A comparative analysis of accessibility measures by the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method

References

• Allan, D.P., 2014. Catchments of general practice in different countries–A literature review. International Journal of Health Geographics, 13 (1), 32. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-13-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Apparicio, P., et al., 2017. The approaches to measuring the potential spatial access to urban health services revisited: distance types and aggregation-error issues. International Journal of Health Geographics, 16 (1), 32. doi:10.1186/s12942-017-0105-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcury, T.A., et al., 2005. The effects of geography and spatial behavior on healthcare utilization among the residents of a rural region. Health Services Research, 40, 135–155. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00346.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., et al., 2013. Access to primary health care: does neighborhood of residence matter. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103 (1), 85–105. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.685050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBPP 2017. SNAP retailers database [online]. Available from: https://www.cbpp.org/snap-retailers-database [Accessed 20 December 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., 2017. Take the edge off: A hybrid geographic food access measure. Applied Geography, 87, 149–159. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., 2019. Enhancing the two-step floating catchment area model for community food access mapping: case of the supplemental nutrition assistance program. The Professional Geographer, in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. and Jia, P., 2019. Available from: accessibility maps by twenty-four 2SFCA models [dataset]. Figshare. [Accessed 19 February 19 February]. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7742813.v2
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. and Kwan, M.P., 2015. Contextual uncertainties, human mobility, and perceived food environment: the uncertain geographic context problem in food access research. American Journal of Public Health, 105 (9), 1734–1737. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., et al., 2013. The temporal hierarchy of shelters: a hierarchical location model for earthquake shelter planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (8), 1612–1630. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.763944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D., 2010. Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit. Health & Place, 16 (5), 1038–1052. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D., 2011. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: where to intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102 (4), 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. and Wang, F., 2011. Geographic disparities in accessibility to food stores in Southwest Mississippi. Environment & Planning B, 38 (4), 659–677. doi:10.1068/b36149
   Google Scholar
• Dai, T.Q., et al., 2018. Incorporating job diversity preference into measuring job accessibility. Cities, 78, 108–115. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamater, P.L., 2013. Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems: a modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric. Health & Place, 24 (6), 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fotheringham, A.S., 1981. Spatial structure and distance-decay parameters. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 71 (3), 425–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, K., et al., 2015. A commuter-based two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility of daycare centers. Health & Place, 32, 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K.T. and Wee, B.V., 2004. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (2), 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Gibin, M., Longley, P., and Atkinson, P. 2007. Kernel density estimation and percent volume contours in general practice catchment area analysis in urban areas. In: Proceedings of the Geographical Information Science Research UK Conference 2007, 11–13 April 2007 Maynooth, Ireland. 270–276. doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Guy, C.M., 1983. The assessment of access to local shopping opportunities: a comparison of accessibility measures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 10 (2), 219–237. doi:10.1068/b100219
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstraand, T., 1970. What about people in regional science? Papers in Regional Science, 24 (1), 7–24. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, W.G., 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25 (2), 73–76. doi:10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, K.E. and Fotheringham, A.S., 1984. Gravity and spatial interaction models. Vol. 2, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jamtsho, S., Corner, R., and Dewan, A., 2015. Spatio-temporal analysis of spatial accessibility to primary health care in Bhutan. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4 (3), 1584–1604. doi:10.3390/ijgi4031584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, A.E. and Bantock, P.R., 1982. Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: a method and case study. Social Science & Medicine, 16 (1), 85. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(82)90428-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M., 2010. Space‐time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point‐based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30 (3), 191–216. doi:10.1111/gean.1998.30.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.P., et al., 2003. Recent advances in accessibility research: representation, methodology and applications. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5 (1), 129–138. doi:10.1007/s101090300107
   Google Scholar
