Performance of shape indices and classification schemes for characterising perceptual shape complexity of building footprints in GIS

References

• Ai, T., et al., 2013. A shape analysis and template matching of building features by the Fourier transform method. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 219–233. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktas, M.A., 2012. Shape descriptors. Thesis (PhD). University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Angel, S., Parent, J., and Civco, D.L., 2010. Ten compactness properties of circles: measuring shape in geography. The Canadian Geographer /Le Geographe Canadien, 54 (4), 441–461. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkin, E., et al., 1991. An efficiently computable metric for comparing polygonal shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13 (3), 209–216. doi:10.1109/34.75509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardossy, A. and Schmidt, F., 2002. GIS approach to scale issues of perimeter-based shape indices for drainage basins. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 47 (6), 931–942. doi:10.1080/02626660209493001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basaraner, M. and Selcuk, M., 2008. A structure recognition technique in contextual generalisation of buildings and built-up areas. The Cartographic Journal, 45 (4), 274–285. doi:10.1179/174327708X347773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. and Longley, P., 1994. Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt, D. and Steiniger, S., 2005. Usage of principal component analysis in the process of automated generalisation. In: Proceedings of 22nd International Cartographic Conference, La Coruna, Spain: International Cartographic Association (ICA).
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, S., Chhetri, P., and Corcoran, J., 2009. Spatial patterns of urban compactness in Melbourne: an urban myth or a reality. In: B. Ostendorf, et al. eds. Proceedings of the surveying and spatial sciences institute biennial international conference. Adelaide, Australia: Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute (SSSI), 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Congalton, R.G. and Green, K., 2009. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data - principles and practices. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L.F. and Cesar, R.M., 2009. Shape classification and analysis: theory and practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., See, L., and Stillwell, J., 2013. A parcel shape index for use in land consolidation planning. Transactions in GIS, 17 (6), 861–882. doi:10.1111/tgis.2013.17.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, B.D., Torguson, J.S., and Hodler, T.W., 2009. Cartography: thematic map design. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, D., et al., 2013. Extracting building stock information from optical satellite imagery for mapping earthquake exposure and its vulnerability. Natural Hazards, 68 (1), 79–95. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0482-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, B., 2003. Extracting landmarks with data mining methods. In: W. Kuhn, M.F. Worboys, and S. Timpf, eds. Spatial information theory: foundations of geographic information science. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 2825. Heidelberg: Springer, 375–389.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, H., Zipf, A., and Qing, F., 2014. Estimation of building types on OpenStreetMap based on urban morphology analysis. In: J. Huerta, S. Schade, and C. Granell, eds. Connecting a digital Europe through location and place. Cham: Springer, 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Frohn, R.C., 2006. The use of landscape pattern metrics in remote sensing image classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27 (10), 2025–2032. doi:10.1080/01431160500212229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, C., 2006. Shape types for labeling natural polygon features with Maplex. Cartographic Perspectives, 54, 69–73. doi:10.14714/CP54.347
   Google Scholar
• Grabler, F., et al., 2008. Automatic generation of tourist maps. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 27 (3), 1–11. doi:10.1145/1360612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guienko, G. and Doytsher, Y., 2003. Geographic information system data for supporting feature extraction from high-resolution aerial and satellite images. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 129 (4), 158–164. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2003)129:4(158)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., 2015. A primer of GIS: fundamental geographic and cartographic concepts. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Kieler, B., and Sester, M., 2013. Urban building usage labeling by geometric and context analysis of the footprint data. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference, Dresden, Germany: International Cartographic Association (ICA).
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, L. and Liu, Y., 2012. Analyzing the shape characteristics of land use classes in remote sensing imagery. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, I-7, 135–140. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-I-7-135-2012
   Google Scholar
• Joubran Abu Daoud, J. and Doytsher, Y., 2004. A combined automated generalization model of spatial active objects. In: O. Altan, ed. ISPRS archives - volume XXXV part B4. Istanbul, Turkey: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), 210–215.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, J.-G., 1991. Computing a shape’s moments from its boundary. Pattern Recognition, 24 (10), 949–957. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(91)90092-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Goodchild, M.F., and Church, R., 2013. An efficient measure of compactness for two-dimensional shapes and its application in regionalization problems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (6), 1227–1250. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.752093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., 2007. Algorithmic foundation of multi-scale spatial representation. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J.G. and Mason, P.J., 2009. Essential image processing and GIS for remote sensing. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, U., 2014. Quantitative morphometric analysis of lakes using GIS: rectangularity R, ellipticity E, orientation O, and the rectangularity vs. ellipticity index, REi. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41 (4), 340–347. doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.919540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A., 1985. Compactness of geographic shape: comparison and evaluation of measures. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 67 (1), 53–67. doi:10.2307/490799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medda, F., Nijkamp, P., and Rietveld, P., 1998. Recognition and classification of urban shapes. Geographical Analysis, 30 (4), 304–314. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moellering, H. and Rayner, J.N., 1981. The harmonic analysis of spatial shapes using dual axis Fourier shape analysis (DAFSA). Geographical Analysis, 13 (1), 64–77. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1981.tb00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moellering, H. and Rayner, J.N., 1982. The dual axis Fourier shape analysis of closed cartographic forms. The Cartographic Journal, 19 (1), 53–59. doi:10.1179/caj.1982.19.1.53
   Google Scholar
• Moser, D., et al., 2002. Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 17 (7), 657–669. doi:10.1023/A:1021513729205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, J., Civco, D., and Angel, S., 2009. Shape metrics (presentation) [online]. In: ESRI 2009 User Conference, University of Connecticut. Available from: http://clear.uconn.edu/tools/Shape_Metrics/pubs.htm
   Google Scholar
• Paszto, V., 2013. On shape metrics in landscape analyses. In: First StatGIS Conference - Proceedings, 18-21 November 2013, Olomouc, Czech Republic: Department of Geoinformatics, Palacky University, 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Paszto, V., Brychtova, A., and Marek, L., 2015. On shape metrics in cartographic generalization: a case study of the building footprint geometry. In: J. Brus, A. Vondrakova, and V. Vozenilek, eds. Modern trends in cartography: selected papers of CARTOCON 2014, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Cham: Springer, 397–406.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, W., 2010. Principles of modeling uncertainties in spatial data and spatial analyses. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T.A., et al., 2009. Thematic cartography and geovisualization. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S., et al., 2008. An approach for the classification of urban building structures based on discriminant analysis techniques. Transactions in GIS, 12 (1), 31–59. doi:10.1111/tgis.2008.12.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S. and Weibel, R., 2007. Relations among map objects in cartographic generalization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34 (3), 175–197. doi:10.1559/152304007781697866
   Google Scholar
• Wentz, E., 1997. Shape analysis in GIS. In: Proceedings of Auto-Carto 13. Seattle, WA: ACSM/ASPRS, 204–213.
   Google Scholar
• Wentz, E., 2000. A shape definition for geographic applications based on edge, elongation, and perforation. Geographical Analysis, 32 (2), 95–112. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2000.tb00419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H., Weibel, R., and Yang, B., 2008. A multi-parameter approach to automated building grouping and generalization. Geoinformatica, 12 (1), 73–89. doi:10.1007/s10707-007-0020-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Kpalma, K., and Ronsin, J., 2008. Survey of shape feature extraction techniques. In: P.-Y. Yin, ed. Pattern recognition techniques, technology and applications. Rijeka: InTech, 43–90.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. and Lu, G., 2004. Review of shape representation and description techniques. Pattern Recognition, 37, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2003.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar