31,828
Views
70
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section: Real-time GIS and Smart Cities

Real-time GIS for smart cities

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 311-324 | Received 23 Sep 2019, Accepted 24 Sep 2019, Published online: 09 Oct 2019

References

  • Adame, T., et al., 2018. CUIDATS: an RFID–WSN hybrid monitoring system for smart health care environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78 (2), 602–615. doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.12.023.
  • Allam, Z. and Dhunny, Z.A., 2019. On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities, 89 (2019), 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032.
  • Bae, J.W., et al., 2016. Combining microsimulation and agent-based model for micro-level population dynamics. Procedia Computer Science, 80 (2016), 507–517. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.331.
  • Ballas, D., Clarke, G., and Turton, I. 1999, July. Exploring microsimulation methodologies for the estimation of household attributes. In: J. Diaz, Ed. In: 4th International Conference on GeoComputation, Mary Washington College. Virginia, USA: GeoComputation CD-ROM.
  • Batty, M., 2007. Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 565.
  • Batty, M., 2016. Classifying urban models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43 (2), 251–256. doi:10.1177/0265813516630803.
  • Batty, M., 2018a. Inventing future cities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 282.
  • Batty, M., 2018b. Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45 (5), 817–820. doi:10.1177/2399808318796416.
  • Batty, M., 2018c. Artificial intelligence and smart cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45 (1), 3–6. doi:10.1177/2399808317751169.
  • Batty, M., et al., 2012. Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214 (1), 481–518. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3.
  • Bazzani, A., et al. 2011, May. Now casting of traffic state by GPS data. The metropolitan area of Rome. In: 2011 Proceedings of the 34th International Convention MIPRO. Opatija, Croatia: IEEE, 1615–1618.
  • Botta, A., et al., 2016. Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: a survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56 (2016), 684–700. doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.09.021.
  • Brynielsson, J., et al., 2018. Informing crisis alerts using social media: best practices and proof of concept. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26 (1), 28–40. doi:10.1111/jccm.2018.26.issue-1.
  • Cardellini, V., Nardelli, M., and Luzi, D. 2016, July. Elastic stateful stream processing in storm. In: 2016 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS). IEEE, 583–590. doi:10.1177/1753193415600670.
  • Chen, N., et al., 2017. Smart city surveillance in fog computing. In: C. X. Mavromoustakis, G. Mastorakis and C. Dobre, eds. Advances in mobile cloud computing and big data in the 5G era. Cham: Springer, 203–226.
  • Chen, W., Guo, F., and Wang, F.Y., 2015. A survey of traffic data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16 (6), 2970–2984. doi:10.1109/TITS.2015.2436897.
  • Chen, X. and Zhan, F.B., 2008. Agent-based modelling and simulation of urban evacuation: relative effectiveness of simultaneous and staged evacuation strategies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59 (1), 25–33. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602321.
  • Chowdhury, B. and Chowdhury, M.U. 2007. RFID-based real-time smart waste management system. In: 2007 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference. doi:10.1109/atnac.2007.4665232.
  • Clarke, K.C., 2018. Cellular automata and agent-based models. In: M.M. Fisher and P. Nijkamp, eds. Handbook of regional science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1–16. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_63-1.
  • Crnovrsanin, T., et al. 2009, October. Proximity-based visualization of movement trace data. In: 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology. IEEE, 11–18. doi: 10.1007/s10877-008-9158-4.
  • Dean, J. and Ghemawat, S., 2008. MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51 (1), 107–113. doi:10.1145/1327452.
  • Deville, P., et al., 2016. Scaling identity connects human mobility and social interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (26), 7047–7052. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525443113.
  • Doran, D., et al., 2016. Social media enabled human sensing for smart cities. AI Communications, 29 (1), 57–75. doi:10.3233/AIC-150683.
  • Esser, J. and Schreckenberg, M., 1997. Microscopic simulation of urban traffic based on cellular automata. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 08 (05), 1025–1036. doi:10.1142/S0129183197000904.
  • Fahmy, A., et al. 2019, March. Role of RFID technology in smart city applications. In: 2019 International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA). Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: IEEE, 1–6.
