2,609
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special section: Computational Movement Analysis

Understanding intra-urban human mobility through an exploratory spatiotemporal analysis of bike-sharing trajectories

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 2451-2474 | Received 10 Apr 2019, Accepted 03 Jan 2020, Published online: 05 Feb 2020

References

  • Ai, Y., Li, Z., and Gan, M., 2018b. A solution to measure traveler’s transfer tolerance for walking mode and dockless bike-sharing mode. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2018 (1), 1–18.
  • Ai, Y., et al., 2018a. A deep learning approach on short-term spatiotemporal distribution forecasting of dockless bike-sharing system. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018 (1), 1–13.
  • Alt, H. and Godau, M., 1995. Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves. International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications, 5 (1995), 75–91. doi:10.1142/S0218195995000064
  • Austwick, M.Z., et al., 2013. The structure of spatial networks and communities in bicycle sharing systems. PloS One, 8 (9), e74685. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074685
  • Bachand-Marleau, J., Lee, B.H., and El-Geneidy, A.M., 2012. Better understanding of factors influencing likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use. Transportation Research Record, 2314 (1), 66–71. doi:10.3141/2314-09
  • Bengtsson, L., et al., 2011. Improved response to disasters and outbreaks by tracking population movements with mobile phone network data: a post-earthquake geospatial study in Haiti. PLoS Medicine, 8 (8), e1001083. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001083
  • Boeing, G., 2017. OSMnx: new methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65 (2017), 126–139. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
  • Broach, J., Dill, J., and Gliebe, J., 2012. Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46 (10), 1730–1740.
  • Brockmann, D., Hufnagel, L., and Geisel, T., 2006. The scaling laws of human travel. Nature, 439 (7075), 462. doi:10.1038/nature04292
  • Calabrese, F., et al., 2013. Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 26 (2013), 301–313. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.009
  • Chang, X., et al., 2018. Statistical patterns of human mobility in emerging Bicycle Sharing Systems. PLOS One, 13 (3), e0193795. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193795
  • Cho, Y.S., Ver Steeg, G., and Galstyan, A., 2014. Where and why users” check in”. In: Twenty-Eighth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, June. Québec City, Québec: AAAI, 269–275.
  • Conrow, L., Murray, A.T., and Fischer, H.A., 2018. An optimization approach for equitable bicycle share station siting. Journal of Transport Geography, 69 (2018), 163–170. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.023
  • Corcoran, J., et al., 2014. Spatio-temporal patterns of a public bicycle sharing program: the effect of weather and calendar events. Journal of Transport Geography, 41 (2014), 292–305. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.09.003
  • DeMaio, P., 2009. Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation, 12 (4), 3. doi:10.5038/2375-0901
  • Dill, J., 2009. Bicycling for transportation and health: the role of infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30 (1), S95–S110. doi:10.1057/jphp.2008.56
  • Etienne, C. and Latifa, O., 2014. Model-based count series clustering for bike sharing system usage mining: a case study with the Vélib’system of Paris. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 5 (3), 39.
  • Faghih-Imani, A., et al., 2017. Hail a cab or ride a bike? A travel time comparison of taxi and bicycle-sharing systems in New York City. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101 (2017), 11–21.
  • Faghih-Imani, A., et al., 2014. How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 306–314. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.013
  • Ferreira, N., et al., 2013. Visual exploration of big spatio-temporal urban data: A study of new york city taxi trips. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19 (12), 2149–2158. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.226
  • Fishman, E., 2016. Bikeshare: A review of recent literature. Transport Reviews, 36 (1), 92–113. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036
  • Frade, I. and Ribeiro, A., 2015. Bike-sharing stations: A maximal covering location approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 82 (2015), 216–227.
  • Froehlich, J., Neumann, J., and Oliver, N., 2008. Measuring the pulse of the city through shared bicycle programs. In: Proceedings of UrbanSense08, Raleigh, NC, USA, 16–20. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.023.
  • Gonzalez, M.C., Hidalgo, C.A., and Barabasi, A.L., 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature, 453 (7196), 779. doi:10.1038/nature06958
  • Graser, A., et al., 2019. Untangling origin-destination flows in geographic information systems. Information Visualization, 18 (1), 153–172. doi:10.1177/1473871617738122
  • Guo, D., et al., 2012. Discovering spatial patterns in origin‐destination mobility data. Transactions in GIS, 16 (3), 411–429. doi:10.1111/tgis.2012.16.issue-3
