Enhancing areal interpolation frameworks through dasymetric refinement to create consistent population estimates across censuses

References

• Buttenfield, B.P., Ruther, M., and Leyk, S., 2015. Exploring the impact of dasymetric refinement on spatiotemporal small area estimates. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42 (5), 449–459. doi:10.1080/15230406.2015.1065206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A., Laird, N., and Rubin, D., 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39 (1), 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eicher, C.L. and Brewer, C.A., 2001. Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation: implementation and evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28 (2), 125–138. doi:10.1559/152304001782173727
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P. and Langford, M., 1995. Modelling the errors in areal interpolation between zonal systems by Monte Carlo simulation. Environment and Planning A, 27 (2), 211–224. doi:10.1068/a270211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, R. and Green, M., 1994. Areal interpolation and types of data. In: S. Fotheringham and P. Rogerson, eds. Spatial analysis and GIS. London: Taylor & Francis, 121–145.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. and Lam, N.S.N., 1980. Areal interpolation: a variant of the traditional spatial problem. Geo-Processing, 1, 297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Hennepin County GIS, 2016. Hennepin county geographic information systems [online]. Hennepin County. Available from: http://www.hennepin.us/gisopendata [Accessed 3 December 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J.B., Lo, C.P., and Hodler, T.W., 2004. Dasymetric estimation of population density and areal interpolation of census data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 31 (2), 103–121. doi:10.1559/1523040041649407
   Google Scholar
• Homer, C.G., et al., 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 81 (5), 345–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, M., 2006. Obtaining population estimates in non-census reporting zones: an evaluation of the 3-class dasymetric method. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30 (2), 161–180. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyk, S., et al., 2013. Establishing relationships between parcel data and land cover for demographic small area estimation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40 (4), 305–315. doi:10.1080/15230406.2013.782682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyk, S., et al., 2014. Modeling residential developed land in rural areas: a size-restricted approach using parcel data. Applied Geography, 47, 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyk, S., et al., 2018. Assessing the accuracy of multi-temporal built-up land layers across rural-urban trajectories in the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204, 898–917. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maantay, J., Maroko, A.R., and Herrmann, C., 2007. Mapping population distribution in the urban environment: the cadastral-based expert dasymetric system (CEDS). Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34 (2), 77–102. doi:10.1559/152304007781002190
   Google Scholar
• MassGIS, 2016. MassGIS data download - level 3 assessor’s parcels [online]. Office of Geographic Information (MassGIS), Commonwealth of Massachusetts, MassIT. Available from: http://www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/it-serv-and-support/application-serv/office-of-geographic-information-massgis/datalayers/download-level3-parcels.html [Accessed 3 December 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Mecklenburg County GIS, 2013. Data - open mapping - mecklenburg county GIS [online]. Available from: http://maps.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/openmapping/data.html [Accessed 3 December 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Mennis, J., 2003. Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping. The Professional Geographer, 55 (1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennis, J., 2009. Dasymetric mapping for estimating population in small areas. Geography Compass, 3 (2), 727–745. doi:10.1111/geco.2009.3.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Mennis, J., 2015. Increasing the accuracy of urban population analysis with dasymetric mapping. Cityscape (Washington, D.C.), 17 (1), 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennis, J., 2016. Dasymetric spatiotemporal interpolation. The Professional Geographer, 68 (1), 92–102. doi:10.1080/00330124.2015.1033669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, S., et al., 2017. IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: version 12.0 [Database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Available from: http://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V12.0
   Google Scholar
• Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics, 2016. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC) [online]. Available from: https://www.mrlc.gov/index.php [Accessed 3 December 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Nagle, N., et al., 2014. Dasymetric modeling and uncertainty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104 (1), 80–95. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.843439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavía, J. and Cantarino, I., 2017. Can dasymetric mapping significantly improve population data reallocation in a dense urban area? Geographical Analysis, 49 (2), 155–174. doi:10.1111/gean.12112
   Google Scholar
• Pesaresi, M., et al., 2016. Operating procedure for the production of the global human settlement layer from landsat data of the epochs 1975, 1990, 2000, and 2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, JRC Technical Report EUR 27741 EN. doi:10.2788/253582
   Google Scholar
• Ruther, M., Leyk, S., and Buttenfield, B.P., 2015. Comparing the effects of an NLCD-derived dasymetric refinement on estimation accuracies for multiple areal interpolation methods. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 52 (2), 158–178. doi:10.1080/15481603.2015.1018856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J.P., 2007. Target density weighting interpolation and uncertainty evaluation for temporal analysis of census data. Geographical Analysis, 39 (3), 311–335. doi:10.1111/gean.2007.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J.P. and Van Riper, D.C., 2013. Because Muncie’s densities are not Manhattan’s: using geographical weighting in the EM algorithm for areal interpolation. Geographical Analysis, 45 (3), 216–237. doi:10.1111/gean.12014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, 2016a. American factfinder - download center [online]. Available from: https://factfinder.census.gov [Accessed 26 November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, 2016b. TIGER/line shapefiles and TIGER/line files [online]. Census.gov, Maps and Data, TIGER Products. Available from: https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger-line.html [Accessed 25 November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• University of Florida GeoPlan Center, 2016. The Florida Geographic Data Library - FGDL [online]. University of Florida GeoPlan Center. Available from: http://www.fgdl.org/download/ [Accessed 3 December 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, J., et al., 2010. Thematic accuracy of the NLCD 2001 land cover for the conterminous United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114 (6), 1286–1296. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J., 1936. A method of mapping densities of population: with Cape Cod as an example. Geographical Review, 26 (1), 103–110. doi:10.2307/209467
   Google Scholar
• Zoraghein, H., et al., 2016. Exploiting temporal information in parcel data to refine small area population estimates. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 58, 19–28. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoraghein, H., 2018. Areal interpolation code. Harvard Dataverse. doi:10.7910/DVN/UBNNQS
   Google Scholar