  • Ferreira, N., et al., 2013. Visual exploration of big spatio-temporal urban data: A study of new york city taxi trips. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19 (12), 2149–2158. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.226.
  • Gaud, N., et al., 2008. Holonic multilevel simulation of complex systems: application to real-time pedestrians simulation in virtual urban environment. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 16 (10), 1659–1676. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2008.08.015.
  • Ge, Q. and Fukuda, D., 2016. Updating origin–destination matrices with aggregated data of GPS traces. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 69 (2016), 291–312. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.002.
  • Golderzahi, V. and Pao, H.K. 2018, July. Understanding customers and their grouping via WiFi sensing for business revenue forecasting. In: International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. Cham: Springer, 56–71.
  • Gonzalez, M.C., Hidalgo, C.A., and Barabasi, A.L., 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature, 453 (7196), 779. doi:10.1038/nature06958.
  • Goodchild, M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4), 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
  • Goodchild, M.F., 2010. Towards geodesign: repurposing cartography and GIS? Cartographic Perspectives, 66 (2010), 7–22. doi:10.14714/CP66.93.
  • Guo, L., et al., 2018. HuAc: human activity recognition using crowdsourced WiFi signals and skeleton data. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, ID 6163475, 1–15. doi:10.1155/2018/6163475
  • Hashem, I.A.T., et al., 2016. The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of Information Management, 36 (5), 748–758. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.002.
  • Hu, X., An, S., and Wang, J., 2014. Exploring urban taxi drivers’ activity distribution based on GPS data. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2 (2014), 1–13.
  • Hudson-Smith, A. and Batty, M., 2014. Visual analytics for urban design. Urban Design, 132 (2014), 38–41.
  • Kafi, M.A., et al., 2012. A study of wireless sensor network architectures and projects for traffic light monitoring. Procedia Computer Science, 10, 543–552. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.06.069
  • Kontokosta, C.E. and Johnson, N., 2017. Urban phenology: toward a real-time census of the city using Wi-Fi data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 144–153. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.011
  • Kraak, M.J. 2003, August. The space-time cube revisited from a geovisualization perspective. In: Proc. 21st International Cartographic Conference: Cartographic Renaissance, Durban, South Africa. 1988–1996.
  • Li, W. and Wang, S., 2017. PolarGlobe: A web-wide virtual globe system for visualizing multidimensional, time-varying, big climate data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (8), 1562–1582. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1306863.
  • Li, Y., et al., 2015. Real-time flood simulations using CA model driven by dynamic observation data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (4), 523–535. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.977292.
  • Lomax, N. and Smith, A.P., 2017. Microsimulation for demography. Australian Population Studies, 1 (1), 73–85.
  • Marz, N. and Warren, J., 2015. Big data: principles and best practices of scalable real-time data systems. New York: Manning Publications Co., Shelter Island, NY, 301.
  • Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L.F., and Zhang, J., 2014. Smart government, citizen participation and open data. Information Polity, 19 (1,2), 1–4. doi:10.3233/IP-140334.
  • Müller, K. and Axhausen, K.W., 2010. Population synthesis for microsimulation: state of the art. Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs-und Raumplanung, 638 (2010), 1–11.
  • Ngu, A.H., et al., 2016. IoT middleware: A survey on issues and enabling technologies. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4 (1), 1–20. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2016.2615180.
  • Ogawa, M. and Ma, K.L. 2010, October. Software evolution storylines. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Visualization. Salt Lake City, UT: ACM, 35–42.
  • Panagiotou, N., et al. 2016, September. Intelligent urban data monitoring for smart cities. In: Joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Cham: Springer, 177–192. doi:10.1177/1753193415610529.
  • Park, Y., et al., in press. Assessing public transit performance using real-time data: spatiotemporal patterns of bus operation delays in Columbus, Ohio, USA. International Journal of Geographical Information Science.
  • Parker, J. and Epstein, J.M., 2011. A distributed platform for global-scale agent-based models of disease transmission. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 22 (1), 2. doi:10.1145/2043635.2043637.
  • Prabhu, S.B., et al., 2013. Mobility assisted dynamic routing for mobile wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Information Technology, 3 (1), 9. doi:10.5121/ijait.2013.3102.
  • Pu, J., et al. 2013, June. T-Watcher: A new visual analytic system for effective traffic surveillance. In: 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (Vol. 1). Milan, Italy: IEEE, 127–136.
  • Rashid, B. and Rehmani, M.H., 2016. Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 60, 192–219. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.09.008
  • Rawat, P., et al., 2014. Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies. The Journal of Supercomputing, 68 (1), 1–48. doi:10.1007/s11227-013-1021-9.
  • Rivard, K. and Cogswell, D., 2004. Are you drowning in bi reports? using analytical dashboards to cut through the clutter. Information Management, 14 (4), 26.
  • Sahni, Y., Cao, J., and Shen, J., 2018. Challenges and opportunities in designing smart spaces. In: B. Di Martino, K.C. Li, L. T. Yang and A. Esposito, eds. Internet of everything. Singapore: Springer, 131–152.
  • Sengupta, U., 2017. Complexity Science: the urban is a complex adaptive system. In: defining the Urban. Routledge. In: D. Iossifova and C.D. Gasparato, eds. Defining the urban: interdisciplinary and professional perspectives. London: Routledge, 249–265.
  • Shvachko, K., et al., 2010, May. The hadoop distributed file system. In: A. Amer and  S. Coleman, eds. MSST (Vol. 10). Incline Village: Nevada, 1–10.
  • Sivanandam, R., et al. 2012. Advanced Traveller Information System (ATIS) for Indian cities. Available from: https://coeut.iitm.ac.in/umcsp/pdfweb/v2iitm_ATIS%20For%20indian%20cities_v2.pdf
  • Soundararaj, B., Cheshire, J., and Longley, P., in press. Estimating real-time high-street footfall from Wi-Fi probe requests. International Journal of Geographical Information Science.
  • Stehle, S. and Kitchin, R., in press. Real-time and archival data visualisation techniques in city dashboards. International Journal of Geographical Information Science.
  • Stojanovic, D., Predic, B., and Stojanovic, N. 2016. Mobile crowd sensing for smart urban mobility. In: Capineri, C., Haklay, M., Huang, H., Antoniou, V., Kettunen, J., Ostermann, F., and Purves, R., (Eds). European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. London: Ubiquity Press, 371–382.
  • Strohbach, M., et al., 2015. Towards a big data analytics framework for IoT and smart city applications. In: F. Xhafa, L. Barolli, A. Barolli and P. Papajorgji, eds. Modeling and processing for next-generation big-data technologies. Cham: Springer, 257–282.
  • Subasinghe, I. et al., in press. Real-time mapping of natural disasters using citizen update streams. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1–29.
  • Sui, D., Elwood, S., and Goodchild, M., Eds., 2012. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Tsiropoulou, E.E., et al., 2017. RFID-based smart parking management system. Cyber-Physical Systems, 3 (1–4), 22–41. doi:10.1080/23335777.2017.1358765.
  • Waddell, P., 2002. UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68 (3), 297–314. doi:10.1080/01944360208976274.
  • Wang, F., et al. (2014, October). A visual reasoning approach for data-driven transport assessment on urban roads. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). IEEE, 103–112. doi:10.3389/fchem.2014.00103.
  • Zaharia, M., et al. (2012, June). Discretized streams: an efficient and fault-tolerant model for stream processing on large clusters. In: Proceedings of the 4th USENIX conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing. Boston, MA: USENIX Association, 10.
  • Zaharia, M., et al., 2016. Apache spark: a unified engine for big data processing. Communications of the ACM, 59 (11), 56–65. doi:10.1145/2934664.
  • Zhang, J., et al. 2016, May. Wifi-id: human identification using wifi signal. In: 2016 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). Washington, DC: IEEE, 75–82.
  • Zhang, X., et al., 2018. Identifying urban functional zones using public bicycle rental records and point-of-interest data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7 (12), 459. doi:10.3390/ijgi7120459.
  • Zhong, C., et al., 2016. Variability in regularity: mining temporal mobility patterns in London, Singapore and Beijing using smart-card data. PloS One, 11 (2), e0149222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149222.
  • Zhou, Y., et al., 2018. Understanding urban human mobility through crowdsensed data. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56 (11), 52–59. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700569.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.