• Langford, M., Fry, R., and Higgs, G., 2012. Measuring transit system accessibility using a modified two-step floating catchment technique. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (2), 193–214. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.574140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., et al., 2018. A multi-modal relative spatial access assessment approach to measure spatial accessibility to primary care providers. International Journal of Health Geographics, 17 (1), 33. doi:10.1186/s12942-018-0153-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luck, M. and Wu, J., 2002. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology, 17 (4), 327–339. doi:10.1023/A:1020512723753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J., 2014. Integrating the huff model and floating catchment area methods to analyze spatial access to healthcare services. Transactions in GIS, 18 (3), 436–448. doi:10.1111/tgis.2014.18.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, W. and Qi, Y., 2009. An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health & Place, 15 (4), 1100–1107. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, W. and Wang, F., 2003. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30 (6), 865–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, W. and Whippo, T., 2012. Variable catchment sizes for the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Health & Place, 18 (4), 789–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, L. and Nekorchuk, D., 2013. Measuring spatial accessibility to healthcare for populations with multiple transportation modes. Health & Place, 24 (6), 115–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mceachern, M.G. and Warnaby, G., 2006. Food shopping behaviour in Scotland: the influence of relative rurality. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30 (2), 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• McGrail, M.R., 2012. Spatial accessibility of primary health care utilising the two step floating catchment area method: an assessment of recent improvements. International Journal of Health Geographics, 11 (1), 50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGrail, M.R. and Humphreys, J.S., 2009. A new index of access to primary care services in rural areas. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 33 (5), 418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail, M.R. and Humphreys, J.S., 2014. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: utilising dynamic catchment sizes. Applied Geography, 54, 182–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail, M.R., Humphreys, J.S., and Ward, B., 2015. Accessing doctors at times of need–measuring the distance tolerance of rural residents for health-related travel. BMC Health Services Research, 15 (1), 212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milakis, D., et al., 2015. Do people consider an acceptable travel time? Evidence from Berkeley, CA. Journal of Transport Geography, 44, 76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H.J., 2004. Tobler’s first law and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94 (2), 284–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H.J., 2010. Measuring space–time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis, 31 (1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Neutens, T., et al., 2010. Equity of urban service delivery: a comparison of different accessibility measures. Environment & Planning A, 42 (7), 1613–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngui, A.N. and Apparicio, P., 2011. Optimizing the two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility to medical clinics in Montreal. BMC Health Services Research, 11 (1), 166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radke, J. and Mu, L., 2000. Spatial decompositions, modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs. Geographic Information Sciences, 6 (2), 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N., Bérubé, M., and Crooks, V.A., 2010. Measuring potential spatial access to primary health care physicians using a modified gravity model. Canadian Geographer, 54 (1), 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiue, C.H., 2002. Transport costs and the geography of arbitrage in eighteenth-century China. American Economic Review, 92 (5), 1406–1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. and Anselin, L., 1998. Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment & Planning A, 30 (4), 595–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Z. and Cheng, Y., 2016. Research progress of the two-step floating catchment area method and extensions [in Chinese]. Progress in Geography, 35 (5), 589–599.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W.R., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau 2016. TIGER/Line with selected demographic and economic data [online]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger-data.html [Accessed 19 February 2019]
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture 2017. Food access research atlas [online]. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/. [Accessed 19 February 2019]
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture 2018. Retailer management year end summary 2017 [online]. Available from: https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap-retailer-data [Accessed 19 February 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Van Meter, E.M., et al., 2010. An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: A simulation study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 9, 40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, N., et al., 2012a. A relative spatial access assessment approach for analyzing potential spatial access to colorectal cancer services in Texas. Applied Geography, 32 (2), 291–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, N., Zou, B., and Sternberg, T., 2012b. A three-step floating catchment area method for analyzing spatial access to health services. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (6), 1073–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., 2012. Measurement, optimization, and impact of health care accessibility: A methodological review. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 102 (5), 1104–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., 2017. Inverted two-step floating catchment area method for measuring facility crowdedness. The Professional Geographer, 70 (2), 251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, L., Liu, Y., and Liu, X., 2018. Measuring spatial disparity in accessibility with a multi-mode method based on park green spaces classification in Wuhan, China. Applied Geography, 94, 251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Goerge, R., and Mullner, R., 2006. Comparing GIS-based methods of measuring spatial accessibility to health services. Journal of Medical Systems, 30, 23–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao, J., Murray, A.T., and Agadjanian, V., 2013. A geographical perspective on access to sexual and reproductive health care for women in rural Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 96, 60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., et al., 2018. An improved two-step floating catchment area method for evaluating spatial accessibility to urban emergency shelters. Sustainability, 10 (7), 2180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar