Simulating urban growth boundaries using a patch-based cellular automaton with economic and ecological constraints

References

• Abolhasani, S., et al., 2016. Simulating urban growth under planning policies through parcel-based cellular automata (ParCA) model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (11), 2276–2301. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1184271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaei Moghadam, S., Karimi, M., and Habibi, K., 2018. Simulating urban growth in a megalopolitan area using a patch‐based cellular automata. Transactions in GIS, 22, 249–268. doi:10.1111/tgis.2018.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A.K., 2008. Greenbelts to contain urban growth in Ontario, Canada: promises and prospects. Planning, Practice & Research, 23 (4), 533–548. doi:10.1080/02697450802522889
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P.D., 2012. Survival analysis using SAS: a practical guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• An, L. and Brown, D.G., 2008. Survival analysis in land change science: integrating with GIScience to address temporal complexities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98 (2), 323–344. doi:10.1080/00045600701879045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. and Youn, Y.-C., 2006. Urban containment policies and the protection of natural areas: the case of Seoul’s greenbelt. Ecology and Society, 11 (1), 3. doi:10.5751/ES-01504-110103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, T., 2009. Developing conservation subdivisions: ecological constraints, regulatory barriers, and market incentives. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92 (2), 117–124. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B.Y., et al., 2017a. Measuring place-based accessibility under travel time uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (4), 783–804. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1238919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., et al., 2014. Modeling urban land-use dynamics in a fast developing city using the modified logistic cellular automaton with a patch-based simulation strategy. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (2), 234–255. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.831868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., et al., 2016. Capturing the varying effects of driving forces over time for the simulation of urban growth by using survival analysis and cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 152, 59–71. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., et al., 2010. An agent-based model for optimal land allocation (AgentLA) with a contiguity constraint. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (8), 1269–1288. doi:10.1080/13658810903401024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., et al., 2017b. A new approach for detecting urban centers and their spatial structure with nighttime light remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55 (11), 6305–6319. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2017.2725917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiacetto, E., 2007. Residential sub-market targeting by developers in Brisbane. Urban Policy and Research, 25 (2), 257–274. doi:10.1080/08111140701344833
   Google Scholar
• Deuskar, C., Baker, J.L., and Mason, D., 2015. East Asia’s changing urban landscape: measuring a decade of spatial growth. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Du, G., et al., 2018. A comparative approach to modelling multiple urban land use changes using tree-based methods and cellular automata: the case of Greater Tokyo Area. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (4), 757–782. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1410550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, S., Van Rompaey, A., and Shi, P., 2015. A dual effect of urban expansion on flood risk in the Pearl River Delta (China) revealed by land-use scenarios and direct runoff simulation. Natural Hazards, 77 (1), 111–128. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1583-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., 2017. Modeling dynamic urban land-use change with geographical cellular automata and generalized pattern search-optimized rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (6), 1198–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., Liu, Y., and Liu, Y., 2017. Spatially explicit assessment of land ecological security with spatial variables and logistic regression modeling in Shanghai, China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 31 (9), 2235–2249. doi:10.1007/s00477-016-1330-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, A.M., et al., 2012. A comparative analysis of cellular automata models for simulation of small urban areas in Galicia, NW Spain. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36 (4), 291–301. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavami, S.M., Taleai, M., and Arentze, T., 2017. An intelligent spatial land use planning support system using socially rational agents. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (5), 1022–1041. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1263306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, Q., et al., 2016. A hybrid parallel cellular automata model for urban growth simulation over GPU/CPU heterogeneous architectures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (3), 494–514. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1039538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H., et al., 2009. Effectiveness of urban construction boundaries in Beijing: an assessment. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 10 (9), 1285–1295. doi:10.1631/jzus.A0920317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Q., et al., 2018. Modeling urban growth boundary based on the evaluation of the extension potential: A case study of Wuhan city in China. Habitat International, 72, 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., et al., 2003. Validation of urban boundaries derived from global night-time satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24 (3), 595–609. doi:10.1080/01431160304982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebur, M.N., Pradhan, B., and Tehrany, M.S., 2015. Manifestation of LiDAR-derived parameters in the spatial prediction of landslides using novel ensemble evidential belief functions and support vector machine models in GIS. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8 (2), 674–690. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2341276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., et al., 2017. Embedding ecological sensitivity analysis and new satellite town construction in an agent-based model to simulate urban expansion in the beijing metropolitan region, China. Ecological Indicators, 82, 233–249. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., et al., 2017a. A new global land-use and land-cover change product at a 1-km resolution for 2010 to 2100 based on human–environment interactions. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107 (5), 1040–1059. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1303357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., et al., 2017b. A segment derived patch-based logistic cellular automata for urban growth modeling with heuristic rules. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65, 140–149. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Church, R.L., and Jankowski, P., 2008. Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land‐use allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (6), 601–622. doi:10.1080/13658810701587495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. and Li, X., 2016. Conflict resolution in the zoning of eco-protected areas in fast-growing regions based on game theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 170, 177–185. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., et al., 2017. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landscape and Urban Planning, 168, 94–116. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Dai, L., and Xiong, H., 2015. Simulation of urban expansion patterns by integrating auto-logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58 (6), 1113–1136. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.916612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2016. PSOLA: A heuristic land-use allocation model using patch-level operations and knowledge-informed rules. PloS one, 11 (6), e0157728. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, H., et al., 2007. Socio-economic driving forces of land-use change in Kunshan, the Yangtze River Delta economic area of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 83 (3), 351–364. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Y., et al., 2013. Urban growth boundaries of the Beijing Metropolitan Area: comparison of simulation and artwork. Cities, 31, 337–348. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Y., et al., 2015. Evaluating the effectiveness of urban growth boundaries using human mobility and activity records. Cities, 46, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, S., Li, X., and Cai, Y., 2017. Delimiting the urban growth boundaries with a modified ant colony optimization model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 62, 146–155. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubarak, F.A., 2004. Urban growth boundary policy and residential suburbanization: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Habitat International, 28 (4), 567–591. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2003.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A., et al., 2017. Coupling agent-based, cellular automata and logistic regression into a hybrid urban expansion model (HUEM). Land Use Policy, 69, 529–540. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A., et al., 2018a. Modelling built-up expansion and densification with multinomial logistic regression, cellular automata and genetic algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 67, 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A., et al., 2018b. Comparing support vector machines with logistic regression for calibrating cellular automata land use change models. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51 (1), 391–401. doi:10.1080/22797254.2018.1442179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A., et al., 2018c. A Time Monte Carlo method for addressing uncertainty in land-use change models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1503275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A.C. and Duncan, J.B., 1995. Growth management principles and practices. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, B., Gray, J., and Meentemeyer, R., 2017. Comparing quantity, allocation and configuration accuracy of multiple land change models. Land, 6 (3), 52. doi:10.3390/land6030052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, N., Antunes, A.P., and Roca, J., 2017. Applicability and calibration of an irregular cellular automata model for land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65, 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius, R., et al., 2008. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. The Annals of Regional Science, 42 (1), 11–37. doi:10.1007/s00168-007-0138-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienow, A. and Goetzke, R., 2015. Supporting SLEUTH–enhancing a cellular automaton with support vector machines for urban growth modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 66–81. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santé-Riveira, I., et al., 2008. Algorithm based on simulated annealing for land-use allocation. Computers & Geosciences, 34 (3), 259–268. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaab, J., et al., 2018. Improving the performance of genetic algorithms for land-use allocation problems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (5), 907–930. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1419249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, J., et al., 2015. An improved artificial bee Colony-Based approach for zoning protected ecological areas. PloS one, 10 (9), e0137880. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, K., et al., 2014. Evaluation of NPP-VIIRS night-time light composite data for extracting built-up urban areas. Remote Sensing Letters, 5 (4), 358–366. doi:10.1080/2150704X.2014.905728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smola, A. and Schölkopf, B., 2004. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14 (3), 199–222. doi:10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S., 2014. Weka: a tool for data preprocessing, classification, ensemble, clustering and association rule mining. International Journal of Computer Applications, 88 (10), 26–29. doi:10.5120/15389-3809
   Google Scholar
• Tayyebi, A., Pijanowski, B.C., and Tayyebi, A.H., 2011. An urban growth boundary model using neural networks, GIS and radial parameterization: an application to Tehran, Iran. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100 (1), 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. and Marceau, D.J., 2013. A patch‐based cellular automaton for simulating land‐use changes at fine spatial resolution. Transactions in GIS, 17 (6), 828–846. doi:10.1111/tgis.2013.17.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H. and Brown, D.G., 2017. Sensitivity of a stochastic land-cover change model to pixel versus polygonal land units. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (4), 738–762. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1231316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., et al., 2014. Object-based spatial cluster analysis of urban landscape pattern using nighttime light satellite images: A case study of China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (11), 2328–2355. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.922186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, K., Wang, S., and Li, D., 2011. The negative approach to urban growth planning of Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54 (9), 1209–1236. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.564488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., et al., 2016. Simulating multi-objective land use optimization allocation using Multi-agent system—a case study in Changsha, China. Ecological Modelling, 320, 334–347. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X.-Q. and Lv, L.-N., 2016. A WOE method for urban growth boundary delineation and its applications to land use planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (4), 691–707. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1091461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, R., et al., 2016. The delimitation of urban growth boundaries using the CLUE-S land-use change model: study on Xinzhuang Town, Changshu City, China. Sustainability, 8 (11), 1182. doi:10.3390/su8111182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar