The impact of interactive visualization on trade-off-based geospatial decision-making

References

• Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., and Jankowski, P., 2003a. Building spatial decision support tools for individuals and groups. Journal of Decision Systems, 12 (2), 193–208. doi:10.3166/jds.12.193-208
   Google Scholar
• Andrienko, G.L. and Andrienko, N.V., 1999. Interactive maps for visual data exploration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13 (4), 355–374. doi:10.1080/136588199241247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrienko, N., et al. 2002. Testing the usability of interactive maps in commonGIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29 (4), 325–342. doi:10.1559/152304002782008369
   Google Scholar
• Andrienko, N. and Andrienko, G., 2003. Informed spatial decisions through coordinated views. Information Visualization, 2 (4), 270–285. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500058
   Google Scholar
• Andrienko, N. and Andrienko, G., 2004. Interactive visual tools to explore spatio-temporal variation. In:Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces - AVI ’04, 417. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., and Gatalsky, P., 2003b. Exploratory spatio-temporal visualization: an analytical review. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 14 (6), 503–541. doi:10.1016/S1045-926X(03)00046-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniegas, G., Janssen, R., and Omtzigt, N., 2011. Map-based multicriteria analysis to support interactive land use allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (12), 1931–1947. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.556118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniegas, G., Janssen, R., and Rietveld, P., 2013. Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: results of an experiment. Environmental Modelling and Software, 39, 159–175. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista, J. and Carenini, G., 2006. An integrated task-based framework for the design and evaluation of visualizations to support preferential choice. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI ’06, New York, NY: ACM, 217–224. doi:10.1145/1133265.1133308.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, J. and Carenini, G., 2008. An empirical evaluation of interactive visualizations for preferential choice. In: AVI ’08: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, 28–30. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, B., Kraus, K., and Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., 2015. Interactive visualization for optimal placement of public-access AEDs. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, VAST 2014 - Proceedings, 231–232. Paris, France: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Carenini, G. and Loyd, J., 2004. Valuecharts: analyzing linear models expressing preferences and evaluations. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI ’04, New York, NY: ACM, 150–157. doi:10.1145/989863.989885.
   Google Scholar
• Carpendale, S., 2008. Information visualization. In: A. Kerren, et al., eds. Information visualization. lecture notes in computer science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Ch. Evaluating Information Visualizations, 19–45.
   Google Scholar
• Crossland, M.D., Wynne, B.E., and Perkins, W.C., 1995. Exploring the next generation of decision supportspatial decision support systems: an overview of technology and a test of efficacy. Decision Support Systems, 14 (3), 219–235. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016792369400018N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A.R. and Carte, T.A., 1998. Using geographical information systems for decision making: extending cognitive fit theory to map-based presentations. Information Systems Research, 9 (2), 194–203. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimara, E., Bezerianos, A., and Dragicevic, P., 2018. Conceptual and methodological issues in evaluating multidimensional visualizations for decision support. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24 (1), 749–759. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2017.2745138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI, 2013. Explorer for arcgis. Available from: http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/explorer. [Accessed 20 Mar 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Gratzl, S., et al. 2013. LineUp: visual analysis of multi-attribute rankings. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19 (12), 2277–2286. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M.C., et al. 2016. Web-based geospatial multiple criteria decision analysis using open software and standards. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (8), 1667–1686. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1155214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H., 1998. Even swaps: A rational method for making trade-offs. Harvard Business Review, 76 (2), 137–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H., 1999. Smart choices - a practical guide to making better life decisions. 1st ed. New York, USA: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, T., et al., 2013. A systematic review on the practice of evaluating visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19 (12), 2818–2827. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6634108/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., Siraj, S., and Nemery, P., 2016. Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)-AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool. Energy, 95, 602–611. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P., Andrienko, N., and Andrienko, G., 2001. Map-centred exploratory approach to multiple criteria spatial decision making. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15 (2), 101–127. doi:10.1080/13658810010005525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P. and Nyerges, T., 2001. GIS-supported collaborative decision making: results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91 (1), 48–70. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., et al. 1991. Anomalies the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 193–206. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H., 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives - preferences and value tradeoffs. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kienberger, S., et al. 2013. A WebGIS tool for visualizing and exploring socioeconomic vulnerability to dengue fever in Cali, Colombia. Geospatial Health, 8 (1), 313–316. doi:10.4081/gh.2013.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, J., Eisend, M., and Petermann, A., 2009. Path dependence in decision-making processes: exploring the impact of complexity under increasing returns. Business Research, 2 (1), 67–84. doi:10.1007/BF03343529
   Google Scholar
• Kollat, J.B. and Reed, P., 2007. A framework for visually interactive decision-making and design using evolutionary multi-objective optimization (video). Environmental Modelling & Software, 22 (12), 1691–1704. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahtinen, T.J. and Hämäläinen, R.P., 2016. Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method. European Journal of Operational Research, 249 (3), 890–898. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, H., et al. 2012. Empirical studies in information visualization: seven scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18 (9), 1520–1536. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H.L. and Ma, L.C., 2008. Visualizing decision process on spheres based on the even swap concept. Decision Support Systems, 45 (2), 354–367. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J. and Rinner, C., 2015. Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. New York, USA: Springer, 90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Milutinovic, G., Ahonen-Jonnarth, U., and Seipel, S., 2018. GISwaps - A new method for decision making in continuous choice models based on even swaps. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 10 (3), 57–78. doi:10.4018/IJDSST
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milutinovic, G. and Seipel, S., 2018. Visual GISwaps - an interactive visualization frame- work for geospatial decision making. In: D. Bechmann, A.P. Cláudio, and J. Braz, eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications. Funchal, Madeira, Portugal: SCITEPRESS.
   Google Scholar
• Munzner, T., 2009. A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15 (6), 921–928. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2009.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajer, S., et al. 2017. WeightLifter: visual weight space exploration for multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23 (1), 611–620. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, W.B., et al., 2017. Interactive visualizations for decision support: application of Rasmussen’s abstraction-aggregation hierarchy. Applied Ergonomics, 59, 541–553. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, J.D., et al., 2009. The digital workshop: exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (6), 2090–2101. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj, S., Mikhailov, L., and Keane, J.A., 2015. PriEsT: an interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pairwise comparison judgments. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22 (2), 217–235. doi:10.1111/itor.2015.22.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Griffin, D., and Tversky, A., 1990. Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In: Robin M. Hogarth eds. Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. University of Chicago Press, 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Smelcer, J.B. and Erran, C., 1997. The effectiveness of different representations for managerial problem solving: comparing tables a .. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner . Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Decisions Sciences, 28 (2), 391–420. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speier, C., 2006. The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64 (11), 1115–1131. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (4), 1039–1061. doi:10.2307/2937956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerio, M., et al. 2015. An interactive decision-support system for multi-objective optimization of nonlinear dynamic processes with uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 42 (21), 7710–7731. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waser, J., et al. 2014. Many plans: multidimensional ensembles for visual decision support in flood management. Computer Graphics Forum, 33 (3), 281–290. doi:10.1111/cgf.12384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, C. and Shneiderman, B., 1992. The dynamic homefinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploration system. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR ’92, 338–346. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=133160.133216.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Xia, Z., and Wang, T., 2013. A real-time interactive simulation framework for watershed decision making using numerical models and virtual environment. Journal of Hydrology, 493, 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar