The world, the computer, and the mind: how Andrew Frank helped make human language and cognition cornerstones of geographic information science

References

• Abler, R.F., 1987. The National Science Foundation National Center for geographic information and analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1 (4), 303–326. doi:10.1080/02693798708927819
   Google Scholar
• Campari, I., et al. 1995. Cultural differences and cultural aspects in geographical information systems. In: T.L. Nyerges, eds. Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction for geographic information systems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 249–266.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, M., 2018. Space and spatial cognition: a multidisciplinary perspective. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, S., 1988. Approximate spatial reasoning. In: Proceedings, the first international conference on industrial & engineering applications of artificial intelligence & expert systems. Tullahoma, TN: ACM Press, Vol. 1, 126–140.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S.I., Rebich Hespanha, S., and Hegarty, M., 2010. Cognitively inspired and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (1), 13–29. doi:10.1080/00045600903362378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1992a. Spatial concepts, geometric data models, and geometric data structures. Computers & Geosciences, 18 (4), 409–417. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(92)90070-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1992b. Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 3 (4), 343–371. doi:10.1016/1045-926X(92)90007-9
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1996. Qualitative spatial reasoning: cardinal directions as an example. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 10 (3), 269–290. doi:10.1080/02693799608902079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 2010. How do people think about space? In: J.A. Bateman, et al., eds. Spatial representation and reasoning in language: Ontologies and logic of space, Proceedings of Dagstuhl Seminar 10131, 28 March–1 April 2010. Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., Bittner, S., and Raubal, M., 2001b. Spatial and cognitive simulation with multi-agent systems. In: D.R. Montello, ed. Spatial information theory: foundations of geographic information science, LNCS 2205. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 124–139.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 2000. Spatial communication with maps: defining the correctness of maps using a multi-agent simulation. In: C. Freksa, et al., eds. Spatial cognition II. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1998a. Formal models for cognition – taxonomy of spatial location description and frames of reference. In: C. Freksa, C. Habel, and K.F. Wender, eds. Spatial cognition: an interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge, LNAI 1404. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., Campari, I., and Formentini, U., eds, 1992. Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1993. The use of geographical information systems: the user interface is the system. In: D. Medyckyj-Scott and H. Hearnshaw, eds. Human factors in geographical information systems. London: Belhaven Press, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 2009. Multi-cultural aspects of spatial knowledge. In: K. Janowicz, M. Raubal, and S. Levashkin, eds. International conference on geospatial semantics, GeoS 2009, LNCS 5892. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., et al. 2003. Ontology for spatio-temporal databases. In: M. Koubarakis, eds. Spatio-temporal databases, LNCS 2520. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 9–77.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., 1998b. Different types of “times” in GIS. In: M.J. Egenhofer and R.G. Golledge, eds. Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems. New York: Oxford University Press, 40–62.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., Palmer, B., and Robinson, V., 1986. Formal methods for the accurate definition of some fundamental terms in physical geography. Proceedings, 2nd International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 583–599.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U., Raper, J., and Cheylan, J.-P., eds, 2001a. Life and motion of socio-economic units Vol. 8. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U. and Raubal, M., 1999. Formal specification of image schemata – a step towards interoperability in geographic information systems. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1 (1), 67–101. doi:10.1023/A:1010004718073
   Google Scholar
• Gao, S., et al., 2017. A data-synthesis-driven method for detecting and extracting vague cognitive regions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (6), 1245–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 1992. Geographical information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6 (1), 31–45. doi:10.1080/02693799208901893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, T.R., 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5 (2), 199–220. doi:10.1006/knac.1993.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabai, L., et al. 2007. Agent-based simulation of spatial cognition and wayfinding in building fire emergency evacuation. In: J. Li, S. Zlatanova, and A. Fabbri, eds. Geomatics solutions for disaster management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 255–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, P.J., 1978. The naive physics manifesto. In: D. Mitchie, ed. Expert systems in the microelectronic age. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 242–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, D., 1991. Relative representation of spatial knowledge: the 2-D case. In: D.M. Mark and A.U. Frank, eds. Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtle, S.C., 2011. Geographical design: spatial cognition and geographical information science. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. and Moore, R.C., eds, 1985. Formal theories of the commonsense world. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hobel, H., Fogliaroni, P., and Frank, A.U., 2016. Deriving the geographic footprint of cognitive regions. In: T. Sarjakoski, M.Y. Santos, and L.T. Sarjakoski, eds. Geospatial data in a changing world, LNGC. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hochmair, H. and Frank, A.U., 2000. Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks – analyzing the least-angle strategy. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2 (4), 283–313. doi:10.1023/A:1015566423907
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., 2016. Spatial thinking in geographic information science: students’ geospatial conceptions, map-based reasoning, and spatial visualization ability. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106 (1), 76–95. doi:10.1080/00045608.2015.1064342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., 1987. The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karimipour, F., et al.,2016. Contextual adaptability of navigational spatial descriptions: a pragmatic comparison. In: G. Gartner, M. Jobst, and H. Huang, eds. Progress in cartography, LNGC. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 413–443.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, K.K., ed, 2008. Encyclopedia of geographic information science. Thousand Oaks, CA, & London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., Hardisty, F., and Li, R., 2011. Interpreting spatial patterns: an inquiry into formal and cognitive aspects of Tobler’s First Law of Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101 (5), 1011–1031. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.577364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., et al., 2007. Linguistic and nonlinguistic turn direction concepts. In: S. Winter, eds. Spatial information theory. Berlin: Springer, 354–372.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W. and Frank, A.U., 1991. A formalization of metaphors and image-schemas in user interfaces. In: D.M. Mark and A.U. Frank, eds. Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 419–434.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, B., 1994. Qualitative reasoning: modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., et al., 1999. Cognitive models of geographic space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13 (8), 747–774. doi:10.1080/136588199241003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., 2011. Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M., 1993. Toward a theoretical framework for geographic entity types. In: A.U. Frank and I. Campari, eds. Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 270–283.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M. and Frank, A.U., eds, 1991. Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M. and Frank, A.U., 1992a. Languages of spatial relations: NCGIA Research Initiative 2, closing report. UCSB-Maine-SUNY Buffalo: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Report.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M. and Frank, A.U., 1992b. User interfaces for geographic information systems: report on the specialist meeting. UCSB-Maine-SUNY Buffalo: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Report 92–3.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D.M. and Frank, A.U., 1996. Experiential and formal models of geographic space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23 (1), 3–24. doi:10.1068/b230003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, R.B. and Usery, E.L., eds, 2005. A research agenda for geographic information science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D.R., 2009. Cognitive research in GIScience: recent achievements and future prospects. Geography Compass, 3 (5), 1824–1840. doi:10.1111/geco.2009.3.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D.R. and Frank, A.U., 1996. Modeling directional knowledge and reasoning in environmental space: testing qualitative metrics. In: J. Portugali, ed. The construction of cognitive maps. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 321–344.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D.R. and Freundschuh, S.M., 2005. Cognition of geographic information. In: R.B. McMaster and E.L. Usery, eds. A research agenda for geographic information science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 61–91.
   Google Scholar
• NCGIA, 1989. The research plan of the National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 3 (2), 117–136. doi:10.1080/02693798908941502
   Google Scholar
• Podobnikar, T. and Ceh, M., 2012. Universal ontology of geographic space: semantic enrichment for spatial data. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Raubal, M., Mark, D.M., and Frank, A.U., 2013. Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space: new perspectives on geographic information research. Berlin, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, K.-F. and Winter, S., 2014. Landmarks: GIScience for intelligent services. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V.B., Frank, A.U., and Blaze, M.A., 1986. Expert systems and geographic information systems: review and prospects. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 112 (2), 119–130. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1986)112:2(119)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E.H., 1978. Principles of categorization. In: E.H. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd, eds. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sadalla, E.K. and Montello, D.R., 1989. Remembering changes in direction. Environment and Behavior, 21 (3), 346–363. doi:10.1177/0013916589213006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, L., 1983. How language structures space. In: H.L. Pick and L.P. Acredolo, eds. Spatial orientation: theory, research, and application. New York: Plenum Press, 225–282.
   Google Scholar
• Tenbrink, T., Wiener, J.M., and Claramunt, C., eds, 2013. Representing space in cognition: interrelations of behaviour, language, and formal models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, A. and Stea, D., 2014. David Mark’s contribution to ethnophysiography research. International Journal of Geographical Information, 28 (6), 1246–1263. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.874560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, D. and Nadel, L., eds, 2012. Handbook of spatial cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, P., et al. 2013. Cognitive transactions – a communication model. In: T. Tenbrink, eds. Spatial information theory, LNCS 8116. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 129–148.
   Google Scholar