  • Guo, Y., et al., 2017. Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo, China. PloS One, 12 (9), e0185100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185100
  • Gutman, D., 2016. ”Will helmet law kill Seattle’s new bike-share program?”. The Seattle Times, 19 Dec. [Accessed 17 January 2018].
  • Haider, Z., et al., 2018. Inventory rebalancing through pricing in public bike sharing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 270 (1), 103–117. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.053
  • Hood, J., Sall, E., and Charlton, B., 2011. A GPS-based bicycle route choice model for San Francisco, California. Transportation Letters, 3 (1), 63–75. doi:10.3328/TL.2011.03.01.63-75
  • Huttenlocher, D.P., Klanderman, G.A., and Rucklidge, W.J., 1993. Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15 (9), 850–863. doi:10.1109/34.232073
  • Hyodo, T., Suzuki, N., and Takahashi, K., 2000. Modeling of bicycle route and destination choice behavior for bicycle road network plan. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1705 (1), 70–76. doi:10.3141/1705-11
  • Kou, Z. and Cai, H., 2019. Understanding bike sharing travel patterns: an analysis of trip data from eight cities. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 515, 785–797. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.123
  • Krenn, P.J., Oja, P., and Titze, S., 2014. Route choices of transport bicyclists: a comparison of actually used and shortest routes. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11 (1), 31. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-31
  • Kulanthayan, S., et al., 2001. Modeling of compliance behavior of motorcyclists to proper usage of safety helmets in Malaysia. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2 (3), 239–246.
  • Li, X., et al., 2018. Free-Floating Bike Sharing in Jiangsu: users’ Behaviors and Influencing Factors. Energies, 11 (7), 1664. doi:10.3390/en11071664
  • Li, Y. and Shuai, B., 2018. Origin and destination forecasting on dockless shared bicycle in a hybrid deep-learning algorithms. Multimedia Tools and Applications, (2018 (1), 1–12.
  • Liu, X., et al., 2015. Revealing travel patterns and city structure with taxi trip data. Journal of Transport Geography, 43 (2015), 78–90. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.01.016
  • Liu, X., et al., 2016. Incorporating spatial interaction patterns in classifying and understanding urban land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (2), 334–350. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1086923
  • Liu, Y., et al., 2012. Understanding intra-urban trip patterns from taxi trajectory data. Journal of Geographical Systems, 14 (4), 463–483. doi:10.1007/s10109-012-0166-z
  • Liu, Z., Shen, Y., and Zhu, Y., 2018. Inferring dockless shared bike distribution in new cities. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on web search and data mining, February Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM, 378–386
  • Lou, Y., et al., 2009. Map-matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, November Seattle, USA. doi:10.1145/1653771.1653820
  • Lu, C.C., 2016. Robust multi-period fleet allocation models for bike-sharing systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16 (1), 61–82. doi:10.1007/s11067-013-9203-9
  • Lv, X. and Pan, H.X., 2018. Sharing bicycle riding characteristics analysis in Shanghai based on mobike opening data. New Transportation Service, 2 (2018), 46–51.
  • Martens, K., 2004. The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9 (4), 281–294. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.005
  • McGlade, C. and Ekins, P., 2015. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 C. Nature, 517 (7533), 187. doi:10.1038/nature14016
  • McKenzie, G., 2018. Docked vs. dockless bike-sharing: contrasting spatiotemporal patterns (Short paper). In: LIPIcs-Leibniz international proceedings in informatics (Vol. 114). Melbourne, Australia: Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 46:1–46:7. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.46
  • Minikel, E., 2012. Cyclist safety on bicycle boulevards and parallel arterial routes in Berkeley, California. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45 (2012), 241–247. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.009
  • Nair, R., et al., 2013. Large-scale vehicle sharing systems: analysis of Vélib’. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7 (1), 85–106. doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.660115
  • Newson, P. and Krumm, J. (2009, November). Hidden Markov map matching through noise and sparseness. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, Seattle, USA: ACM, 336–343. doi:10.1177/1753193408101464.
  • O’brien, O., Cheshire, J., and Batty, M., 2014. Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 34 (2014), 262–273. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.007
  • Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., and Frank, L.D., 2003. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25 (2), 80–91. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
  • Shafizadeh, K. and Niemeier, D., 1997. Bicycle journey-to-work: travel behavior characteristics and spatial attributes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1578 (1), 84–90. doi:10.3141/1578-11
  • Shaheen, S., Martin, E., and Cohen, A., 2013. Public bikesharing and modal shift behavior: a comparative study of early bikesharing systems in North America. International Journal of Transportation, 1 (1), 35–54. doi:10.14257/ijt
  • Shanghai, 2019. Weather history and data archive. Available from: http://www.tianqihoubao.com/lishi/shanghai/month/201608.html [Accessed 19 August 2019].
  • Shen, Y., Zhang, X., and Zhao, J., 2018. Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12 (9), 686–700. doi:10.1080/15568318.2018.1429696
  • Siła-Nowicka, K., et al., 2016. Analysis of human mobility patterns from GPS trajectories and contextual information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (5), 881–906. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1100731
  • Singhvi, D., et al., 2015. Predicting bike usage for New York City’s bike sharing system. In: B. Dilkina, R. A. Hutchinson and D. Sheldon, eds. AAAI Workshop: computational Sustainability. Austin, TX: USA, 110–114.
  • Stinson, M. and Bhat, C., 2003. Commuter bicyclist route choice: analysis using a stated preference survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828 (1), 107–115. doi:10.3141/1828-13
  • Sun, Y., 2018. Sharing and riding: how the dockless bike sharing scheme in China shapes the city. Urban Science, 2 (3), 68. doi:10.3390/urbansci2030068
  • Tizzoni, M., et al., 2014. On the use of human mobility proxies for modeling epidemics. PLoS Computational Biology, 10 (7), e1003716. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003716
  • Vogel, P., Greiser, T., and Mattfeld, D.C., 2011. Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: exploring activity patterns. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20 (2011), 514–523. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.058
  • Wang, P., et al., 2012. Understanding road usage patterns in urban areas. Scientific Reports, 2 (2012), 1001. doi:10.1038/srep01001
  • Wang, S., et al., 2013. Shortest path algorithm accelerated technology and search space analysis. Geospatial Information, 6 (2013), 62–65.
  • Wardrop, J.G., 1952. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1 (3), 325–363. doi:10.1680/ipeds.1952.11259
  • Wikipedia, 2019. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobike [Accessed 30 October 2019].
  • Winters, M., et al., 2010. Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: bicycling versus driving. Journal of Urban Health, 87 (6), 969–993. doi:10.1007/s11524-010-9509-6
  • Wu, F. and Xue, Y., 2017. Innovations of bike sharing industry in China: A case study of Mobike’s station-less bike sharing system. Available from: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1111732/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Accessed 23 September 2018].
  • Yang, Y., et al., 2019. A spatiotemporal and graph-based analysis of dockless bike sharing patterns to understand urban flows over the last mile. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 77, 101361. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101361
  • Yuan, N.J., et al., 2015. Discovering urban functional zones using latent activity trajectories. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 27 (3), 712–725. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2014.2345405
  • Yue, Y., et al., 2014. Zooming into individuals to understand the collective: A review of trajectory-based travel behaviour studies. Travel Behaviour and Society, 1 (2), 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2013.12.002
  • Zhang, D., et al., 2011. iBAT: detecting anomalous taxi trajectories from GPS traces. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, September. Beijing, China: ACM, 99–108.
  • Zhang, S., et al., 2017. Revealing intra-urban travel patterns and service ranges from taxi trajectories. Journal of Transport Geography, 61 (2017), 72–86. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.04.009
  • Zhang, X., et al., 2018a. Identifying urban functional zones using public bicycle rental records and Point-of-Interest data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7 (12), 459. doi:10.3390/ijgi7120459
  • Zhang, Y., et al., 2018b. Mining bike-sharing travel behavior data: an investigation into trip chains and transition activities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 69 (2018), 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.12.004
  • Zhang, Y. and Mi, Z., 2018. Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Applied Energy, 220 (2018), 296–301. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101
  • Zheng, L., et al., 2018. Spatial–temporal travel pattern mining using massive taxi trajectory data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 501 (2018), 24–41. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.064
  • Zhu, S., Levinson, D., and Ropert-Coudert, Y., 2015. Do people use the shortest path? An empirical test of Wardrop’s first principle. PloS One, 10 (8), e0134322. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134322

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.