.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal, N. and Triggs, B., 2005. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, CA, USA, 1, 886–893.
   Google Scholar
• Daras, P. and Axenopoulos, A., 2010. A 3D shape retrieval framework supporting multimodal queries. International Journal of Computer Vision, 89, 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0277-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, I. and Hoiem, D., 2010. Category independent object proposals. In: K. Daniilidis, P. Maragos and N. Paragios, eds. European conference on computer vision. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 575–588.
   Google Scholar
• Farabet, C., et al., 2013. Learning hierarchical features for scene labeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35 (8), 1915–1929. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2012.231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felzenszwalb, P.F., et al., 2010. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32 (9), 1627–1645. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2009.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frahm, J.M., et al., 2010. Fast robust large-scale mapping from video and internet photo collections. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (6), 538–549. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., et al., 2012. Camera constraint-free view-based 3D object retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21 (4), 2269–2281. doi:10.1109/TIP.2011.2170081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., et al., 2014. 3-D object retrieval with Hausdorff distance learning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61 (4), 2088–2098. doi:10.1109/TIE.2013.2262760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y. and Lazebnik, S., 2011. Iterative quantization: a procrustean approach to learning binary codes. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 42, 817–824.
   Google Scholar
• Harzallah, H., Jurie, F., and Schmid, C., 2009. Combining efficient object localization and image classification. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision, 30, 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, B. and Wu, Q., 2008. Dynamic accessibility analysis for location based service using graph Voronoi diagram. Environment and Planning B, 35 (5), 831–846. doi:10.1068/b33118
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, K., et al., 2009. What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision, 30, 2146–2153.
   Google Scholar
• Jegou, H., et al., 2010. Aggregating local descriptors into a compact image representation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 238, 3304–3311.
   Google Scholar
• Kavukcuoglu, K., et al., 2010. Learning convolutional feature hierarchies for visual recognition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19, 1090–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G., 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 20, 1106–1114.
   Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., et al., 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, 2278–2324. doi:10.1109/5.726791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, B., et al., 2015. 3D object retrieval with multitopic model combining relevance feedback and LDA model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 24 (1), 94–105. doi:10.1109/TIP.2014.2372618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. and Li, X., 2015. Simulating urban growth in a metropolitan area based on weighted urban flows by using web search engine. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (10), 1721–1736. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1034721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A.-A., et al., 2016. Multi-modal clique-graph matching for view-based 3D model retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25 (5), 2103–2116. doi:10.1109/TIP.2016.2540802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, D.G., 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision, 1152, 1150–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, A., Papageorgiou, C., and Poggio, T., 2001. Example-based object detection in images by components. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23 (4), 349–361. doi:10.1109/34.917571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. and Darken, C.J., 1989. Fast learning in networks of locally-tuned processing units. Neural Computation, 1, 281–294. doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.2.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohbuchi, R. and Furuya, T., 2009. Scale-weighted dense bag of visual features for 3D model retrieval from a partial view 3D model. In: IEEE international conference on computer vision workshops. Kyoto: IEEE Society. 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, A. and Torralba, A., 2001. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145–175. doi:10.1023/A:1011139631724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raginsky, M. and Lazebnik, S., 2009. Locality-sensitive binary codes from shift-invariant kernels. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 17, 1509–1517.
   Google Scholar
• Ran, Y.H., et al., 2012. Large-scale land cover mapping with the integration of multi-source information based on the Dempster-Shafer theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (1), 169–191. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.577745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, X. and Ramanan, D., 2013. Histograms of sparse codes for object detection. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 9, 3246–3253.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, X., et al., 2012. Object retrieval and localization with spatially-constrained similarity measure and K-NN reranking. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 157, 3013–3020.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, X., et al., 2014. Spatially-constrained similarity measure for large-scale object retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36, 1229–1241. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2013.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, P.D., Quinn, J.A., and Jones, C.B., 2011. City model enrichment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66 (2), 223–234. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socher, R., et al., 2012. Convolutional-recursive deep learning for 3D object classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 20, 665–673.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, J.B., De Silva, V., and Langford, J.C., 2000. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290, 2319–2323. doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uijlings, J.R.R., et al., 2013. Selective search for object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 104, 154–171. doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0620-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedaldi, A., et al., 2009. Multiple kernels for object detection. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1, 606–613.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2016. A three-layered graph-based learning approach for remote sensing image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54 (10), 6020–6034. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2016.2579648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., et al., 2015. A multi-scale and hierarchical feature extraction method for terrestrial laser scanning point cloud classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53 (5), 2409–2425. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2014.2359951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., et al., 2009. Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1, 1794–1801.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., et al., 2013a. A spatial cognition-based urban building clustering approach and its applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (4), 721–740. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.700518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., et al., 2013b. Perception-based shape retrieval for 3D building models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 75, 76–91. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, C., et al., 2014. Viewpoint-aware representation for sketch-based 3D model retrieval. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 21 (8), 966–970. doi:10.1109/LSP.2014.2321764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar